> On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > >I'd even like to see maintence of my disk images picked up...I'm
obviously
> > >dropping the ball, as I have yet to even update the images with the
latest
> > >dhclient package...just too busy.
> >
> > Is anyone interested in maintaining the EigerStein
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >I'd even like to see maintence of my disk images picked up...I'm obviously
> >dropping the ball, as I have yet to even update the images with the latest
> >dhclient package...just too busy.
>
> Is anyone interested in maintaining the EigerStein images?
Yes
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Noyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Home Page Development
> At 07:20 AM 2/14/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler"
> <
At 07:20 AM 2/14/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Everyone,
> > Provided Charles and David agree, I'd like us to create new
> > EigerStein and Oxygen pages. I think this will allow us to
> > eliminate/reduce web maintenance tasks that Charles and David need
> > to
> Everyone,
> Provided Charles and David agree, I'd like us to create new EigerStein and
> Oxygen pages. I think this will allow us to eliminate/reduce web
> maintenance tasks that Charles and David need to perform. They'll still
> have final say on content for their releases.
I support anything
On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> You must have missed the day or so it was bandwidth limited to 48 KBits...it
> was god-awful slow.
It's possible. Or latenight on a Saturday night just doesn't put demand on
the servers.
> Entirely too true...you don't even want to hear abou
> > Check out:
> >
> > http://www.newtek.com
> >
> > to test your patience. Put yourself in the 'saint' catagory if you let
the
> > entire page load, and that's just the splash screen.
>
> To note, it loads pretty darned fast at about 04:15 EST. =)
>
> On the other hand, when I clicked the link t
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Check out:
>
> http://www.newtek.com
>
> to test your patience. Put yourself in the 'saint' catagory if you let the
> entire page load, and that's just the splash screen.
To note, it loads pretty darned fast at about 04:15 EST. =)
On the oth
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 12:01:47PM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> Everyone,
> It looks like something needs to be done. Take a look at the awful looking
> results here:
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net
>
> I can scale the image to the proper width so it doesn't get squashed (note:
> the image will
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> At 03:50 PM 1/13/01 -0600, Paul Batozech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Mike N.
> >
> >Well, I hacked together a page for me and it seems to work ok. I stole
> >Eric's basic design (he blessed this) with Netscape and hacked it up to
> >suit my purposes with Netscape's html ed
At 03:50 PM 1/13/01 -0600, Paul Batozech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike N.
>
>Well, I hacked together a page for me and it seems to work ok. I stole
>Eric's basic design (he blessed this) with Netscape and hacked it up to
>suit my purposes with Netscape's html editor. Actually went pretty smoo
At 12:22 PM 1/13/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Charles,
> > I'd prefer quick. We can fix things later. Also, we may want to
> > change the SF structure later anyway. A lot depends on what
> > actually works. Theory is great, but until we start integrating
> > thi
> At 11:14 AM 1/13/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm back home, and looking to rsync my site to SF, but I have a problem
> >with the "downloadable files". While I agree these should go in the FTP
> >area, my current site is not really setup to support this. I c
At 11:14 AM 1/13/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm back home, and looking to rsync my site to SF, but I have a problem
>with the "downloadable files". While I agree these should go in the FTP
>area, my current site is not really setup to support this. I could ra
> Everyone,
> You can now move your LRP/LEAF content to the SourceForge site. Follow the
> instructions below to setup web and ftp access to your personal content.
> Replace all occurrences of "yourname" with your SourceForge unix user
name.
> Please place all downloadable files in the anonymous f
At 02:41 PM 1/11/01 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:54:16AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> > At 10:50 AM 1/11/01 -0600, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Mike, when are you going to change the title? ;-)
> >
> > Old subject: Vote on web & logo entries
>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:54:16AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> At 10:50 AM 1/11/01 -0600, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Mike, when are you going to change the title? ;-)
>
> Old subject: Vote on web & logo entries
> Current subject: Home Page Development
I think he meant the
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 02:55:55PM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> I just replaced cool-metal_leaf.png with a modified version. Please take a
> look at it and let me know if it's any better than the original. Thanks.
