Re: [LU] FFS

> Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:09:45 +0100 > From: Paul Cundell > Subject: Re: [LU] FFS > > Seems to me that Byram is right then, take a pay cut and play for a mediocre > championship side or look for pastures new? I know what I'd be doing. And isn't it inevitable

Re: [LU] FFS

On 23 September 2015 at 07:09, Phill Shields wrote: > I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign > a new contract offering less money than he is on at the moment. > I do. Murphy was offered a contract on less money. And Accepted.

Re: [LU] FFS

Hay reported that . Cellino is a very strange man. Dr. Michael Benjamin, Community Psychiatrist, +972505317772 m...@myray.com http://www.myray. com On 23 Sep 2015 14:11, "Phill Shields" wrote: > I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign

Re: [LU] FFS

I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign a new contract offering less money than he is on at the moment. Sounds like his agent is at work here. It's been pretty clear for some time that he has no desire to remain at the club and wants a big money move. I'd let

Re: [LU] FFS

I do. The club want to cash in and elicit sentiment like this from the fans. He's been wank because he's unsettled. MOT Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Sep 2015, at 21:09, Phill Shields wrote: > > I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to

Re: [LU] FFS

I do too. Mind you if he was on a salary that was over inflated in relation to his value to the team then I think it's fair enough to offer him less money, just don't expect him to stay and don't be upset when he tells you to f*ck off. You're not going to see the "one club" player these days

Re: [LU] FFS

And longer terms. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Andy Clayton wrote: > > On 23 September 2015 at 07:09, Phill Shields > wrote: > >> I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign >> a new

Re: [LU] FFS

I'd guess Gary Kelly was on a lot more than Byram has been offered. On 23 Sep 2015 14:59, "Jeremy Adams" wrote: > > I do too. Mind you if he was on a salary that was over inflated in relation to his value to the team then I think it's fair enough to offer him less

Re: [LU] FFS

True but we were playing in a different league at that point. I guess I'm saying I'm all for sticking to a budget when it comes to wages and not doing a Riddle, but then don't complain when you can't retain certain employees. From: Paul Cundell

Re: [LU] FFS

This is classic Cellino - it's the redders thing all over again. Slag him off to try to turn the fans against him so they'll accept its for the best when he gets sold to a premiership team. He hasn't played well this season but as others have said, he's playing out of position and the owners

Re: [LU] FFS

He's 22 - birthday a week ago - so we'll get a fee for him no matter who takes him... Ed. On 23 September 2015 at 17:08, Phill Shields wrote: > I am not deluded enough to think that for a young player like Byram he has > ambitions that rest beyond my club and I have

Re: [LU] FFS

I am not deluded enough to think that for a young player like Byram he has ambitions that rest beyond my club and I have to reluctantly accept that. I still think Byram is playing a the system and his agent is at it in the background. Cellino is maintaining that he will not sell him in January

Re: [LU] FFS

Correct Ed but it will be fuck all. Sent by Outlook for Android On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM -0700, "Ed Morrish" wrote: He's 22 - birthday a week ago - so we'll get a fee for him no matter who takes him... Ed. On 23 September 2015 at 17:08, Phill Shields