Re: [leaf-user] many non contiguous subnets on the same interface

2003-10-25 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn maybe my drawing was not completely clear. The outer firewall is NATting whereas the inner is routing to keep the DMZ and the secure network apart. We were planning to provide server hosting for remote networks but the design included dual hosted servers with a SAN device on the seconf

Re: [leaf-user] many non contiguous subnets on the same interface

2003-10-23 Thread Lynn Avants
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 02:26 am, Erich Titl wrote: Hi I am deploying Bering 1.2 systems as firewalls/VPN tunnel endpoints to build what they call extruded subnets in freeswan jargon Here a little bit of ASCII art client net 10.230.60.0/24 (for historical reasons) ¦ 10.230.60.1

Re: [leaf-user] many non contiguous subnets on the same interface

2003-10-23 Thread Erich Titl
Lynn At 23:56 22.10.2003 -0500, Lynn Avants wrote: On Wednesday 22 October 2003 02:26 am, Erich Titl wrote: Hi I am deploying Bering 1.2 systems as firewalls/VPN tunnel endpoints to build what they call extruded subnets in freeswan jargon Here a little bit of ASCII art client net

Re: [leaf-user] many non contiguous subnets on the same interface

2003-10-23 Thread Lynn Avants
On Thursday 23 October 2003 02:50 am, Erich Titl wrote: [...] There is no NAT on the inner firewall, but then there is no NETBIOS traffic either through the firewall. Hmmm... so it is running proxy-arp on the inner firewall (assuming this is the only way you can filter w/o routing). I know

[leaf-user] many non contiguous subnets on the same interface

2003-10-22 Thread Erich Titl
Hi I am deploying Bering 1.2 systems as firewalls/VPN tunnel endpoints to build what they call extruded subnets in freeswan jargon Here a little bit of ASCII art client net 10.230.60.0/24 (for historical reasons) ¦ 10.230.60.1 Bering / customer VPN endpoint xx.xx.xx.xx (any old public address)