Sweet! It looks great! [01/11/2001 1:37pmEST]
> --
> Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECT
At 10:50 AM 1/11/01 -0600, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike, when are you going to change the title? ;-)
Old subject: Vote on web & logo entries
Current subject: Home Page Development
David,
I thought this subject was descriptive for CVS setup, update of links, logo
integration
Mike, when are you going to change the title? ;-)
Or are we still voting? ;-)
--
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/lis
At 08:15 AM 1/11/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
incorrectly wrote:
>--- Symlinks -
>You may want to create symlinks in your home directory similar to these.
>
>$ cd ~
>$ ln -s leaf /home/groups/leaf
>$ ln -s leafpub /home/groups/ftp/pub/leaf
Ugh, correction:
$ cd ~
Everyone,
You can now move your LRP/LEAF content to the SourceForge site. Follow the
instructions below to setup web and ftp access to your personal content.
Replace all occurrences of "yourname" with your SourceForge unix user name.
Please place all downloadable files in the anonymous ftp area
At 12:58 AM 1/11/01 +0100, you wrote:
> > At 12:01 PM 1/10/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I just replaced cool-metal_leaf.png with a modified version. Please
> > take a look at it and let me know if it's any better than the
> > original. Thanks.
> >
>I like it
Eric,
Tha
> At 12:01 PM 1/10/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just replaced cool-metal_leaf.png with a modified version. Please take a
> look at it and let me know if it's any better than the original. Thanks.
>
I like it
btw i changed the links, so they do go anywhere at least.
th
At 12:01 PM 1/10/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Everyone,
>It looks like something needs to be done. Take a look at the awful looking
>results here:
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net
>
>I can scale the image to the proper width so it doesn't get squashed
>(note: the image will proba
At 01:24 PM 1/10/01 -0600, "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 8 Jan 2001, at 17:23, Eric Wolzak wrote:
>
>[Mike wrote?]
>
> > > Eric,
> > > I think by default you're the lead on the home page. What size do
> > > you want me to scale the logo to?
>
> > The actual height of the first ta
On 8 Jan 2001, at 17:23, Eric Wolzak wrote:
[Mike wrote?]
> > Eric,
> > I think by default you're the lead on the home page. What size do
> > you want me to scale the logo to?
> The actual height of the first table row is 71 pixels so if you could
> keep the height below this
I stand by my vot
Everyone,
Good CVS news! This may be the cause of all the support requests. They are
working on shell level CVS access, and current support requests may not
apply after the change. :)
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=55742
-
By:
At 09:27 AM 1/10/01 -0800, "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike:
> If needed, I can setup an alternate CVS server
>for LEAF at echogent.com, a four-machine co-lo'd suite at
>Exodus. I've plenty of extra bandwidth right now, so I
>thought I'd offer. :)
Scott,
I don't think it's
Mike:
If needed, I can setup an alternate CVS server
for LEAF at echogent.com, a four-machine co-lo'd suite at
Exodus. I've plenty of extra bandwidth right now, so I
thought I'd offer. :)
-Scott
> Everyone,
> I tired to create the CVS tree last night, but I was unsuccessful. I
> got a
At 08:28 AM 1/8/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Everyone,
>We can start discussing enhancements to our home page, but I'd like
>to hold off on actual changes until I get it into CVS. Thanks.
Everyone,
I tired to create the CVS tree last night, but I was unsuccessful. I got a
e
At 06:24 PM 1/8/01 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Wolzak) wrote:
> > At 03:28 PM 1/8/01 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >first things first!
> > >my congratulations to all the developers, specially to Eric and
> > >Mike (noyes). a special thanks to Mike, who is having a great d
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 03:28 PM 1/8/01 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >first things first!
> >my congratulations to all the developers, specially to Eric and Mike
> >(noyes). a special thanks to Mike, who is having a great deal of work, and
> >manages t
At 15:20 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>At 09:48 PM 12/5/00 +, Pedro Barreto wrote:
> >At 08:28 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
> >>At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common
> >>>sense and cour
At 09:48 PM 12/5/00 +, Pedro Barreto wrote:
>At 08:28 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>>At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common
>>>sense and courtesy than any strict process. Personally, I'd
At 08:28 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common
>>sense and courtesy than any strict process. Personally, I'd be happy with
>>a process where we all look at the
At 11:22 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Way cool. I'll have to get my logo entry together this weekend. :)
>hmmm...LEAF
>Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall
>think what visuals that brings to mind.
