[LU] We Beat The Scum Party
Perhaps you have to be as churlish as me to laugh at this... http://twitpic.com/4u06gy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hr7y_1jWBo ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Re: [LU] FA verdict in case of QPR's Alejandro Faurlin delayed
A fine is of no consequence if they still get promoted to PL!! -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt Anderson Sent: 05 May 2011 21:02 To: 'Nicholas Armit'; 'Jeremy Adams'; 'Leeds List' Subject: Re: [LU] FA verdict in case of QPR's Alejandro Faurlin delayed Just dock them 23 points or nothing! A fine is of little consequence to them when they are owned by several wealthy men ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Re: [LU] FA verdict in case of QPR's Alejandro Faurlin delayed
I only care about us! Makes no difference to me if they go up or not. Unless it benefits our cause then they have been best team and to be honest would rather see them go up than cardiff or forest --Original Message-- From: Mark Humphries To: 'Matt Anderson' To: 'Nicholas Armit' To: 'Jeremy Adams' To: 'Leeds List' Subject: RE: [LU] FA verdict in case of QPR's Alejandro Faurlin delayed Sent: 6 May 2011 10:23 A fine is of no consequence if they still get promoted to PL!! -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt Anderson Sent: 05 May 2011 21:02 To: 'Nicholas Armit'; 'Jeremy Adams'; 'Leeds List' Subject: Re: [LU] FA verdict in case of QPR's Alejandro Faurlin delayed Just dock them 23 points or nothing! A fine is of little consequence to them when they are owned by several wealthy men Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
[LU] NonLU: Peter Ridsdale in court over Cardiff City Golden Ticket offer
Naughty Peter, honest as ever. FORMER Cardiff City chairman Peter Ridsdale has appeared in court charged over last season's Golden Ticket scheme. Mr Ridsdale faces two charges under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and one under the Fraud Act 2006. The criminal charges have been brought against Mr Ridsdale, who stood down as Cardiff City chairman in May 2010, by Cardiff council's Trading Standards department. The Golden Ticket scheme was announced in December 2009, offering Bluebirds fans who buy season tickets early a full refund in the event of promotion to the Premier League. The club also promised to spend the proceeds on players in the January 2010 transfer window. On January 27, 2010, a statement was published on Cardiff City's website saying no new players would be bought. (http://www.walesonline.co.uk/footballnation/football-news/2011/05/06/peter- ridsdale-in-court-over-cardiff-city-golden-ticket-offer-91466-28641894/#ixzz 1La3qzjsJ) Nigel ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
[LU] Pointless team speculation for tomoprrow.
We need goals and lots of themso maybe Grayson will start with 4 strikers! (Which reminds me.I haven'Ät seen any comments on the fact that Somma was not, unless I am very much mistaken, even on the bench on Sat.) Anyway, back to QPRobviously, we are hardly going to get 3 pts and a big GD swing if we go a couple of goals down early on. The ground will be rocking, and Rangers will be totally up for it, so I am sure Grayson will realise that we've got to shut the fuckers up first off. So he won't go gung-ho from the start; but will he dare stick with the relatively successful 442 from last week, or revert to 451? First thing..McCartney has to go. He could bring Connolly back in and move Eric over to LB, or be very bold and play BJ at LB. That may allow him to either play Somma and move McCormack (who has to play) back into MF OR maybe even throw Livermore in. Can't see that happening though. So my bet is Connolly in for Lichaj and otherwise same as last week. With gollops of strikers on the bench ready to be thrown on at halftime once the chavs have all calmed down and the time is right for the big push! ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Re: [LU] Pointless team speculation for tomoprrow.
