[LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread nat...@sky.com
Cellino does not seem to be the answer BUT if he does not take over the club it does look as if another spell in administration is beckoning ? We appear to be losing money hand over fist and our debts are growing massively

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread Paul Cundell
I don't want to get into the rights and wrongs of Cellino like I did Bates, plenty slated me over my opinion of Bates and I'd prefer not to get embroiled in a similar argument again. However, lets not confuse the need for a takeover/cash injection with GFH's apparent desire to sell to Cellino.

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread John Boocock
On 06/02/14 18:03, Paul Cundell wrote: they had to sell to someone but that someone didn't have to be Bates. succinct and to the point Paul! ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread tim . whelan
, but it may yet stay out of administration even without Cellino. Tim W. From: Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com To: David Nattan nat...@sky.com Cc: Leeds List leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2014, 18:03 Subject: Re: [LU] Sounds like we

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread Richard Walker
nat...@sky.com Cc: Leeds List leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2014, 18:03 Subject: Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble I don't want to get into the rights and wrongs of Cellino like I did Bates, plenty slated me over my opinion of Bates and I'd prefer not to get

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread Nicholas Armit
6, 2014 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble I don't want to get into the rights and wrongs of Cellino like I did Bates, plenty slated me over my opinion of Bates and I'd prefer not to get embroiled in a similar argument again. However,  lets not confuse the need

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread Paul Cundell
On 6 Feb 2014 18:22, tim.whe...@talk21.com wrote: And if Cellino should be deemed to fail the Football League's 'Fit and Proper Persons' test, then presumably GFH would then have to sell for whatever someone else was perpared to offer. They would get less than the £25 million that Cellino is

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread Rick Duniec
- Original Message - If it's because of perceived largesse, promised or inferred, in the near future I'd love to introduce them to the Kransortium who were similarly swayed only to be left high and dry when the clubs saviour plunged us into administration. My understanding is that they

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread David Woolmer
I don't think GFH give a flying proverbial about Cellino's largesse or otherwise once they've sold Leeds, just as Krasner didn't care about Bates. They are very similar sales processes - a seller who has run out of cash streams but with apparently imminent bills, who will take any offer at that

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread Paul Cundell
Promised largesse is allegedly why the Kransortium chose to sell to Bates rather than the other potential purchaser, who was sat waiting to exchange contracts in a solicitors office in Leeds whilst Bates effectively gazumped him. I reckon that if Cellino also offered individual sweeteners to the

Re: [LU] Sounds like we are in BIG trouble

2014-02-06 Thread Ian Murray
Exactly. Fear is a strong tool in propaganda and they are allowing this stuff to be released to scare the fans. I'm not too concerned - as you say there are other buyers. I'd take admin over these jokers or Cellino to be honest. Sent from my iPhone On 7 Feb 2014, at 2:04, Paul Cundell