For those keeping score, it seems that a firewall
article made slashdot and leaf-project is suggested in
a lot the replies, as are several others.
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/03/04/0047215.shtml?tid=172
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Monday 04 March 2002 10:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For those keeping score, it seems that a firewall
> article made slashdot and leaf-project is suggested in
> a lot the replies, as are several others.
>
> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/03/04/0047215.shtml?tid=172
It appears that Brian Bo
At 2002-03-04 08:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>For those keeping score, it seems that a firewall
>article made slashdot and leaf-project is suggested in
>a lot the replies, as are several others.
>
>http://slashdot.org/articles/02/03/04/0047215.shtml?tid=172
Steven,
Thanks for the heads up.
Mike Noyes wrote:
> At 2002-03-04 08:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> For those keeping score, it seems that a firewall
>> article made slashdot and leaf-project is suggested in
>> a lot the replies, as are several others.
>>
>> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/03/04/0047215.shtml?tid=172
>
In order to stave off some of the future /. fallout,
I'd like to spend some time this week fixing the most
important Docs that need fixing.
What are the most important Docs that need fixing?
There's quite a few. So I'm asking anyone who recalls
something bad/sad/unfinished to let me(us) kno
On Monday 04 March 2002 15:10, Matt Schalit wrote:
> I hope our Docs are in order so we can refer them rather than have
> to repeat things we've already hashed out. If I get motivated this
> week, and I intend to, I'm going to work on JN's sshd, tinydns, and
> dnscache docs which should take abo
guitarlynn wrote:
> I got around 14 more FAQ's updated, formatted, and submitted over the
> weekend. 3 more are almost ready and pending author approval of the
> changes.
Way to go. It must have been pretty funny, reading some of the old
stuff in there.
> Mike is more than buried right
On Monday 04 March 2002 15:33, Matt Schalit wrote:
> guitarlynn wrote:
> > I got around 14 more FAQ's updated, formatted, and submitted over
> > the weekend. 3 more are almost ready and pending author approval of
> > the changes.
>
> Way to go. It must have been pretty funny, reading some of the
Any desired changes or is this acceptable to everyone to submit???
Thx,
~Lynn
> start of FAQ ##
>
> Q. If I want help troubleshooting a connectivity failure with my LEAF
> router, what information you you need from me?
>
> A. The exact information n
At 2002-03-04 16:16 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
>Any desired changes or is this acceptable to everyone to submit???
Lynn,
Can I have another day to look at your proposed changes?
BTW, great job on the FAQs. :-)
> > start of FAQ ##
> >
> > Q. If I want
On Monday 04 March 2002 16:33, Mike Noyes wrote:
> At 2002-03-04 16:16 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
> >Any desired changes or is this acceptable to everyone to submit???
>
> Lynn,
> Can I have another day to look at your proposed changes?
Absolutely!
Any comments, suggestions, or whatever are desir
Everyone,
I'm very close to completing a reconstruction of our phpWebSite. I'm just
cleaning up the xhtml on our stories. Please take a look at the
reconstruction, and let me know if you see any glaring problems. Note: I
know there are a couple of missing menu items, but everything else should
guitarlynn wrote:
> Any desired changes or is this acceptable to everyone to submit???
>
> Thx,
> ~Lynn
Oh, I could probably find a few thing or too
What I'll do is post my changes/corrections inside
rows of = signs. Any comments to you or other will
be nearby. Some of the fixes are only
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, guitarlynn wrote:
>
> Any desired changes or is this acceptable to everyone to submit???
[...]
> > 3.1 How to Get Your Diagnostic Information Into a Post
This title is inappropriately placed. The content of the section is
"Important information to include in a post". It
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> I'm very close to completing a reconstruction of our phpWebSite. I'm
> just cleaning up the xhtml on our stories. Please take a look at the
> reconstruction, and let me know if you see any glaring problems. Note: I
> know there are a couple of missing menu items,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Matt Schalit wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Everyone,
> > I'm very close to completing a reconstruction of our phpWebSite. I'm
> > just cleaning up the xhtml on our stories. Please take a look at the
> > reconstruction, and let me know if you see any glaring problems. Note: I
At 2002-03-04 17:45 -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
>On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Matt Schalit wrote:
>
> > Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > Everyone,
> > > I'm very close to completing a reconstruction of our phpWebSite.
> > > I'm just cleaning up the xhtml on our stories. Please take a look
> > > at the reconstruction,
Mike,
The site looks nice. I am wondering about this link
http://leaf.steinkuehler.net/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=9&page_id=2.;
Shouldn't the other variants of LEAF be put on equal footing as
Dachstein and Oxygen? They are in the left panel below the
Releases/Branches, but not in the main page.
At 2002-03-04 20:28 -0700, Greg Morgan wrote:
>The site looks nice. I am wondering about this link
>http://leaf.steinkuehler.net/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=9&page_id=2.;
>
>Shouldn't the other variants of LEAF be put on equal footing as
>Dachstein and Oxygen? They are in the left panel below the
Thank you all for following this thread. We are hosting something this week
for a bunch of kids from Yellowknife, 5500Km north-west from here and I it
kind of has an impact on my schedule :-)
>Message: 1
>From: "Luis.F.Correia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 19:
Hello all;
this might be discussed before, but I haven't found anything useful
on the list.
Problem description:
I want the Dachstein router to send mails, e.g ip-address after
reboot.
ipmail should do it, but I get an error "error parsing sender
address"
I think that $user in POSIXness.m
Mike Noyes wrote:
> There will be content upgrades after I complete the phpWebSite upgrade.
> Right now I'm only concerned with duplication/close approximation of the
> current content.
Dig dig dig. I reviewed your original message and missed/forgot what I
was doing while wandering around the ne
Ya know, I think it is time to change this
current
Project Goals.
Create an inclusive environment for current developers of the Linux
Router Project to release their modifications to the public. Support
continued development of Linux Router Project derived LEAF images and
p
23 matches
Mail list logo
