Re: [LU] Rotherham

Could be an option but given the wingers we have i don't see how he would get a go? It would be possible to have 3 at the back with Rodon, Struik and Ampadu then Archie and Firpo at wing backs ? However especially at home we don't defend much so it is working as it is  Dave  On Sunday, 11

[LU] Rotherham

Well that was easy.  A very straightforward 3-0 with both their efforts comjng from set pieces when already 3 down and both saved by Meslier without too much fuss. The only other scare was when a back pass almost went past Meslier  Before the game the general vibe was good , with fans talking of

Re: [LU] Rotherham Game

Kev, I was looking to see him yanked off and something less wooden coming on as a replacement (after about 10 minues to be frank). My hearts sinks when I see him any where near the squad. Can't they give him a job in the club shop or something else more suited to his talents. On 25/11/2023

Re: [LU] Rotherham Game

Tbf, again, they are mostly the same players - hence, I assume, Farke's safety first approach, but what do I know. Personally, I blame Sky comms for telling us that we'd always won when scoring first. On Sat, 25 Nov 2023, 22:43 , wrote: > I think that’s a fair point Paul, although there was

Re: [LU] Rotherham Game

I think that’s a fair point Paul, although there was plenty of evidence to suggest the tide might turn yesterday? I don’t think I was alone in not being exactly gushing about some of our defender’s ‘abilities’ - all the old doubts came back to worry me :-( Sent from my iPad

Re: [LU] Rotherham Game

Totally agree. It is very frustrating. Nick On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 05:06:56 PM EST, Paul Cundell wrote: I think we're in danger of very quickly forgetting how badly we were shipping goals pre-Farke. On Sat, 25 Nov 2023, 21:46 Nicholas Armit via Leedslist, wrote:  Totally

Re: [LU] Rotherham Game

I think we're in danger of very quickly forgetting how badly we were shipping goals pre-Farke. On Sat, 25 Nov 2023, 21:46 Nicholas Armit via Leedslist, < leedslist@gn.apc.org> wrote: > Totally agree! It is very frustrating. > Nick > On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 10:55:15 AM EST, John

Re: [LU] Rotherham Game

Totally agree! It is very frustrating. Nick On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 10:55:15 AM EST, John Lee via Leedslist wrote: I think this insistence on re-setting the entire team every time we get possession, by playing it back to Cooper/Rodon/Meslier cripples one of our key

Re: [LU] Rotherham Game

I think this insistence on re-setting the entire team every time we get possession, by playing it back to Cooper/Rodon/Meslier cripples one of our key strengths - our attacking speed. I would definitely have Gray in the middle, and I hope Farke is beginning to see that this ultra- cautious

[LU] Rotherham Game

Last night showed to me how much we need the creative midfield player to turn promising positions into the type of chances that even our strikers can’t miss. Then pick whichever of Rutter, Piroe and Bamford looks like they may eventually score a goal. None of them does at the moment. Bamford in

Re: [LU] Rotherham

View from armchair : At half time I was pretty depressed and contemplating 5 defeats in 6 and Bielsa's master plan starting to fall apart. Second half, Roberts came on to play alongside Roofe, we played the game at an increased tempo and Rotherham just couldn't live with us. Everyone who had

Re: [LU] Rotherham

http://bluebuckets.co/leeds-rotherham/ ttfn Richard -Original Message- From: Leedslist On Behalf Of Robert Heath Sent: 26 January 2019 16:03 To: Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham How are you watching it? On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 4:56 PM Richard Walker via

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Yes. Sent from my iPad > On 26 Jan 2019, at 16:02, Robert Heath wrote: > > How are you watching it? > >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 4:56 PM Richard Walker via Leedslist >> wrote: >> 1 down half-time and you have to say another very poor half from us. There's >> no doubt this game is far from

Re: [LU] Rotherham

How are you watching it? On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 4:56 PM Richard Walker via Leedslist < leedslist@gn.apc.org> wrote: > 1 down half-time and you have to say another very poor half from us. > There's no doubt this game is far from over but yet again we've had the > lion's share of possession but

[LU] Rotherham

1 down half-time and you have to say another very poor half from us. There's no doubt this game is far from over but yet again we've had the lion's share of possession but have only had one half decent shot from Harrison which the keeper easily saved to show for our efforts. Roofe has hardly

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Thats the one BUT the move has 5 or 6 passes before that From: Vijay Bhakta To: nat...@sky.com Cc: "" Sent: Monday, 20 August 2018, 10:02 Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham around 1m 45s into this clip..    http://www.skysports.com/football/leeds-vs-rotherham/report/392573 Vij

Re: [LU] Rotherham

chleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> > To: Nigel Sykes > Cc: Leeds List > Sent: Monday, 20 August 2018, 7:45 > Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham > > Yes indeed he did as he tried to close down the game > > > On 19 Aug 2018, at 18:25, Nigel Sykes wrote: > > > >

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Dave wrote: > If you have not seen it yet, it is worth trying to track down the 'best > goal ever (nearly)' by Saiz. You need to find the full clip that shows > 10-15 passes then a shot by Samu that is cleared off the line. Agreed! I said to my mates at the time - that was probably one of the

