On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:19:58PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>[1] Should I have separate trees for different underlying versions of
>net-snmp? For example, I committed net-snmp v4.2.4. I am contemplating
>building and committing both v4.2.5 and the totally different
>distribution v5.x.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:01:27PM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>CVS is designed to handle directories full of information... so a
>directory tree of html documents is a natural thing to enter.
>
>An idea...
>
> net-snmp/
>README.txt
>packa
salut jacques
you need:
- image from
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/leaf/Bering_1.0-rc3_img_bering_1680.bin?d
ownload
- pptpd.lrp from
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/pptpd.lrp
- patched pppd from
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/p
>George,
>David has a proposed solution for building our releases/branches from
>cvs. It's similar to the BSD ports system. Any feedback you have on
>David's proposed src build solution is welcome.
>
>http://cvs.leaf-project.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/ddouthitt/base/
This looks excellent!
Anyone,
Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
script functional?
# Verify that all files are lowercase, except Makefiles
if ((substr($_, 0, 8) ne "Makefile") and (lc($_) ne $_)) {
print "All filenames must be completely lowercase except ";
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Jacques Nilo wrote:
>Le Samedi 13 Juillet 2002 07:55, George Georgalis a écrit :
>> Is Bering GNU?
>>
>> I'm beginning to have my doubts. Where is /usr/src/linux/.config?
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/rc3/
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Anyone,
> Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
> script functional?
Yes, absolutely yes; provided that either all of the lines are
completely _removed_ or completely commented out.
> # Verify that all files are lowercase, except Makefiles
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> >
> > Anyone,
> > Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
> > script functional?
>
> Yes, absolutely yes; provided that either all of the lines are
> completely _removed_ or completely comme
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:47:58AM +0200, Etienne Charlier wrote:
>0. It's quite amazing that such a great product has been developed
>and integrated by a few people during part time ( when do they sleep
>??? )
Yes it is a fantastic project. I only want the distribution presented in
a way th
On 17 Jul 2002 09:11:44 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
> Hmm, then what did I do wrong in rev 1.2? I used vi to dd out the lines
> below, and you ended up with a broken pipe from the server last night.
I am not sure about the broken pipe, but if you need more
evidence it *should* work, see below. My ap
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:41, David Douthitt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > I think a system similar to "BSD Ports" or "Gentoo Portage" would be
> > great. David already has sample implementation available.
> >
> > http://cvs.leaf-project.org/cgi-bin/vi
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> > Mike Noyes wrote:
> > >
> > > Anyone,
> > > Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
> > > script functional?
> >
> > Yes, absolutely yes; provided that either all of the lines are
> > co
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 09:54, Brad Fritz wrote:
>
> On 17 Jul 2002 09:11:44 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > Hmm, then what did I do wrong in rev 1.2? I used vi to dd out the lines
> > below, and you ended up with a broken pipe from the server last night.
>
> I am not sure about the broken pipe, but
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 09:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:58, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> > > Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Anyone,
> > > > Will removing the following lines from enforce_naming leave the perl
> > > > script functional?
> >
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:47:58AM +0200, Etienne Charlier wrote:
[...]
> >3 You seem very upset by not being able to {use | install} bering on your
> > system and you feel better if you can put the responsability on someone
> >else.
>
> I'm usin
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:34, Mike Noyes wrote:
> leaf/CVSROOT/enforce_naming rev 1.3
> http://cvs.leaf-project.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/CVSROOT/
Everyone,
Our enforce_naming is now at rev 1.4, and lowercase name enforcement
should be disabled. Please let me know if you experience any problems
Below is a little script to mount and extract an image in a way that will
allow for editing and repackaging of the lrp modules.
It uses tmp files but eventually creates (replaces) a directory called
lrp-super, which contains a directory for each lrp module and the root
filesystem per the package
On 17 Jul 2002 10:24:21 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
> Brad,
> Thanks for the proof. The broken pipe may have been a coincidence, but I
> thought I should check before trying this again.
Almost always better to be safe than sorry, I suppose. :)
> My diff doesn't look right (diff output below). The s
Everyone,
A request for Anubis support was mentioned to me this morning. Has
anyone taken a look at it?
http://anubis.sourceforge.net/
It may allow SMTP+TLS support for internal mail clients that don't
support TLS encryption.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoye
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 10:57, Brad Fritz wrote:
> I also double-checked the r1.1 to r1.2 diff[1] from last night,
> and I don't see anything wrong or any changes that should have
> resulted in the broken pipe error.
Brad,
Thanks for taking another look at the file. I committed the changes
again.
