Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 16:55 -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:22 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote: > > It's a Development List ... no place for corporate agendas. > > I think you are making a good point here, being that there is only one > lede list, presently, and

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>>>> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic >>>>> behavior. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lan

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

ks on something doesn't make it evil. >> >> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic >> >> behavior. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >> >>> Is it really pushing a corpor

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

t;>> >>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>> >>> David Lang >>> >>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: >>> >>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500 >>>> From: L. D. Pinney <

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

n't make it evil. David Lang On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500 From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? Postings to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

<ldpin...@gmail.com> >>> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> >>> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? >>> >>> Just becau

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

from the >>> results. >>> If benefiting from the results makes it that the LEDE project doesn't >>> want >>> to hear from you, the project will die _really_ fast. >>> >>> I hope your hostile attitude doesn't spread. >>> >>&

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. Yes of course large cor

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:10:36 -0500 >> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> >> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> >> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >> >> Subject: Re

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

hostile attitude doesn't spread. David Lang On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:10:36 -0500 From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV]

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

mail.com> >> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? >> >> >> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical >> development issues. >> >>

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical development issues. Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail list etiquette such as found here : http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

Felix Fietkau wrote: > > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by > > Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. > > As a next step, we recommend to organize a workshop, at a practical > > location and time, where we

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

On 2016-05-27 01:43, Delbar Jos wrote: > Hi all, > > At Technicolor we have followed with great interest the recent > proposals to enhance OpenWrt with an open source solution for TR-069 > remote management. As one of the world's largest vendors of modems > and routers for carrier applications,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

David Lang wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote: > > > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by > > Felix, > > Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. As a next > > step, we recommend to organize a workshop, at a