[LU] Fw: Ground ownership

2016-03-04 Thread Rick Duniec (@ntl)
- Original Message - From: "Rick Duniec (@ntl)" To: "{broken-address} Nicholas Armit" Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Ground ownership and if that original arrangement is still enforceable in law

Re: [LU] Ground ownership

2016-03-04 Thread {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
Oh so it is the "club" that has the right to buy. Oh well. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 4, 2016, at 12:22 PM, > wrote: > > Under the terms of the 2004 sale, the club has the right to re-purchase > Elland Road at any time, though the price

Re: [LU] Ground ownership

2016-03-04 Thread tim.whelan
Under the terms of the 2004 sale, the club has the right to re-purchase Elland Road at any time, though the price goes up every year according to a set formula.But the current owners are not obliged to sell to any other party. Cellino could make them an offer, but the chances are they would ask

Re: [LU] Cellino poll

2016-03-04 Thread tim.whelan
It looks like the pro-Cellino mob on Facebook have now discovered it!I'm flattered by the comment "Vote yes if you want mass still here", but someone obviously thinks my humble site has got far more power than it really has! Tim W. On Friday, 4 March 2016, 13:39, "Rick Duniec (@ntl)"

Re: [LU] Fw: Worth a read - moscowhite from Sqaure Ball - his take on finances

2016-03-04 Thread Richard Walker
er the losses. What these accounts ought to do is >> bring the discussion around to Cellino to a new, sharper point. Rather than >> asking, ‘is he the man to blame?’, we should be asking, ‘is he the man to >> solve this?’ •• Sign uphere to get new articles by Moscowhite by email.

Re: [LU] Fw: Worth a read - moscowhite from Sqaure Ball - his take on finances

2016-03-04 Thread bruvvaleeluv
4, Midleton Gate, Guildford Business Park > GU2 8SG, United Kingdom > Phone +44 1483 30 36 66 > Mobile +447782326395 > Office +447782326395 > david.a.bar...@ericsson.com > www.ericsson.com > >Legal entity: Ericsson Telecommunications Limited, registered office in >

[LU] Ground ownership

2016-03-04 Thread {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
From an article (http://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/leedsunited/news/42199/?: "This legacy of debt explains why Cellino is refusing to repurchase Elland Road and Thorp Arch until he gains complete control of the club of GFH make a contribution, as the acquisition would have to be in the name

Re: [LU] Fw: Worth a read - moscowhite from Sqaure Ball - his take on finances

2016-03-04 Thread Richard Naef
well that's made me even more miserable. > > > > Interesting take on finances - especailly HRMC and other court cases ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email

[LU] Fw: Worth a read - moscowhite from Sqaure Ball - his take on finances

2016-03-04 Thread nat...@sky.com
erms set out atwww.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 2367 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/leedslist/attachments/20160304/d

Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion

2016-03-04 Thread Matt Anderson
Bonuses for players is surely normal and a good idea, it’s the GFH bit that’s shocking! No wonder they haven’t gone -Original Message- From: E Walsh [mailto:ejwa...@indigo.ie] Sent: 04 March 2016 11:30 To: Matt Anderson; nat...@sky.com; 'Leeds List' Subject: Re: [LU] £30Million "hit"

Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion

2016-03-04 Thread John Boocock
I'd like to know for how many seasons these amounts are in play for. If it's only one season then Cellino is right to play a waiting game and only to employ people who have previously played football as a hobby when they were recovering from having a tin leg fitted. It also suggests that yet

Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion

2016-03-04 Thread E Walsh
Seeing that promotion is a distant dream-at best. is this not irrelevant? -Original Message- From: Matt Anderson Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 10:35 AM To: nat...@sky.com ; 'Leeds List' Subject: Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion And then probably shipped out to Ipswich or

Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion

2016-03-04 Thread Matt Anderson
And then probably shipped out to Ipswich or somewhere. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of nat...@sky.com Sent: 04 March 2016 10:33 To: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion Not a disincnetive

Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion

2016-03-04 Thread nat...@sky.com
Not a disincnetive for the players - as I read it- they would get a £8m bonus between them ! From: "bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk" To: "Rick Duniec (@ntl)" Cc: Leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Friday, 4 March 2016, 10:25 Subject: Re: [LU]

Re: [LU] £30Million "hit" on promotion

2016-03-04 Thread bruvvaleeluv
A part explanation for why they play like sunday footballers half the time? If the figures are true, that's one hell of a disincentive! Sent from my iPad > On 4 Mar 2016, at 10:06, Rick Duniec (@ntl) wrote: > > LEEDS UNITED faces a promotion penalty of nearly £30m - if it

[LU] Club accounts

2016-03-04 Thread Simon McNally
YorkshireEveningPost (@LeedsNews) 04/03/2016, 07:30 #LeedsUnited long way from operating at a surplus suggest 2014-15 accounts http://tinyurl.com/htzruc8 #lufc #lufclive http://twitter.com/LeedsNews/status/705656564523233282/photo/1 Shared via TweetCaster (http://tweetcaster.com) Sent from