Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.3.38-rc1 on Monday?

2014-02-19 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi John, Does the attached patch for LedgerSMB/AA.pm fix the subcent-paid transactions showing up in the transaction summary screen? If so, I propose we apply this and back out of the original "details is default" patch. How about that? Bye, Erik. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Erik Huels

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Any objection to releasing 1.3.38 tomorrow?

2014-02-19 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, Just sent a proposal for resolution of the outstanding issue where not everybody receives the "summary->details" default change with equal appreciation :-) Let's work out a resolution to that and release .38 after that. Thanks for the heads-up on having to close the issue though! Bye,

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Any objection to releasing 1.3.38 tomorrow?

2014-02-19 Thread Chris Travers
Ok, so let's do an rc2 with these changes undone and with Istvan's committed changes for VAT numbers on the invoice. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Just sent a proposal for resolution of the outstanding issue where not > everyb

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Any objection to releasing 1.3.38 tomorrow?

2014-02-19 Thread Pongrácz István
One note regarding the customer's VAT number on the invoice: the user should upgrade his template to include the tax_id as he/she wishes. If one needs that, it is possible to wherever one wants, just using: I already tested it in 1.3.x, but not yet in 1.4. Maybe this night I will have time to