Yeah, I know. I was more replying to someone else saying that WEP was
enough. It's clearly not.
The actual Access Point SHOULD work exactly like a standard ethernet
bridge/hub, so it should pass through the IPSec without issue. My
suggestion was more in the nature of here's how you get it up
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 09:24, George Metz wrote:
Yeah, I know. I was more replying to someone else saying that WEP was
enough. It's clearly not.
George,
Is NoCatAuth/NoCatSplash an acceptable solution to wireless security?
NoCat
http://nocat.net/
BTW, do we have a package for
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 10:16, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 09:24, George Metz wrote:
Yeah, I know. I was more replying to someone else saying that WEP was
enough. It's clearly not.
George,
Is NoCatAuth/NoCatSplash an acceptable solution to wireless security?
NoCat
Mike,
Not really. Actually, I'd PROBABLY consider using that as an additional
step, except that IIRC IPSec will handle all the auth. All this is
really doing is preventing unauthorized users from using your net
connection, whereas IPSec is actually establishing a tunnel, allowing
you to send
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 12:26, George Metz wrote:
Not really. Actually, I'd PROBABLY consider using that as an additional
step, except that IIRC IPSec will handle all the auth. All this is
really doing is preventing unauthorized users from using your net
connection, whereas IPSec is actually
: Re: [leaf-user] CABLE + WIFI + IPSEC + WINDOWS + BERING = ???
Julian,
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 11:32, Julian Church wrote:
Hi Sean
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:02:35 -0500, Sean E. Covel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here is what I am proposing to do:
Cable Modem - Bering -- (Private Network) Current PC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean E. Covel
Sent: Tuesday, 16 Dec 2003 06:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Leaf User List
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] CABLE + WIFI + IPSEC + WINDOWS + BERING = ???
Julian,
On Mon, 2003-12-15
Sean:
I have a very similar setup to the one you propose. The only difference
is that my internet is delivered via dialup instead of cable modem. Other
than that (and that's a fairly small distinction), I've managed to get it
up and running (with a goodish amount of help from the other list
: Re: [leaf-user] CABLE + WIFI + IPSEC + WINDOWS + BERING = ???
Sean:
I have a very similar setup to the one you propose. The only
difference
is that my internet is delivered via dialup instead of cable
modem. Other
than that (and that's a fairly small distinction), I've
managed
Hi Sean
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:18:55 -0500, Sean E. Covel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since this needs to be up-and-running quickly, and I'm doing it in my
spare time, I wanted to go the path of least resistance. How soon till
you implement?
I was hoping to do it sometime over the Christmas
without permission. All of our gear was from Alloy.
Andrew Gray
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean E. Covel
Sent: Tuesday, 16 Dec 2003 06:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Leaf User List
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] CABLE + WIFI + IPSEC + WINDOWS
Sean
At 10:02 15.12.2003 -0500, Sean E. Covel wrote:
Please stop me before I go running off down the wrong road!!!
Here's the situation: My sister-in-law is dying to get herself a laptop
and WIFI. They already have a cable modem and a virus-laden P2P, chat,
teenager PC in the house. They have
Hi Sean
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:02:35 -0500, Sean E. Covel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here is what I am proposing to do:
Cable Modem - Bering -- (Private Network) Current PC (Windows XP)
|
--- DMZ -- WAP -- Laptop (Windows XP)
The question is, of course, how to
Julian,
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 11:32, Julian Church wrote:
Hi Sean
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:02:35 -0500, Sean E. Covel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here is what I am proposing to do:
Cable Modem - Bering -- (Private Network) Current PC (Windows XP)
|
--- DMZ --
14 matches
Mail list logo
