Re: [LEDE-DEV] Proposal to sign all commits

On 16-05-06 08:28 PM, Kus wrote: > Daniel, I like what you said. I hinted something like that in the original > message. Er, sorry which part - I think you mean about fast-forward only and not the ideal world where everything is always tested no matter who it's from? Regards, Daniel > > I

Re: [LEDE-DEV] RFC: Throughput testing results.

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 05/06/2016 12:05 PM, David Lang wrote: >> >> On Fri, 6 May 2016, Ben Greear wrote: >> >>> On 05/06/2016 10:20 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: Ben Greear writes: > I am

Re: [LEDE-DEV] RFC: Throughput testing results.

On Fri, 6 May 2016, Ben Greear wrote: On 05/06/2016 12:05 PM, David Lang wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2016, Ben Greear wrote: On 05/06/2016 10:20 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: Ben Greear writes: I am interested in feedback on the testing output. My goal is to add a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] RFC: Throughput testing results.

On Fri, 6 May 2016, Ben Greear wrote: On 05/06/2016 10:20 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: Ben Greear writes: I am interested in feedback on the testing output. My goal is to add a few more different hardware configurations and then do nightly (or at least weekly)

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC] A change to the way packages are built

On 16-05-05 04:16 AM, Michal Hrusecky wrote: > David Lang - 18:20 4.05.16 wrote: >> Debian has ... > > Just for the sake of discussion and inspiration, how openSUSE does it's > rolling > release. We have OBS, which is server software, connected to multiple > builders. [snip] Thank you David

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Proposal to sign all commits

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > Regarding signing commits with GPG key, it would be nice to recommend it but > making it a requirement sounds like a barrier. I'd argue such a barrier is OK if we want to quickly increase the size of the team of people with commit access. I

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Why technical elitism is contrary to stated goal of community

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 11:48 -0400, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: > > As I said, the issue is not with 'only good bug reports', it's with 'we > > can ensure only good bug reports by making it a pain to report bugs at all'. > > I'd also like to point out that if the approach is being taken on the

[LEDE-DEV] Why technical elitism is contrary to stated goal of community

Hi all, I have noticed that some of the policies of this project are already veering towards a brand of technical elitism that I feel is completely contrary to the stated goal of having a stronger community. A strong community welcomes 'outsiders' and noobs and helps them find their place in the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Proposal to sign all commits

Hi, > I am concerned that git signing gives little, if any value, while making > it harder to contribute (and making it easier to contribute is one of > the *stated* goals of LEDE) and is another example of a tendency toward > a particular brand of technical elitism that will kill this project if

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

Might I submit that my impression is that Kaloz (at least) holds infrastructure hostage to maintain control, and that the fundamental problem here is that OpenWrt is *not* democratic and ignores what people who were ones visibly working on openwrt want and overrides their wishes because he/they

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

On 6 May 2016 at 03:53, Luka Perkov wrote: >>On 2016-05-05 20:22, mbm wrote: >>> On 5/5/2016 7:40 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: Many of the changes that we previously tried to introduce were often squashed by internal disagreements. Resulting discussions often turned