Yeah, Ray came up with a great name for the project. :)
>And yep, I
At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common
>sense and courtesy than any strict process. Personally, I'd be happy with
>a process where we all look at the candidate logos and express our
>opinions
: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 5:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup
>
>
> At 04:00 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >All right,
> >
> >What's
At 04:00 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Steven Peck wrote:
>All right,
>
>What's the rules on the logo entries? I joined the early list but got
>dropped off and want to help out.
Rules? We don't need no stinkin' rules.
Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common
sense and court
At 04:00 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>All right,
>
>What's the rules on the logo entries? I joined the early list but got
>dropped off and want to help out.
Great! There aren't any rules, and all contributions are appreciated.
Links to the current entries are here:
h
All right,
What's the rules on the logo entries? I joined the early list but got
dropped off and want to help out.
Thanks,
SP
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 2:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Leaf-devel] Hom
At 22:36 29-11-2000 +0100, you wrote:
>Hello Pedro, Mike
> > I like the idea about separation data and style, but why XML? why use xml
> > when the final client (browser) will see html, and besides, editing a
> how-to
> > in xml?!?! we'd had to have either a standart for ourselves and an editor,
Hello Pedro, Mike
> I like the idea about separation data and style, but why XML? why use xml
> when the final client (browser) will see html, and besides, editing a how-to
> in xml?!?! we'd had to have either a standart for ourselves and an editor,
> or edit the text trought the xml tags.
>
>
At 08:53 PM 11/29/00 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Wolzak) wrote:
>Hello, i agree with the group that said, the pages should be as
>simple to load as possible. With a lot of advanced features, you
>have completely different views with a IE or Netscape or Opera
>I for example do use lynx only occa
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 7:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page entry
>
>
> Hello, i agree with the group that said, the pages should be as
>
Hello, i agree with the group that said, the pages should be as
simple to load as possible. With a lot of advanced features, you
have completely different views with a IE or Netscape or Opera
I for example do use lynx only occasional but stylesheet, javascript
and so on are always switched off.
On 29 Nov 2000, at 3:05, Pedro Barreto wrote:
> but... come on... do you really use lynx that once in a while??
Used it last week
> I don't know about you but I [haven't used] lynx for more than 2 years,
> there is always a better browser next pc ;)
As I said, I used Lynx just last week.
At 03:32 PM 11/29/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>snip
> > Ok, I thought this is why we were submitting multiple home
> > pages. Different people have different ideas on page design. I
> > thought we were going to leave it up to the leaf community to decide
> > which one was be
At 03:27 PM 11/29/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>css is some sort of extention to html. html tags are somehow limited, so
>what you do is define a css style and aplly it to the html tag, since css
>has plenty properties to modify html tags that arent present on the html
>ta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was going to help you with your site, but rick started doing one! now I
> can't help both! :)
I'm about satisfied with mine as a style demonstration. I might
try a couple other ideas I had, but I won't need much help (unless
you want to do that background... :-)
> >
> At 06:47 AM 11/29/00 -0800, Mike Noyes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >At 02:16 PM 11/29/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>for reference check my site, http://pxb.ods.org, it's in
> Portuguese, but
> >>comment the style(aside for frames!), if it is down, it's
> the stupi
snip
> Ok, I thought this is why we were submitting multiple home
> pages. Different
> people have different ideas on page design. I thought we were
> going to
> leave it up to the leaf community to decide which one was best.
I was going to help you with your site, but rick started doing one!
At 06:47 AM 11/29/00 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 02:16 PM 11/29/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>for reference check my site, http://pxb.ods.org, it's in Portuguese, but
>>comment the style(aside for frames!), if it is down, it's the stupid IIS
>>that can
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > no, please! don't say that! my only consern was not 'visual
> design', but
> > funcional design, I'll try to explain: sometimes, when you
> design a page,
> > tables don't align with each other, paragraphs are not
> indented, etc.. and
> > thats when css has to be
At 02:16 PM 11/29/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>for reference check my site, http://pxb.ods.org, it's in Portuguese, but
>comment the style(aside for frames!), if it is down, it's the stupid IIS
>that can't serve for more than 1 day! I burned my redhat server's power
>supp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> no, please! don't say that! my only consern was not 'visual design', but
> funcional design, I'll try to explain: sometimes, when you design a page,
> tables don't align with each other, paragraphs are not indented, etc.. and
> thats when css has to be used. thats the ki
At 08:39 AM 11/29/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pedro Barreto wrote:
> > great! the simpler the better, that's what I was talking about.
