On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 09:03, David Douthitt wrote:
> On Friday 19 April 2002 08:13 am, you wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 00:19, David Douthitt wrote:
>
> > > I'm not keen on that either. Maybe I'm influenced by my RPM bias
> > > - but a file of:
> > >
> > > Tag:
> > > Tag:
> > > Tag:
> > >
On Friday 19 April 2002 08:13 am, you wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 00:19, David Douthitt wrote:
> > I'm not keen on that either. Maybe I'm influenced by my RPM bias
> > - but a file of:
> >
> > Tag:
> > Tag:
> > Tag:
> >
> > Seems good enough to me.
> OK. The "Tag: " will be harder for me
On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 00:19, David Douthitt wrote:
> > Only the LEAF system and shell requirements are problems for XML
> > metadata.
> >
> > What was your opinion of CSV (comma separated values)?
>
> I'm not keen on that either. Maybe I'm influenced by my RPM bias -
> but a file of:
>
> Tag:
On 4/18/02 at 8:04 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 22:48, David Douthitt wrote:
> This sounds like XML metadata to me.
>
> > ...and with the following requirements:
> >
> > * Expandability (add tags at will)
>
> XML can handle this.
And can it handle a tag t
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 22:48, David Douthitt wrote:
> On 4/17/02 at 7:54 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 19:50, David Douthitt wrote:
>
> > Will the .desc/.xml file's primary purpose be indexing our
> > packages, or will it be used by the LEAF release/branc
On 4/17/02 at 7:54 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 19:50, David Douthitt wrote:
> Will the .desc/.xml file's primary purpose be indexing our
> packages, or will it be used by the LEAF release/branch
> internally? If its intended use is for indexing, I believe
>
On 4/16/02 at 7:26 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 03:46, David Douthitt wrote:
> David,
> I think we should use the program's name, or place it in what RedHat
> calls "Summary". Personally I prefer the deb format, but it doesn't
> include summary/program name i
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 09:46, guitarlynn wrote:
> > Who determines what keywords and categories apply to each package? I
> > believe these tags will cause confusion if there is no set
> > categorization template.
>
> Maybe there should be one file templated out with certain information,
> like sou
> Who determines what keywords and categories apply to each package? I
> believe these tags will cause confusion if there is no set
> categorization template.
Maybe there should be one file templated out with certain information,
like source version, package revision, packagename, glibc-required,
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 03:46, David Douthitt wrote:
> On 4/14/02 at 11:20 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > David outlines a package description file in his
> > "Developing for LRP" guide. The format follows.
> > I propose the following changes:
>
> Comments follow...
>
> > use
On 4/14/02 at 11:20 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David outlines a package description file in his
> "Developing for LRP" guide. The format follows.
>
> /var/lib/lrpkg/pkg.desc
> Name: upx
> Version: 1.20
> Release: 1
> Packager: David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Packaged: Wed J
Everyone,
I sent the prior message prematurely.
On Sun, 2002-04-14 at 11:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
> I propose the following changes: use program name instead of package
> name, use ISO 8601 date format, use version format from pkg.version, add
> glibc version, remove "Keywords", "Release", and "Grou
12 matches
Mail list logo
