Re: [LU] Team v Spit Junior’s lot

Got that one a bit wrong didn’t I. A good performance without needing some of the big hitters. I think Bamford has played his way into the starting XI for a little while. Still a bit worried about the full backs. Most have had 1 or 2 tough games recently, with the exception of Byram, who seems q

Re: [LU] Team v Spit Junior’s lot

Yes, they were so terrible weren't they! Tim Greenwood timothy.greenw...@gmail.com On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 8:58 AM Kevin Lewis via Leedslist < leedslist@gn.apc.org> wrote: > Looks a weak team to me. The fact that Ayling is the only defender on the > bench must mean that Cresswell and Hjelde are

Re: [LU] Team news

Cooper out - picked up a knock. Raphina, Rodrigo and Philips on the bench. On Sat, 8 May 2021, 11:31 john, wrote: > From BBC sport..Leeds United pair Kalvin Phillips and Raphinha will be > assessed as they seek to recover from respective knee and thigh > problems.Captain Liam Cooper return

Re: [LU] Team of the week

Tad surprised by Harrison TBH. I thought he good a good game but not team of the week stuff. From: Leedslist on behalf of Guy Thornton Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 3:17 PM To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Team of the week Three Leeds players - Me

Re: [LU] Team for tomorrer- now tonight

Regarding tonight's team:- I can't see Ayling being left out, as that would make the team frighteningly short at the back. It will be tough on anyone, but I can see Dallas making way, and going back to 4-1-4-1. Ayling gives us a more defensive full-back, to make up for Costa's defensive side

Re: [LU] Team v Norwich

I think if he played Phillips he would be defensive mid and then Forshaw would have to move forward and Klich to 10 behind Roofe, this way he keeps Forshaw in front of defence with Klich slightly further forward and Roberts at 10 -  Forshaw & Klich helped destroy Derby and now Klich is back on t

Re: [LU] Team v Norwich

Yes I thought he'd drop Clarke but I expected Philips to play rather than Roberts. However, he's obviously seeing what I see most weeks in that Roofe is struggling on his own up front. We have a lot of possession but are not turning these into chances because of the lack of options up front. Ro

Re: [LU] team

jamin/e/B00ZTT5HUK/> Blogs:<https://www.jpost.com/Blogger/Michael-Benjamin> myRay Online Self Help <http://www.myray.org> From: Leedslist on behalf of Brendan Osborne Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 9:57:40 PM To: Leeds List; Richard Naef Subject: Re: [LU] te

Re: [LU] team

I just hope that spy stunt doesn't cost us a points deduction. Playing well and denied a definite penalty for an offside that wasn't. Get Outlook for Android From: Leedslist on behalf of Richard Naef Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 7:51:2

Re: [LU] Team v QPR.

: Re: [LU] Team v QPR. Except they won't (this isn't Sutton) so we won't. Nick On Friday, January 4, 2019, 1:37:18 PM EST, Richard Walker via Leedslist wrote: Looks like a really weak team to me. If QPR put their first XI out I would expect a spanking. > On 4 Jan 20

Re: [LU] Team v QPR.

January 2019 19:29 To: Matt Anderson Cc: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Team v QPR. Why is the team announced 2 days before the game? Is it on tv being Sunday? Sent from my iPhone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org

Re: [LU] Team v QPR.

Why is the team announced 2 days before the game? Is it on tv being Sunday? Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Jan 2019, at 19:02, Matt Anderson wrote: > > They won’t. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 4 Jan 2019, at 18:37, Richard Walker wrote: >> >> Looks like a really weak team to me. If QPR put

Re: [LU] Team v QPR.

Except they won't (this isn't Sutton) so we won't. Nick On Friday, January 4, 2019, 1:37:18 PM EST, Richard Walker via Leedslist wrote: Looks like a really weak team to me. If QPR put their first XI out I would expect a spanking. > On 4 Jan 2019, at 18:33, Matt Anderson wrote: > >

Re: [LU] Team v QPR.

They won’t. Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Jan 2019, at 18:37, Richard Walker wrote: > > Looks like a really weak team to me. If QPR put their first XI out I would > expect a spanking. > > >> On 4 Jan 2019, at 18:33, Matt Anderson wrote: >> >> Happy with that. Thought Alioski might get a rest

Re: [LU] Team v QPR.

Looks like a really weak team to me. If QPR put their first XI out I would expect a spanking. > On 4 Jan 2019, at 18:33, Matt Anderson wrote: > > Happy with that. Thought Alioski might get a rest > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 4 Jan 2019, at 14:48, Richard Naef >> wrote: >> >> BPF, Shac

Re: [LU] Team v QPR.