> >
> > but... come on... do you really use lynx that once in a while?? I
> > don't know about you but I don't use lynx for more than 2 year
> From: Rick Onanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Pedro Barreto wrote:
> > great! the simpler the better, that's what I was talking about.
> >
> > but... come on... do you really use lynx that once in a
> while?? I don't
> > know about you but I don't use lynx for more than 2 years,
> there is
Pedro Barreto wrote:
> great! the simpler the better, that's what I was talking about.
>
> but... come on... do you really use lynx that once in a while?? I don't
> know about you but I don't use lynx for more than 2 years, there is always
> a better browser next pc ;)
I had used lynx about 35 m
At 10:35 28-11-2000 -0600, you wrote:
>On 24 Nov 2000, at 21:56, Pedro Barreto wrote:
>
> > no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> > single css file, etc..
>
>Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
>programs like Lynx (especially the blind).
At 11:34 AM 11/28/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> > > single css file, etc..
> >
> > Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
> > programs
David Douthitt wrote:
> > no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> > single css file, etc..
>
> Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
> programs like Lynx (especially the blind). Lynx is also present in
> almost every Linux installation - and
On 24 Nov 2000, at 21:56, Pedro Barreto wrote:
> no really, I was talking about tables, div's, span's, css, a
> single css file, etc..
Can we keep the web page Lynx-friendly? There are many who depend on
programs like Lynx (especially the blind). Lynx is also present in
almost every Linux i
At 06:12 PM 11/27/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Rick Onanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > I was talking about white space in the html code. Not the
> > page itself. I
> > > still like my entry, but the code needs to be cleaned up (e.g. add
> > > comm
Rick Onanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > I was talking about white space in the html code. Not the
> page itself. I
> > still like my entry, but the code needs to be cleaned up (e.g. add
> > comments, fix indents etc.).
>
> Doh!
>
> Hell, I can't say as I've ever seen whi
Mike Noyes wrote:
> I was talking about white space in the html code. Not the page itself. I
> still like my entry, but the code needs to be cleaned up (e.g. add
> comments, fix indents etc.).
Doh!
Hell, I can't say as I've ever seen whitespace so excessive that it
bothered me, in HTML code...
At 09:12 AM 11/27/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > White space is good. I'll use your suggestions to clean my entry up.
>
>White space is good, like everything else, in moderation and
>used correctly. In the example Pedro showed us, I believe that
>whitespac
Mike Noyes wrote:
> White space is good. I'll use your suggestions to clean my entry up. I
White space is good, like everything else, in moderation and
used correctly. In the example Pedro showed us, I believe that
whitespace was used incorrectly, probably because the were too
lazy to make it wor
Pedro Barreto wrote:
> do you like this site style?
> http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/p/doc.asp?id=29&iface=2
Only thing I don't like is how the text is pushed over to the side.
I know it's a result of having the links down the left; but I can
only imagine that this page must be difficult to read in
At 09:56 PM 11/24/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 12:08 24-11-2000 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>>At 01:11 AM 11/24/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>do you like this site style?
>>>http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/p/doc.asp?id=29&iface=2
>>>
>>>that's the kind o
At 12:08 24-11-2000 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>At 01:11 AM 11/24/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>do you like this site style?
>>http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/p/doc.asp?id=29&iface=2
>>
>>that's the kind of style I like in information related sites, simples,
>>easy to read and q
At 01:11 AM 11/24/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>do you like this site style?
>http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/p/doc.asp?id=29&iface=2
>
>that's the kind of style I like in information related sites, simples,
>easy to read and quick.
