Been doing some reading, and I found a couple of interesting bits.
What appears to be a somewhat current HTB home page, with a fair amount of
documentation:
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/htbfaq.htm
Additionally, from the FAQ:
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument and tc parameters are
Joey
I am using tc only (not qos-htb) with the wondershaper as documented on the
shorewall site.
To start with, it failed too with IIRC similar problems. I finally had to
dig into the wondershaper code and found ash arithmetic problems settting
up the tc commands.
So I believe it is not tc
Hi Sean
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:18:55 -0500, Sean E. Covel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since this needs to be up-and-running quickly, and I'm doing it in my
spare time, I wanted to go the path of least resistance. How soon till
you implement?
I was hoping to do it sometime over the Christmas
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:07:18 -0500, Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The weblet config file has a setting for which networks can access
it. I tried setting it to 0.0.0.0 but that did not help.
What can I do to allow external requests to be answered by the
weblet?
I think weblet (sh-httpd) is
Hi all,
has anybody successfully used a USB keyboard with LEAF Bering ? As far as I
have understood it the input.o and keybdev.o modules are missing in the
modules package. I am just trying to build a Bering kernel myself along with
these modules, but I would happily use some pre-compiled stuff
Erich
Thanks for the input. I had read a thread or two discussing Wondershaper,
although admittedly, I haven't looked at it yet. I think that if this
continues to fail, I may dive into that project instead.
You mentioned that you made some arthmetic changes to the wondershaper code,
I am
Joey :
I'm using HTB with Bering 2.0 without problems.
I don't use wondershaper neither htb.init scripts since I use my own
made scripts with tc tool.
Reading in your first mail, you've wrote :
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root
but I think the correct sentece should be :
# tc qdisc add dev eth0
Hi folks,
I see in Tom's documentation for Shorewall that he runs Squid
transparently on a box in his DMZ rather than on his LAN, and I'm just
curious why?
Thank you, Happy Holidays!
Craig
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
To my knowledge, it shouldn't matter whether Squid, run as a proxy
server, is placed on the LAN side or the DMZ side (or NET side, for that
matter). If the box was run as an accelerator / reverse proxy, you'd
want to have it sit in the DMZ, presumably to protect the internal
network from a
Sorry for the double reply, but by putting the box in the DMZ, you could
avoid some unnecessary NAT.
Just a thought.
Ryan
Craig Caughlin wrote:
Hi folks,
I see in Tom's documentation for Shorewall that he runs Squid
transparently on a box in his DMZ rather than on his LAN, and I'm just
Craig Caughlin wrote:
Hi folks,
I see in Tom's documentation for Shorewall that he runs Squid
transparently on a box in his DMZ rather than on his LAN, and I'm just
curious why?
Without trying to speak for Tom, at least one to run Squid in a DMZ (or
some other network besides the main internal
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 01:09 pm, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
If the squid box was on the internal net, it would not be truely
transparent to the clients, who could easily tell their requests were
being proxied and answered by a local system. There would also be some
amount of
Wim,
Glad to be of service. Please let us know if you run into any other
snags.
Eric Kiser
-Original Message-
From: Wim Acke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:37 PM
To: Eric B Kiser; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Save Zebra
I have done something similar but not using a DMZ. I simply added a second
Private network for the WiFi network using a normal NIC and a Separate
Wireless Access Point. Simply don't add any rules that will allow the two
networks to interact into your shorewall rules and you have 2 independent,
Julian,
Thank you so much. I knew I was overlooking something simple. It
works great now.
Thanks again,
Kory
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:21:55 +, Julian Church wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:07:18 -0500, Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The weblet config file has a setting for which
Thanks for the correction, but based on the documentation for the QoS under
Bering, I should be able to type the initial command, and get some response.
Instead I only get the error. I have defined the modules, as noted here:
firewall: -root-
# lsmod
Module PagesUsed by
sch_tbf
16 matches
Mail list logo