Re: [LU] Rotherham

watch this clip Dave From: {broken-address} Richard Walker To: Nigel Sykes Cc: Leeds List Sent: Monday, 20 August 2018, 7:45 Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham Yes indeed he did as he tried to close down the game > On 19 Aug 2018, at 18:25, Nigel Sykes wrote: > > -Origina

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Yes indeed he did as he tried to close down the game > On 19 Aug 2018, at 18:25, Nigel Sykes wrote: > > -Original Message- > Richard Walker wrote: > Can't remember anyone else coming on ? > > Pontus came on (for a midfielder) near the end. > > Nigel > (the Dublin one) > >

Re: [LU] Rotherham

-Original Message- Richard Walker wrote: Can't remember anyone else coming on ? Pontus came on (for a midfielder) near the end. Nigel (the Dublin one) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] Rotherham

I watched the game in a drunken haze but here's my memory.  Rotherham are a different team from what we have faced so far, in fact I'd say they are a proper championship team. Big lads who get stuck in and then one or two players who can break and hurt you. They were well organised in the first

[LU] Rotherham

Well (eventually) this was the start to the New Year that we were all hoping for , as we scored 3 at home for the first time this season - something we managed only once in 2016 (v Reading), and to cap it all we kept (yet another) clean sheet. There really is the feeling that we are going

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Cheers. My Villa report was even more optimistic however that was alcohol fuelled. Yes I remember the Last Rotherham game when Redfearn was in charge, we lost 1-0. Progress has definitely been made. > On 2 Jan 2017, at 19:55, Damian Walsh wrote: > > Rich - please

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Rich - please don't take this as a put down ('coz it isn't) - but I think that your mail is up there with the most positive match reports that you've ever done. That plus: -I wasn't ever worried about us not winning and the only annoying let down was Reading scoring late on rather than Rotherham

[LU] Rotherham

For me this was a very important game for us because ithopefully told us a couple of home truths, if we didn’t know them already. 1) If we’re not on our game and are not tacticallyset up to compete we will struggle even against the weaker teams in thisleague. 2) Playing 2 wingers

Re: [LU] Rotherham

gt; Believe! MOT >>>> >>>>> On 26 Nov 2016 6:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What that man said >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my Windows 10 phone >>>>> >>>

Re: [LU] Rotherham

;>> >>> Believe! MOT >>> >>>> On 26 Nov 2016 6:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> What that man said >>>> >>>> Sent from my Windows 10 phone >>>> >>>> From: {

Re: [LU] Rotherham

an't please some people, two nil up away from home ffs. >> >> Believe! MOT >> >>> On 26 Nov 2016 6:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: >>> >>> What that man said >>> >>> Sent from my Windows 10 phone >>>

Re: [LU] Rotherham

t;>> On 26 Nov 2016 6:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> What that man said >>>> >>>> Sent from my Windows 10 phone >>>> >>>> From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit >>>> Sent: 26 Novembe

Re: [LU] Rotherham

:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> What that man said >>>> >>>> Sent from my Windows 10 phone >>>> >>>> From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit >>>> Sent: 26 November 2016 17:59

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Nov 2016 6:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> What that man said > > >> > > >> Sent from my Windows 10 phone > > >> > > >> From: {broken-ad

Re: [LU] Rotherham

from home ffs. > > > > Believe! MOT > > > >> On 26 Nov 2016 6:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: > >> > >> What that man said > >> > >> Sent from my Windows 10 phone > >> > >> From: {broken-address} Ni

Re: [LU] Rotherham

t;> On 26 Nov 2016 6:51 p.m., <errand.fivef...@talk21.com> wrote: >> >> What that man said >> >> Sent from my Windows 10 phone >> >> From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit >> Sent: 26 November 2016 17:59 >> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org >>

Re: [LU] Rotherham

What that man said Sent from my Windows 10 phone From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Sent: 26 November 2016 17:59 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Rotherham Are truly awful. We should be playing quicker and getting at them more. Sent from my iPhone

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Get a 3rd then take off anyone on 4 bookings. 1 Dec is final date for 5 bookings meaning suspension.   Original Message   From: {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:39 To: {broken-address} Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List; Paul Cundell Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham I

Re: [LU] Rotherham

; wrote: >>> >>> By God the list is a bunch is miserable g1ts sometimes!!! >>> >>> >>> Original Message >>> From: Paul Cundell >>> Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:28 >>> To: {broken-address} Richard Walker >>> Cc: Leeds List; {bro

Re: [LU] Rotherham

l.com> wrote: >> >> By God the list is a bunch is miserable g1ts sometimes!!! >> >> >> Original Message >> From: Paul Cundell >> Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:28 >> To: {broken-address} Richard Walker >> Cc: Leeds List; {broken-address}

Re: [LU] Rotherham

28 > To: {broken-address} Richard Walker > Cc: Leeds List; {broken-address} Nicholas Armit > Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham > > It is a good job they're sh*te, even when offside they can't hit the target > from inside the six yard box, but we go into half time 2 up and I know you > can on