>
>also very easy to build and maintain :)
>I
do you like this site style?
http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/p/doc.asp?id=29&iface=2
that's the kind of style I like in information related sites, simples, easy
to read and quick.
also very easy to build and maintain :)
I belive that we should adopt some kind of basic style, what ever it looks
li
At 10:13 AM 11/22/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > >but I have no idea what to put for content - the content
> > >you've got at your example site looks about perfect, and
> > >is formatted about perfectly too...so how do I compete?
> > >Change the background
Mike Noyes wrote:
> >but I have no idea what to put for content - the content
> >you've got at your example site looks about perfect, and
> >is formatted about perfectly too...so how do I compete?
> >Change the background color and logo that's used? ;)
>
> I thought we were looking at design conc
At 09:41 AM 11/22/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > At 08:45 AM 11/21/00 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > We now have a very simple home page available. Should I separate
> > the logo submissions by author?
>
>You already did. Looks good.
Mike Noyes wrote:
> At 08:45 AM 11/21/00 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We now have a very simple home page available. Should I separate the logo
> submissions by author?
You already did. Looks good.
I'm going to attempt to create at
http://www.c0wz.com/leaf/
but I have no idea
At 08:45 AM 11/21/00 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If there are no objections, I'll publish an "under construction" page with
>links to the logo and web page entries today.
We now have a very simple home page available. Should I separate the logo
submissions by author?
http://
> At 11:14 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Rick Onanian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > submission ready for viewing? I really want to put
> something on our
> > > site, other than:
> > >
> > > We're Sorry but this Project hasn't yet uploaded their personal
> > > webpage yet. Please c
> At 11:14 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Rick Onanian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > submission ready for viewing? I really want to put
> something on our
> > > site, other than:
> > >
> > > We're Sorry but this Project hasn't yet uploaded their personal
> > > webpage yet. Please c
At 11:14 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > submission ready for viewing? I really want to put something on our
> > site, other than:
> >
> > We're Sorry but this Project hasn't yet uploaded their personal
> > webpage yet. Please check back soon for u
At 04:24 PM 11/21/00 +, you wrote:
> > From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:03 PM
> >
> > At 10:32 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Rick Onanian
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > > BTW, do you think it's time to call for a vote on the s
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Ok, that brings up the next question. Does anyone else have a home page
Mike, I think you're the only one doing anything on it, here. :-/
I can't even imagine a concept that I like better than what you've
done, which is why I've not bothered. I'm sure everybody else has
their
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:03 PM
>
> At 10:32 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Rick Onanian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > BTW, do you think it's time to call for a vote on the submitted
> > > logos, or should we wait until after
At 10:32 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > BTW, do you think it's time to call for a vote on the submitted
> > logos, or should we wait until after the holiday?
>
>I think it should be part of the vote for the winning page; when
>we decide that, we c
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Onanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Home Page entry
>
>
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > BTW, do you think it's time to call for a
Mike Noyes wrote:
> BTW, do you think it's time to call for a vote on the submitted logos, or
> should we wait until after the holiday?
I think it should be part of the vote for the winning page; when
we decide that, we can either decide to keep whatever logo is in
use on the sample page, or vote
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:24 PM
>
>
> At 03:11 PM 11/21/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[snip]
> > > BTW, do you think it's time to call for a vote on the
> > > submitted logos, or
> > >
At 03:11 PM 11/21/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[snip]
> > BTW, do you think it's time to call for a vote on the
> > submitted logos, or
> > should we wait until after the holiday?
>
>I haven't got the time to work on my other logos.
Pedro,
That's alright, I haven't had time
[snip]
> BTW, do you think it's time to call for a vote on the
> submitted logos, or
> should we wait until after the holiday?
I haven't got the time to work on my other logos.
what holiday are you speaking about?
pedro
>
> --
> Mike Noyes
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://sourceforge.net/projec
At 08:44 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Boy, was I out of it yesterday...I hadn't the attention span to
>deal with a single message all day.
I hope you're feeling better today.
>Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Everyone,
> > I just updated my home page entr
Boy, was I out of it yesterday...I hadn't the attention span to
deal with a single message all day.
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> I just updated my home page entry to include individual developer pages.
> Is this idea any good?
I think so; but it would take a while to get used to before anyb
93 matches
Mail list logo
