Nope. Freedom of expression is important. Look at all that Giggs nonsense -
would not have been possible with constitutional protection for the media.
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Jul 2011, at 05:25, Dr Michael Benjamin m...@myray.com wrote:
You're joking!!
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community
Shoot the lawyers.
Anything but a constitution that the wankers can take control and waste time.
Not to mention the lunacy of US law.
They are not Lawyers involved in observing the law. They are de facto making
the law and subverting it.
In a democracy there is one lawmaker. Get elected and
dont know much about B-G to be honest. Most politicians should meet a
guillotine IMHO :-)
The guillotine was invented to make executions more human for all.
Depending on how low or high you were on the social scale a death warrant
was executed
in different manners. The most horrific ones were
On 04/07/2011 09:28, Ian Murray wrote:
Nope. Freedom of expression is important. Look at all that Giggs nonsense -
would not have been possible with constitutional protection for the media.
Well, to be fair, depends on the constitution. Ours is... Article 10 of
the Human Rights Act 1988:
Totally - but they're talking about repealing it. We definitely need a written
constitution, in one document, binding on Parliament IMHO.
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Jul 2011, at 21:36, Simon Austin simon...@auzsoft.net wrote:
On 04/07/2011 09:28, Ian Murray wrote:
Nope. Freedom of expression is