Re: [LU] Rotherham

By God the list is a bunch is miserable g1ts sometimes!!!   Original Message   From: Paul Cundell Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:28 To: {broken-address} Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List; {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham It is a good job they're sh*te, even when

Re: [LU] Rotherham

It is a good job they're sh*te, even when offside they can't hit the target from inside the six yard box, but we go into half time 2 up and I know you can only beat what's in front of you but if we play like this on Tuesday it will be bloody embarrassing. Cheers Paul On 26 Nov 2016 18:18,

Re: [LU] Rotherham

To: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham They've been the best team since they went down to 10 men. Cooper done nowt wrong but we're not the same at the back without Jansson Philips and O'Kane weak in midfield. Woods despite his goal is static and has

Re: [LU] Rotherham

I spend half of these games screaming at Wood on the telly. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2016, at 1:17 PM, {broken-address} Richard Walker > wrote: > > They've been the best team since they went down to 10 men. Cooper done nowt > wrong but

Re: [LU] Rotherham

They've been the best team since they went down to 10 men. Cooper done nowt wrong but we're not the same at the back without Jansson Philips and O'Kane weak in midfield. Woods despite his goal is static and has the touch of a rapist. > On 26 Nov 2016, at 17:58, {broken-address} Nicholas Armit

Re: [LU] Rotherham

> Are truly awful. We should be playing quicker and getting at them more. they are down to 10 men and they've lost 2 players to injury already - I've got a really bad feeling about this... ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] Rotherham

Are truly awful. We should be playing quicker and getting at them more. Sent from my iPhone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

[LU] Rotherham

Well we are in the hat for the next round  and , ultimately, that is ALL that matters in the CupWe won 2 -0 and we probably deserved to win given that they had one shot on target and we had two ! Yes that is how poor a game it was.Evans made a few changes - as expected Coyle got a start at

[LU] Rotherham tickets

I know the mood on here was not exactly enthusiastic but for those of us who are going the prices are as follows£20 adults£10 concesssions£5 u16 I thought they were going to be £15 but not too bad I suppose in these times - L like the "twenty is plenty" idea (£5 more if pay on the gate as per

Re: [LU] Rotherham tickets

Perhaps then this might be a game when we don't concede the first goal for once! On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 1:42 AM, wrote: > Well I'm quite enthusiastic. I'm assuming we'll get enough points to pull > clear of relegation, but will remain well adrift of the top six, so we >

Re: [LU] Rotherham tickets

Well I'm quite enthusiastic. I'm assuming we'll get enough points to pull clear of relegation, but will remain well adrift of the top six, so we could do with a cup run for a bit of excitement. And as our official site still shows kick-off at 3pm on the Friday while Rotherham's says 3pm on

Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round

> Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:18:17 + (UTC) > From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> > To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round > I will be there but hardly one to get the juices flowingDave As we'r

Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round

te: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:18:17 + (UTC) >> From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> >> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> >> Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round > > >> I will be there but hardly one to get the juices flowingDave &

Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round

r 2015 15:13 > To: David Brennan > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round > > Couple of easy ties for me to get to 5th round then glorious defeat to a "big > name" > > As long as it doesn't derail league form and lead to relegation. > &g

Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round

One message to the list - pretty much reflects the amount of excitement this draw has imbued... > -Original Message- > From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] > On Behalf Of leedslist-requ...@gn.apc.org > Sent: 08 December 2015 12:00 > To:

Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round

t;leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2015, 12:38 Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round One message to the list - pretty much reflects the amount of excitement this draw has imbued... > -Original Message- > From:

Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round

her have had the 3 > points when we played them. > It's best not to think about it for too long :-( > From: David Brennan <d.r.bren...@leeds.ac.uk> > To: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2015, 12:38 > Subject: Re

Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round

y, 8 December 2015, 13:57 Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham in 3rd round The last Rotherham game nearly finished me off. Sent from my iPhone > On 8 Dec 2015, at 13:19, John Lee <bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > I looked this morning and felt pretty under-whelmed I must admit -

[LU] Rotherham in 3rd round.

ttfn Richard ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER

[LU] Rotherham report

Well bang goes all the optimism and euphoria of the last couple of weeks, as we came crashing down with a defeat to the bottom club. Redfearn, as he often did last year in saving our season, came , saw and sneaked out with the points in a game they did not deserve to win. One chance , one goal

Re: [LU] Rotherham - 'lap of honour'

Phil Absolutely outstanding!! Made my day. Cheers A On 3 May 2015 at 21:29, Conker phillshie...@hotmail.com wrote: The supporters should have done the lap of honour and got applauded by the players. --- Original Message --- Alec McQueen 0418 328967

Re: [LU] Rotherham - 'lap of honour'

The supporters should have done the lap of honour and got applauded by the players. --- Original Message --- From: nat...@sky.com Sent: 3 May 2015 12:21 To: Leeds List leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Rotherham - 'lap of honour' Did anyone stay for the 'lap of honour' or whatever they called