Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Mike Noyes, 2001-05-19 07:14 -0700
> >We agree the package tree needs categories. Now the hard part, what should
> >they be? I think we need a "scripts" category. I have my doubts about
> >using a "net" category, because most of our packages fit into it.
>
> Everyone,
> Wha
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Mike Noyes, 2001-05-19 07:14 -0700
> >We agree the package tree needs categories. Now the hard part, what should
> >they be? I think we need a "scripts" category. I have my doubts about
> >using a "net" category, because most of our packages fit into it.
>
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> George,
> We now have two methods for the cvs package directory.
>A) tarball plus diff with a makefile
>B) import original source and modify using cvs to create diffs
>
> Should we allow developers to use the method they prefer for packages they
>
Mike Noyes, 2001-05-19 07:14 -0700
>We agree the package tree needs categories. Now the hard part, what should
>they be? I think we need a "scripts" category. I have my doubts about
>using a "net" category, because most of our packages fit into it.
Everyone,
What about the following four catego
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-18 19:40 +0200
>David Douthitt wrote:
>
>>George Metz wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
>>>
We have over 100 packages that I'm aware of. I'm sure that number
will increase once we start importing packages into cvs. I think the
packages tree mig
George Metz, 2001-05-17 18:27 -0400
>On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > Ewald,
> > Would this make it more difficult for us to track our changes to the
> > original tarballs?
>
>That's fairly trivial to solve though; just do a cleanroom tree that
>contains the original, as-released, unmo
David Douthitt wrote:
>George Metz wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
>>
>>>We have over 100 packages that I'm aware of. I'm sure that number will
>>>increase once we start importing packages into cvs. I think the packages
>>>tree might get cluttered without categories.
>>>
>>Agree
George Metz wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > We have over 100 packages that I'm aware of. I'm sure that number will
> > increase once we start importing packages into cvs. I think the packages
> > tree might get cluttered without categories.
>
> Agreed. Go take a stroll thr
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Ewald,
> Would this make it more difficult for us to track our changes to the
> original tarballs?
That's fairly trivial to solve though; just do a cleanroom tree that
contains the original, as-released, unmodified source. Then you can diff
the cleanroom
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-17 22:33 +0200
>Everybody,
>
>I forget to mention that with *BSD you can check out the source code from
>CVS and "simply" do something like:
>
>root@mybsd:/usr/src # make world
>
>And rebuild the entire system from scratch. I think that is so _very_
>cool. That is one mor
Everybody,
I forget to mention that with *BSD you can check out the source code
from CVS and "simply" do something like:
root@mybsd:/usr/src # make world
And rebuild the entire system from scratch. I think that is so _very_
cool. That is one more reason why I prefer to have the full source co
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-16 19:13 +0200
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>
>>Everyone,
>>I'm going to create the following directories in CVS on Thursday, unless
>>there are objections.
>
>It's a little late perhaps, but I wonder about the usefulness of using cvs
>for storing tarballs and diff files. That woul
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> I'm going to create the following directories in CVS on Thursday,
> unless there are objections.
>
> /release +
> + /eigerstein
> + /ladybug
> + /oxygen
> + /quercus
>
> /script +
> + /weblet
> + (etc.)
>
> /pack
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-06 09:50 +0200
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>I created the following trees in our CVS repository today. There are
>README files in each tree describing the proposed content.
>>doc
>>package
>>release
>>http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/
>>I didn't do anything else,
George Metz, 2001-05-06 10:34 -0400
>On Sun, 6 May 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
> > Reaching such a consensus is imho on of the most important (if not the
> > most) things right now. So whatever agreements we make, we should make
> > them.
>
>Agreed.
>
> > And preferably the discussion shouldn't
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> Reaching such a consensus is imho on of the most important (if not the
> most) things right now. So whatever agreements we make, we should make
> them.
Agreed.
> And preferably the discussion shouldn't be a 3 man discussion as
> it has been until now.
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> I created the following trees in our CVS repository today. There are
> README files in each tree describing the proposed content.
>
> doc
> package
> release
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/
>
> I didn't do anything else, because the discus
Everyone,
I created the following trees in our CVS repository today. There are README
files in each tree describing the proposed content.
doc
package
release
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/
I didn't do anything else, because the discussion on package tree hasn't
reached a
On 3 May 2001, at 10:44, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I wound up using whatever diffs [for ash that]
> > Erik [Andersen] had.
