Everyone,
I cleaned up our FRS a bit.
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: leaf, sourceforge/sitedocs
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Sp
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 10:56, Mike Noyes wrote:
> I think we can remove node3 from our pseudo-directory structure in the
> SF FRS. The SF staff changed the default MIME type to
> application/octet-stream for all files. This means we no longer have to
> be concerned with the extension name of node4.
On Monday 06 January 2003 12:56 pm, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> I think we can remove node3 from our pseudo-directory structure in the
> SF FRS. The SF staff changed the default MIME type to
> application/octet-stream for all files. This means we no longer have to
> be concerned with the extens
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2003 21:20 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:54, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
> > Am Montag, 6. Januar 2003 20:43 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > > The end of my message was just an example of our current system to
> > > clarify my proposed change. I guess it didn't successful
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:58, Vladimir I. wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote about "Re: [leaf-devel] FRS pseudo-directory structure":
> > The end of my message was just an example of our current system to
> > clarify my proposed change. I guess it didn't successfully achieve my
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:54, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Januar 2003 20:43 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > The end of my message was just an example of our current system to
> > clarify my proposed change. I guess it didn't successfully achieve my
> > desired goal. I apologize for confusing th
Mike Noyes wrote about "Re: [leaf-devel] FRS pseudo-directory structure":
> K.-P.,
> The end of my message was just an example of our current system to
> clarify my proposed change. I guess it didn't successfully achieve my
> desired goal. I apologize for confusing th
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2003 20:43 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:29, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
> > I did not understand the end of your mail, but I always disliked node3.
>
> K.-P.,
> The end of my message was just an example of our current system to
> clarify my proposed change. I gue
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:29, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
> I did not understand the end of your mail, but I always disliked node3.
K.-P.,
The end of my message was just an example of our current system to
clarify my proposed change. I guess it didn't successfully achieve my
desired goal. I apologize
I did not understand the end of your mail, but I always disliked node3.
kp
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2003 19:56 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> Everyone,
> I think we can remove node3 from our pseudo-directory structure in the
> SF FRS. The SF staff changed the default MIME type to
> application/octet-stream fo
Everyone,
I think we can remove node3 from our pseudo-directory structure in the
SF FRS. The SF staff changed the default MIME type to
application/octet-stream for all files. This means we no longer have to
be concerned with the extension name of node4. Opinions?
How do I submit my contribution fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