Happy with that. Thought Alioski might get a rest Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Jan 2019, at 14:48, Richard Naef wrote: > > BPF, Shackleton, Halme, Ayling, Davis, Forshaw, Baker, Roberts, Alioski, > Clarke & Harrison as centre forward. > > Actually v clisr to the team I thought about last night

Re: [LU] Team for today

i36> From: Leedslist on behalf of {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 5:51:13 PM To: {broken-address} Richard Walker Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today Poor, poor fucking poor - they are complete garbage but unfortunately we are just

Re: [LU] Team for today

Poor, poor fucking poor - they are complete garbage but unfortunately we are just as bad Hernandez having one of those days where he appears to be playing for the opposition as he keeps giving them the ball - young lad Pearce maki g his debut looks shit to me Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Mar 2

Re: [LU] Team for today

This is comically bad Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Mar 2018, at 14:17, Simon McNally wrote: > > 尊楪랧뙜鎢뢜虗鹶쮤즨梡쨮鄦귗댚꽭㗳帵ﻓ䴴䗫溮珚똙幹�請客竈❪霨긄幱秔輖隬뇚♪⧨縉�쨫臗겊৚뗫㟯涴흏㗟ꚬꗪ�盇ꝵ惆ꊔ蒆劽��ⰻ嵦㔯㪟滌퍞胏㙈䎊ఱ돀煢�车ᙲꕅ⻬鐷偟�畽赁ᾐ헐枖ጬጣ୅ꒊⶱ騘톑ဏ騣櫙Ẁᳶꗵ䬀톋닍䱊햝�奡꾆㼘恚�僣軝셟̏၀◪鞅❰檰㗬䢐盜瞽ⴉ廳萫୙琚⹳芷횒ᐼ⡋塸⒋鼛ᣆ燉붣̀睛ᇄ唽ꑷ隽퉓뉩㌈쩜΍ࡥ鄚們淄藼䇖䎥绪�쁡ⓐ兗䜬�堐欉牎ᱛ沔敔授脼鹤螬ឝ䱢ȋ작鎑�

Re: [LU] Team

yes a couple of good saves. I like his kicking - if anything it's too good at times  On Saturday, 10 March 2018, 15:50:20 GMT, Simon McNally wrote: Just equalised- sounds like BPF is keeping us in it  Sent from my iPhone On 10 Mar 2018, at 15:18, Richard Walker wrote: 1-0 down - J

Re: [LU] Team

1-1 and an interesting half between 2 poor teams who are both trying to play but both making schoolboy errors. We could be 3 or 4 down though. De Bock has made 2 bad errors and for the goal our backline just went to sleep. Up to 40 minutes we hadn't really done anything at the other end but we c

Re: [LU] Team

Just equalised- sounds like BPF is keeping us in it Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Mar 2018, at 15:18, Richard Walker wrote: > > 1-0 down - Jansson asleep for me. > > Barrow got the beating of Beradi every time. > > > > On Saturday, 10 March 2018, 14:57:09 GMT, Simon McNally > wrote: > >

Re: [LU] Team

1-0 down - Jansson asleep for me. Barrow got the beating of Beradi every time. On Saturday, 10 March 2018, 14:57:09 GMT, Simon McNally wrote: I think in that event I’d just play with ten men.I think the heck is using these games to have a look at potential pairings in midfield, thoug

Re: [LU] Team

I think in that event I’d just play with ten men. I think the heck is using these games to have a look at potential pairings in midfield, though how he could think O’Kane is a possibility I’m not sure. I’d be interested to see Anita in central midfield if that is supposed to be his best position.

Re: [LU] Team

Simon, you're right !  Vierra should start every time in front of O'Kane. Even if Vierra accidentally lost a limb in a freak gardening accident. On Saturday, 10 March 2018, 14:51:03 GMT, Simon McNally wrote: I’m struggling to think of a scenario in which O’Kane is a better option Sen

Re: [LU] Team

I’m struggling to think of a scenario in which O’Kane is a better option Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Mar 2018, at 14:31, {broken-address} > wrote: > > Has Vieira's form dropped so much that O'Kane is now a better option as a > ball-winning midfielder? That seems incredible to me. > > > Chee

Re: [LU] Team

For the players we have available I think that is about as close as it gets to be being the team I would want. Only issue for me is Lasogga. I just think he needs someone fast like Ekuban next to him to run the channels so he can play in the box. Nick On Saturday, March 10, 2018, 9:19:23 AM