Le Mercredi 17 Juillet 2002 15:15, Stefan a écrit :
Hi Stefan:
Thanks for this very precise description. I'll try to look at that before the
end of the week.
Two complementary questions:
1/ Could you confirm that this setting was working OK with rc1
2/ Could you give me the command (from the clie
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:56:31PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
> Below is a little script to mount and extract an image in a way that will
> allow for editing and repackaging of the lrp modules.
Every script is a solution to a problem; I don't see the problem, but
anyway...
> #!/bin/sh
>
>
I've been looking at some things, and updated
syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
current versions.
I've noticed that CVS can be a major pain, especially with
renaming files, or deleting or moving directories.
Anyway, there are a few updates to the ports-style
setup that need to
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
> Below is a little script to mount and extract an image in a way that will
> allow for editing and repackaging of the lrp modules.
This is neat. I normally extract the contents of the package I am
interested in, since I navigate the actual router fi
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:23, David Douthitt wrote:
> I've been looking at some things, and updated
> syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
> current versions.
>
> I've noticed that CVS can be a major pain, especially with
> renaming files, or deleting or moving directories.
David,
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:23, David Douthitt wrote:
> > I've been looking at some things, and updated
> > syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
> > current versions.
> >
> > I've noticed that CVS can be a major pain, especially with
> > renaming files, or delet
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 13:00, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:23, David Douthitt wrote:
> > > I've been looking at some things, and updated
> > > syslinux and e3 (in the CVS tree) to their apparent
> > > current versions.
> > >
> > > I've noticed t
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[ snip ]
> > I am starting to realize that, perhaps, I should take a directory based
> > approach to helices' cvs tree.
> >
> > I have not settled on any particular structure. However, I am wondering
> > about several th
Hi Mike
in case noone noticed until now..
there was a glitch in the perl script anyway, see the following test
luna > perl casetest.pl MakefilefoobarDDD
All filenames must be completely lowercase except Makefiles. (/)
All filenames must be completely lowercase except Makefiles.
Everyone,
Project members should subscribe to our leaf-cvs-commits list.
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-cvs-commits
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
---
This
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:21:32PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> > CVS is designed to handle directories full of information... so a
> > directory tree of html documents is a natural thing to enter.
> >
> > An idea...
> >
> > net-snmp/
> > README.txt
> >
[US Conferences, that is]
Anyone going to DefCon 10 in Las Vegas, NV, Aug 2-4, or to
11th Usenix Security Symposium, Aug 5-9, in San Francisco, CA?
Just wondering... Interesting that they're so close together
in time and space :-)
---
This
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:12, David Douthitt wrote:
> [US Conferences, that is]
>
> Anyone going to DefCon 10 in Las Vegas, NV, Aug 2-4, or to
> 11th Usenix Security Symposium, Aug 5-9, in San Francisco, CA?
>
> Just wondering... Interesting that they're so close together
> in time and space :-)
David Douthitt wrote:
[ snip ]
> My model has been the following:
>
> archives/
> .tar.gz
> .bz2
> ...
>
> iproute2/
> distinfo
> Makefile
> patches/
> .diff
> .diff
> ...
> work/ {temporary dir; created and used to
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:50, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> I've been considering using whatever structure I settle on as my
> development environment. I have cvs setup on my own network and hope to
> integrate leaf development into my other development projects. However,
> cvs doesn't lend itself
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:50, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> [2] Since cvs does not retain group, mode nor ownership attributes, [1]
> is further complicated and requires another kludge to correct directory
> and files attributes.
Michael,
This should only be an issue when exporting for public distri
Le Mardi 16 Juillet 2002 20:33, vous avez écrit :
Hi Vic
My UML doc is really outdated. I'll try to uptade it over the WE.
Basically you have to create your Bering LEAF fs yourself.
The procedure is as follow:
1/ creates a 2M minix file on the same dir as your linux-uml kernel
dd if=/dev/zero of
On 17 Jul 2002 15:23:22 -0700
"Mike Noyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:12, David Douthitt wrote:
> > [US Conferences, that is]
> >
> > Anyone going to DefCon 10 in Las Vegas, NV, Aug 2-4, or to
> > 11th Usenix Security Symposium, Aug 5-9, in San Francisco, CA?
> >
> >
On that note, it dawns on me to ask, "Any of you in the Portland area? I live in
Scappoose and work in Vancouver WA."
Richard Amerman
-Original Message-
From: Chad Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 7/17/2002 9:28 PM
To: Mike Noyes
39 matches
Mail list logo