Somma was ill , that's why he wasnt in the team. I think if he had been well Grayson may have gone with him. McCormack. Hopefully he will tomorrow. Sent from my iPhone On 6 May 2011, at 21:34, Robert Heath rhe...@mis-munich.de wrote: We need goals and lots of themso maybe Grayson will start with 4 strikers! (Which reminds me.I haven'Ät seen any comments on the fact that Somma was not, unless I am very much mistaken, even on the bench on Sat.) Anyway, back to QPRobviously, we are hardly going to get 3 pts and a big GD swing if we go a couple of goals down early on. The ground will be rocking, and Rangers will be totally up for it, so I am sure Grayson will realise that we've got to shut the fuckers up first off. So he won't go gung-ho from the start; but will he dare stick with the relatively successful 442 from last week, or revert to 451? First thing..McCartney has to go. He could bring Connolly back in and move Eric over to LB, or be very bold and play BJ at LB. That may allow him to either play Somma and move McCormack (who has to play) back into MF OR maybe even throw Livermore in. Can't see that happening though. So my bet is Connolly in for Lichaj and otherwise same as last week. With gollops of strikers on the bench ready to be thrown on at halftime once the chavs have all calmed down and the time is right for the big push! ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Re: [LU] Pointless team speculation for tomoprrow.
Rich Would you recommend that they operate on Becchio? If so what procedure? Michael Dr Michael Benjamin, Community Psychiatrist --- myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT http://www.myRay.com -- Mental Health: http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com Auditing || Quality Control http://www.MyDoctorExplains.com/alamo/ Blog: http://www.DrMichaelBenjamin.com On 6 May 2011 23:31, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Somma was ill , that's why he wasnt in the team. I think if he had been well Grayson may have gone with him. McCormack. Hopefully he will tomorrow. Sent from my iPhone On 6 May 2011, at 21:34, Robert Heath rhe...@mis-munich.de wrote: We need goals and lots of themso maybe Grayson will start with 4 strikers! (Which reminds me.I haven'Ät seen any comments on the fact that Somma was not, unless I am very much mistaken, even on the bench on Sat.) Anyway, back to QPRobviously, we are hardly going to get 3 pts and a big GD swing if we go a couple of goals down early on. The ground will be rocking, and Rangers will be totally up for it, so I am sure Grayson will realise that we've got to shut the fuckers up first off. So he won't go gung-ho from the start; but will he dare stick with the relatively successful 442 from last week, or revert to 451? First thing..McCartney has to go. He could bring Connolly back in and move Eric over to LB, or be very bold and play BJ at LB. That may allow him to either play Somma and move McCormack (who has to play) back into MF OR maybe even throw Livermore in. Can't see that happening though. So my bet is Connolly in for Lichaj and otherwise same as last week. With gollops of strikers on the bench ready to be thrown on at halftime once the chavs have all calmed down and the time is right for the big push! ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
As I said, invest[ment] into productive enterprise - if you are a baker, you probably won't be able to manually make bread anymore (in economically significant quantities) once your in your 70s - if though you invest in a bread making machine with some of your surplus during your productive years then the bread continues to be made after you are in your dotage, so you can continue to eat even though you are no longer directly productive. British and American business preferred to spend the surplus that should have been set aside for pension investment on excess profits (mostly dividends to their shareholders) rather than on productive investment. Like I said I have a great deal of respect for actuarial science, and I don't think there are any surprises in life expectancy today that weren't forseen (and factored into pension calculations) 25/ 30 years ago. The big surprise for companies and therir pensioners is that we don't live in a perpetual bull-market - but then again when you look at the share of profits in our GDP I think that the companies knew that from the beginning! Damian PS - Class traitor! Wages slaves do what the're told. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Richard Naef rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk wrote: Final Salary pensions are perfectly sustainable if they are properly funded, and if the funding is invested into productive enterprise (for want of a better word). I have to say I couldn't agree less. Contributions make up a small part of the final pot., it is the predictions of growth, the poor investment polices, enormous profits and income of the people who manage them and increase in life expectancy that have caused the major part of the problem. Work for say 20 years at a company, retire at 65 (or earlier) and live for 20 years or more on the salary you finish on, do the mathematics old chap. I have been a private consumer of financial products for over 30 years now and have seen enough projections and graphs to fill the devils punch bowl, yet still need to work. Its bad enough in the public sector - which I pay for, but also private companies have had to top them up, taking money out of profits, again which I pay for. ttfn Richard ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