Re: [LU] Team

To be honest, and I'm Vierra's biggest fan, he has lost all confidence and his performances this season have been poor. I don't think O'Kane's have been any better but I would not be tempted to put Vierra back in until the team start to improve.  On Saturday, 10 March 2018, 14:32:03 GMT, {b

Re: [LU] Team

Has Vieira's form dropped so much that O'Kane is now a better option as a ball-winning midfielder? That seems incredible to me. Cheers! Sean -Original Message- From: {broken-address} Richard Walker To: Leeds List Sent: Sat, Mar 10, 2018 9:19 am Subject: [LU] Team Very interestin

Re: [LU] Team

oh and nearly forgot - Dallas dropped. That relegation is truly deserved ! On Saturday, 10 March 2018, 14:19:17 GMT, {broken-address} Richard Walker wrote: Very interesting team selection.  Some of it makes sense some it doesn't. Lasogga dropped - can't argue with that because he doesn'

Re: [LU] Team selection

pc.org; {broken-address}; {broken-address} Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection Imagine playing in front of weidwald. You’d sodding brick it every match. He must have some dirt on the chairman. Only explanation. On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 at 20:38, {broken-address} Nicholas Armit mailto:arm...@yahoo.

Re: [LU] Team selection

r piece > > > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > > > > From: Leedslist on behalf of > {broken-address} > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:30:17 PM > > To: Simon McNally > > Cc: le

Re: [LU] Team selection

st on behalf of > > {broken-address} > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:30:17 PM > > To: Simon McNally > > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address} > > Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection > > > > One odd thing I thought I saw - when Derby wh

Re: [LU] Team selection

ken-address} Richard Walker >> wrote: >> >> I think Saiz and Vierra have to play. >> and Lonergan >> >> From: {broken-address} >> To: nat...@sky.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 16:46 >> Subject: Re: [LU]

Re: [LU] Team selection

ook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > From: Leedslist on behalf of {broken-address} > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:30:17 PM > To: Simon McNally > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address} > Subject: Re: [LU] Team

Re: [LU] Team selection

rd Walker ; "leedslist@gn.apc.org" ; {broken-address} Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 20:30 Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection One odd thing I thought I saw - when Derby whipped over that fast corner which went past everyone, I’m sure Wiedewald actually flinched and sort of pul

Re: [LU] Team selection

> and Lonergan >> >> From: {broken-address} >> To: nat...@sky.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 16:46 >> Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection >> >> Interesting prediction, Dave. >> >> >> There are pros

Re: [LU] Team selection

eedslist on behalf of {broken-address} > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:30:17 PM > To: Simon McNally > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address} > Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection > > One odd thing I thought I saw - when Derby whipped over that fast corner >

Re: [LU] Team selection

rgan >> >> From: {broken-address} >> To: nat...@sky.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 16:46 >> Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection >> >> Interesting prediction, Dave. >> >> >> There are pros and cons to mo

Re: [LU] Team selection

broken-address} > To: nat...@sky.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org > Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 16:46 > Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection > > Interesting prediction, Dave. > > > There are pros and cons to most of the options that Heck has. I would > probably opt for 4

Re: [LU] Team selection

I really hope he doesn’t play Wiedewald as after the inevitable mistake he’ll be slaughtered. I would keep Anita in - he’s solid enough, and whilst nothing special I never get the feeling he’s one tackle away from getting sent off! Much as Pennington has some rough edges, I really hope he play

Re: [LU] Team selection

I think Saiz and Vierra have to play.  and Lonergan  From: {broken-address} To: nat...@sky.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 16:46 Subject: Re: [LU] Team selection Interesting prediction, Dave. There are pros and cons to most of the options that Heck

Re: [LU] Team selection

Interesting prediction, Dave. There are pros and cons to most of the options that Heck has. I would probably opt for 4-4-2 with a back four of Berardi, Pontus, Cooper (for his maturity and leadership) and DeBock, a midfield of Vieira (O'Kane is too lightweight), Forshaw, Hernandez and Saiz, wi

Re: [LU] Team for today

t > To: Richard Walker > Cc: Richard Naef ; {broken-address} Richard > Walker ; "nat...@sky.com" > ; Leeds List > Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 14:05 > Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today > > Sacko Grot Cibicki Lasogga Anita Shaughnessy all really poor > >

