Hi Andrew,
My fault. Sorry about that. Fixed now.
dMb
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 23:29 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> During rebuild I found that dhcpcd is broken -
> upstream_resolv_conf_dir.patch is missing in CVS.
>
> --
> Nokia
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 22:31 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 22:01:17 schrieb Andrew:
> > 30.10.2010 22:44, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew:
> > >> 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > >>> Am Samstag, 30. Oktobe
Hi kp. Thanks for the feedback.
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 01:29 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hello;
>
> Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 22:15:46 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have added a lot more suggested structure to the main Wiki page for
> > the User Guide:
> > http://sourceforge.net
31.10.2010 13:45, davidMbrooke пишет:
> IMHO, if we plan to support multiple kernel variants "soon" (i.e. beta2
> or beta3) - and I do think that we should do that - then we should make
> the changes to buildtool to enable that "now", i.e. for beta1. Even if
> beta1 only ships with a single variant
Hi,
Like kp and Andrew I am running Bering-uClibc4 "in production" and it is
working well. IMHO no issues preventing a Beta release, but there are a
few annoyances I intend to fix as time allows:
- I get errors from snmpd like "ioctl 35123 returned -1". This is
because I have "long" interface
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:29 +0200, Andrew wrote:
>
> P.S. Also there is a new question against package management: I included
> pptp kernel module into accel-pptp package (and made modifications to
> scripts - to avoid duplication of modules in packages and moddb); also I
> planned to do same t
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 14:44:21 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:29 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> > P.S. Also there is a new question against package management: I included
> > pptp kernel module into accel-pptp package (and made modifications to
> > scripts - to avoid duplication o
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:55:46 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> Hi,
>
> Like kp and Andrew I am running Bering-uClibc4 "in production" and it is
> working well. IMHO no issues preventing a Beta release, but there are a
> few annoyances I intend to fix as time allows:
>
>- I get errors from snm
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:11 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:55:46 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> >
> >- A minor point, but Shorewall startup logs go
> > to /var/log/shorewall.log whereas Shorewall6 startup logs go
> > to /var/log/shorewall6-init.log (so IPv4 Shorewall
31.10.2010 15:44, davidMbrooke пишет:
>
> Personally, I vote for keeping Modules and Packages separate - i.e.
> Modules only in moddb.lrp and modules.tgz, never in package.lrp - and
> loading the right Modules by other means.
>
Ok. So we just change current behavior of parsing 'module' type records
Hi David;
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 17:26:54 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:11 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:55:46 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > >- A minor point, but Shorewall startup logs go
> > >
> > > to /var/log/shorewall.log whereas
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 18:06 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi David;
>
> Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 17:26:54 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:11 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:55:46 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > > >- A minor point, but Sh
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:04:14 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> Hi kp. Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 01:29 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hello;
> >
> > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 22:15:46 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have added a lot more suggested str
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew:
> 29.10.2010 20:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > - Shall we provide compiled packages, as we did with Bering-uClibc
> > ("packages page"), better ideas?
>
> IMHO it'll be good to provide separate packages and prebuilt full image
> - like it was
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew:
>
> Ok; I propose:
> - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing isn't
> needed - we can also put packages in contrib which we consider for testing
> or
15 matches
Mail list logo