According to http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-111.pdf life expectancy for a UK male has gone from about 70 to about 75 in between 1981 2011 - say 7,5% increase, I can't find the exact figures at the moment but productivity per worker over the same period has increased by much much more. If we could afford final salary pensions in 1981 (and we could) why can't we today? (clue - the answer is in my preceeding mails ;)) Damian PS I know there are other factors such as migration and often a shorter working life in white collar jobs, but the point is the same On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Damian Walsh pussaydam...@gmail.com wrote: As I said, invest[ment] into productive enterprise - if you are a baker, you probably won't be able to manually make bread anymore (in economically significant quantities) once your in your 70s - if though you invest in a bread making machine with some of your surplus during your productive years then the bread continues to be made after you are in your dotage, so you can continue to eat even though you are no longer directly productive. British and American business preferred to spend the surplus that should have been set aside for pension investment on excess profits (mostly dividends to their shareholders) rather than on productive investment. Like I said I have a great deal of respect for actuarial science, and I don't think there are any surprises in life expectancy today that weren't forseen (and factored into pension calculations) 25/ 30 years ago. The big surprise for companies and therir pensioners is that we don't live in a perpetual bull-market - but then again when you look at the share of profits in our GDP I think that the companies knew that from the beginning! Damian PS - Class traitor! Wages slaves do what the're told. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Richard Naef rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk wrote: Final Salary pensions are perfectly sustainable if they are properly funded, and if the funding is invested into productive enterprise (for want of a better word). I have to say I couldn't agree less. Contributions make up a small part of the final pot., it is the predictions of growth, the poor investment polices, enormous profits and income of the people who manage them and increase in life expectancy that have caused the major part of the problem. Work for say 20 years at a company, retire at 65 (or earlier) and live for 20 years or more on the salary you finish on, do the mathematics old chap. I have been a private consumer of financial products for over 30 years now and have seen enough projections and graphs to fill the devils punch bowl, yet still need to work. Its bad enough in the public sector - which I pay for, but also private companies have had to top them up, taking money out of profits, again which I pay for. ttfn Richard ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Re: [LU] Pointless team speculation for tomoprrow.
We've blown it. We were top six all Fcking year n all. Scored more goals than anyone, we just can't defend. Sent from my iPhone On 6 May 2011, at 22:29, Dr Michael Benjamin m...@myray.com wrote: Rich Would you recommend that they operate on Becchio? If so what procedure? Michael Dr Michael Benjamin, Community Psychiatrist --- myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT http://www.myRay.com -- Mental Health: http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com Auditing || Quality Control http://www.MyDoctorExplains.com/alamo/ Blog: http://www.DrMichaelBenjamin.com On 6 May 2011 23:31, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Somma was ill , that's why he wasnt in the team. I think if he had been well Grayson may have gone with him. McCormack. Hopefully he will tomorrow. Sent from my iPhone On 6 May 2011, at 21:34, Robert Heath rhe...@mis-munich.de wrote: We need goals and lots of themso maybe Grayson will start with 4 strikers! (Which reminds me.I haven'Ät seen any comments on the fact that Somma was not, unless I am very much mistaken, even on the bench on Sat.) Anyway, back to QPRobviously, we are hardly going to get 3 pts and a big GD swing if we go a couple of goals down early on. The ground will be rocking, and Rangers will be totally up for it, so I am sure Grayson will realise that we've got to shut the fuckers up first off. So he won't go gung-ho from the start; but will he dare stick with the relatively successful 442 from last week, or revert to 451? First thing..McCartney has to go. He could bring Connolly back in and move Eric over to LB, or be very bold and play BJ at LB. That may allow him to either play Somma and move McCormack (who has to play) back into MF OR maybe even throw Livermore in. Can't see that happening though. So my bet is Connolly in for Lichaj and otherwise same as last week. With gollops of strikers on the bench ready to be thrown on at halftime once the chavs have all calmed down and the time is right for the big push! ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
