On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 15:09, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Mike;
>
> Am Freitag, 2. Februar 2007 20:09 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > I modified the rss branch aggregation display. Please let me know if
> > that is acceptable for the interim upgrade cycle.
>
> Yes it is - thx!
>
> >
> > BTW, you and the re
Mike;
Am Freitag, 2. Februar 2007 20:09 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Mike;
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2007 00:41 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > > I'll try to run my broken (not SF cron robust) rss feed script often.
> > > Would that suffice for now?
>
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Mike;
>
> Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2007 00:41 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > I'll try to run my broken (not SF cron robust) rss feed script often.
> > Would that suffice for now?
>
> That would help for now...
KP,
Done.
> > Note: I'll have t
Mike;
Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2007 00:41 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> I'll try to run my broken (not SF cron robust) rss feed script often.
> Would that suffice for now?
That would help for now...
> Note: I'll have to see if integrating the bering-uclibc content
> into the phpwebsite hu
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:17, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Montag, 29. Januar 2007 17:54 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:32, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > > >From a website visitors view the LEAF pages looks like a graveyard of
> > > > ideas
> > >
> > > and projects - 4 out 5 projects
Am Montag, 29. Januar 2007 17:54 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:32, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > >From a website visitors view the LEAF pages looks like a graveyard of
> > > ideas
> >
> > and projects - 4 out 5 projects does not show a life sign since 2004 -
> > which is twelve "inte
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Charles,
> Is basic still available for me to use as a test/beta site?
Sure, although I may have to (re)-configure things. Let me know if you
have any issues logging in or whatever.
--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 10:24, Martin Hejl wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Martin or I should probably contact Vladimir, and inquire if the
> > leaf-wisp-dist mailing list is still necessary.
>
> leaf-wisp-dist currently has 150 subscribers, but it's extremely low
> traffic (last message from November
Hi Mike,
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Martin or I should probably contact Vladimir, and inquire if the
> leaf-wisp-dist mailing list is still necessary.
leaf-wisp-dist currently has 150 subscribers, but it's extremely low
traffic (last message from November, as far as I can see).
I don't have an issue with
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 13:23, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> But I guess it's worse than you think; if they even read leaf-devel, which I
> consider as minimum of engagement, they might have responded themself, if
> they think it's a value to be part of LEAF and maintainig a webpage there.
KP,
Martin o
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 09:01, Mike Noyes wrote:
> I'd like to install Mediawiki and Drupal for the LEAF website on SF.
> Drupal as a replacement for PhpWebSite, and Mediawiki as a replacement
> for our long gone developer shell section on SF.
>
> Note: I still need to figure out why xpath (
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 18:30, Larry Platzek wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone else feel uncomfortable with this situation and representation
> > of
> > the LEAF project?
> >
> Yes, it does not look good!
> Not sure what should be done about the problem.
Larry
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:32, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> >From a website visitors view the LEAF pages looks like a graveyard of ideas
> and projects - 4 out 5 projects does not show a life sign since 2004 - which
> is twelve "internet years" ago.
>
> Only one is active, but that isn't reflected on
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Oxygen is put on very deep hold - David Douthitt from time to time
> explains interest that something will happen, but then it stops.
That sums it up about right, I'd say...
I like the idea of a historical archive. I've more or less figured
that any new distro will be a
Hi Larry;
Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 03:30 schrieb Larry Platzek:
> Hi KP,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:32:48 +0100
> > From: KP Kirchdoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [leaf-devel] outdated LEAF deriv
Hi KP,
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:32:48 +0100
> From: KP Kirchdoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [leaf-devel] outdated LEAF derivatives
>
> Hi;
>
> while doing some maintenance on the LEAF Bering-uClibc websi
Evening All,
With all due respect to the suspended projects and their
owners/leaders/contributors, I agree.
To the new visitor to the site, I would have thought the latest news is
PXE being updated a year ago, not ver. 3 of Bering uClibc being released
last month. If you look in the Announcemen
17 matches
Mail list logo