> Fair enough. If you could send me the diff that converts the makefile to
> gnu-make style I'd be thankful.
Everything should be in the Oxygen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2 May 2001, at 15:18, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>> I have to agree with that to a great extent. But many programs use a
>> "configure" script to configure the source tree to be built with certain
>> options. I really prefer to have a script in the diff that calls th
On 2 May 2001, at 15:18, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> I have to agree with that to a great extent. But many programs use a
> "configure" script to configure the source tree to be built with certain
> options. I really prefer to have a script in the diff that calls this
> configure script to doing t
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > What I had in mind was to do the same thing, but with patched sources
> > - and thus then create a package at the same time.
> >
> I would like to keep the lrp-specific things as seperate as possible
> from the or
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-02 14:17 +0200
>Wow, now I need a break. And some coffee too :-)
>
>I hope it's a little clearer now what I want and why. If not I'll have to
>do better. I'd _really_ like to know what people think about this, not
>just you.
Ewald,
Thanks for the explanation. :)
I'll sit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2 May 2001, at 13:23, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly how David does this it's not necessarily
>> obvious to someone other than David how a program is configured, and how
>> it is built, what files to use in the .lrp package, and what lrp
>>
On 2 May 2001, at 13:23, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> If I understand correctly how David does this it's not necessarily
> obvious to someone other than David how a program is configured, and how
> it is built, what files to use in the .lrp package, and what lrp
> specific configs need to be added
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1 May 2001, at 15:19, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a default way of building packages,
>> like Debian? With Debian you can cd into the upacked/patched source
>> directory and do a dpkg-buildpackage -b and voila! a binary package
>
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 20:24 +0200
>
>> Mike Noyes wrote:
>> David proposed something like this already. Take a look at this patch.
>>
>>> Source code + diffs for CVS
>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=412704&group_id=13751
>>> \
>>> &atid=313751
>>
>
On 1 May 2001, at 15:19, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a default way of building packages,
> like Debian? With Debian you can cd into the upacked/patched source
> directory and do a dpkg-buildpackage -b and voila! a binary package
> appears after a while. So we cou
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 20:24 +0200
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>David proposed something like this already. Take a look at this patch.
>>Source code + diffs for CVS
>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=412704&group_id=13751 \
>>&atid=313751
>
>I like the basic idea a lot. What I don't lik
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 16:11 +0200
>
>> Mike Noyes wrote:
>>
>>> The package tree will mimic the Debian source tree. Diff files
>>> should not be gziped. Other than that minor change, do what Debian
>>> does.
>>> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/sourc
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 16:11 +0200
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>
>>The package tree will mimic the Debian source tree. Diff files should
>>not be gziped. Other than that minor change, do what Debian does.
>>http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/source/
>Wouldn't it be a good idea to have
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> The package tree will mimic the Debian source tree. Diff files should
> not be gziped. Other than that minor change, do what Debian does.
> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/source/
>
Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a default way of building packages,
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> I'm going to create the following directories in CVS on Thursday,
> unless there are objections.
>
> /release +
> + /eigerstein
> + /ladybug
> + /oxygen
> + /quercus
Sorry I didn't mention it earlier, but I wonder if the name Que
KP Kirchdörfer, 2001-04-30 19:38 +0200
>Am Montag, 30. April 2001 17:19 schrieben Sie:
> > Everyone,
> > I'm going to create the following directories in CVS on Thursday,
> > unless there are objections.
> >
> > /release +
> > + /eigerstein
> > + /ladybug
> > + /oxyge
Am Montag, 30. April 2001 17:19 schrieben Sie:
> Everyone,
> I'm going to create the following directories in CVS on Thursday, unless
> there are objections.
>
> /release +
> + /eigerstein
> + /ladybug
> + /oxygen
> + /quercus
>
> /script +
> + /web
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-30 08:19 -0700
>/script +
> + /weblet
> + (etc.)
>
>I also want to remove the old website tree from CVS, and move weblet into
>the script tree.
Everyone,
I wrote weblet when I should have written sh-httpd. I also forgot to add
echowall to the script tree. He
36 matches
Mail list logo
