Shoot the lawyers. Anything but a constitution that the wankers can take control and waste time. Not to mention the lunacy of US law. They are not Lawyers involved in observing the law. They are de facto making the law and subverting it. In a democracy there is one lawmaker. Get elected and don't hijack. End of another rant. Thank you I feel much calmer.
Sent from my iPhone D"r Michael Benjamin Community Psychiatry On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:28, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope. Freedom of expression is important. Look at all that Giggs nonsense - > would not have been possible with constitutional protection for the media. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 4 Jul 2011, at 05:25, Dr Michael Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You're joking!! >> Dr Michael Benjamin, >> Community Psychiatrist >> ------------------------------- >> myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT >> http://www.myRay.com >> ------------------------------ >> Mental Health: >> http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com >> -------------------------------- >> Auditing || Quality Control >> http://www.MyDoctorExplains.com/alamo/ >> -------------------------------- >> Blog: >> http://www.DrMichaelBenjamin.com >> >> >> >> On 4 July 2011 00:31, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote: >> Completely agree. We need constitutional protection like the United States. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 3 Jul 2011, at 21:57, Damian Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > No apologies for the non LU content - (there's bugger all to talk about >> > anyway at the moment) >> > >> > I see she that someone has just got a police caution for making online >> > remarks about Simon Cowell's organisation and the "talent" that he finds. >> > >> > There's lots of things to say about both the "loser TV" that makes Simon >> > Cowell and others very rich, but I'm posting more about the free-speech >> > aspect of this. I think that there are very tough libel and slander laws in >> > the UK, so much so that people come from all over the world to sue because >> > the playing field isn't entirely level. So why does Simon Cowell need a >> > new(ish) criminal act to protect his reputation? Why do governments pander >> > to these people. Pander? Pander! is anyone suggesting that in a different >> > context a Simon Cowell would have a criminal record himself? >> > >> > This is wrong. >> > >> > Damian >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Leedslist mailing list >> > Info and options: >> > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> > >> > MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) >> >> _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