Re: [LU] Team for today

I thought the only players to emerge with any credit from that shambles were Berardi and Cooper. -Original Message- From: {broken-address} Richard Walker To: Nicholas Armit Cc: Leeds List ; {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: Sun, Jan 7, 2018 9:20 am Subject: Re: [LU] Team for

Re: [LU] Team for today

what about Philips ? he's no way near good enough if we want to progress. From: Nicholas Armit To: Richard Walker Cc: Richard Naef ; {broken-address} Richard Walker ; "nat...@sky.com" ; Leeds List Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 14:05 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today

Re: [LU] Team for today

hard Walker > ; "nat...@sky.com" > > Cc: Leeds List > Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 13:29 > Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today > > Did we pay money for him? If so hope we kept the receipt. > > Sent from my Mobile > > Original Message

Re: [LU] Team for today

Well done Newport, they deserved it 100% Sent from my Mobile Original Message Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today From: Richard Walker To: Matt Anderson CC: Richard Naef ,{broken-address} Richard Walker ,nat...@sky.com,Leeds List agreed - but a replay looks favourite unless Siaz

Re: [LU] Team for today

; ; Leeds List Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 13:38 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today They deserve that equaliser and probably to win so far Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Jan 2018, at 13:31, {broken-address} Richard Walker > wrote: > > hes obviously going to score now ! > &

Re: [LU] Team for today

> ; "nat...@sky.com" > > Cc: Leeds List > Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 13:29 > Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today > > Did we pay money for him? If so hope we kept the receipt. > > Sent from my Mobile > > Original Message > Subject:

Re: [LU] Team for today

dress} Richard Walker ; "nat...@sky.com" Cc: Leeds List Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 13:31 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today hes obviously going to score now !        From: Richard Naef To: Richard Walker ; {broken-address} Richard Walker ; "nat...@sky.com" Cc: Lee

Re: [LU] Team for today

hes obviously going to score now !  From: Richard Naef To: Richard Walker ; {broken-address} Richard Walker ; "nat...@sky.com" Cc: Leeds List Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 13:29 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today Did we pay money for him? If so hope we kept the rece

Re: [LU] Team for today

Did we pay money for him? If so hope we kept the receipt. Sent from my Mobile Original Message Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today From: Richard Walker To: Richard Naef ,{broken-address} Richard Walker ,nat...@sky.com CC: Leeds List Sacko is absolutely rubbish

Re: [LU] Team for today

Sacko is absolutely rubbish. From: Richard Naef To: {broken-address} Richard Walker ; "nat...@sky.com" Cc: Leeds List Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 13:22 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today Embarrassing,. Sackho, Grot and lasogga, can all fuck off back from whence they

Re: [LU] Team for today

Embarrassing,. Sackho, Grot and lasogga, can all fuck off back from whence they came. If they can't perform against a league 2 side they're not worth their wages, if it wasn't for Berardi we'd be 2-0 down. Sent from my Mobile Original Message -------- Subject: Re:

Re: [LU] Team for today

Absolute shite first half. Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Jan 2018, at 11:38, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > > Lonergan, Borthwick-Jackson, Shaughnessy, Berardi, Anita, Phillips, Klich, > Cibicki, Sacko, Grot, LasoggaSubs: Peacock-Farrell, Cooper, Kitching, Pearce, > Rey, Saiz, Clarke > So lots of cha

Re: [LU] Team for today

Found a center back in Berardi but Grot and Lasogga...oh dear. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 7, 2018, at 6:38 AM, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > > Lonergan, Borthwick-Jackson, Shaughnessy, Berardi, Anita, Phillips, Klich, > Cibicki, Sacko, Grot, LasoggaSubs: Peacock-Farrell, Cooper, Kitching, Pearce

Re: [LU] Team for today

t;> >> >> From: Matt Anderson >> To: "nat...@sky.com" >> Cc: Leeds List >> Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 11:48 >> Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today >> >> Apparently it’s on BBC wales live >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> &g

Re: [LU] Team for today

Tvcatchup.com has a bbc wales option for us foreigners Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 7, 2018, at 6:53 AM, Ted wrote: > > I really don't get this modern day obsession of managers playing 2nd string > teams - maybe if you're a top 5 Prem team you might have a brilliant squad. > > I never forgave

Re: [LU] Team for today

Or 952 in HD ;-) Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Jan 2018, at 11:49, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > > Yeah - on sky ch978- on now > Dave > > > From: Matt Anderson > To: "nat...@sky.com" > Cc: Leeds List > Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 11:48 >

Re: [LU] Team for today

I really don't get this modern day obsession of managers playing 2nd string teams - maybe if you're a top 5 Prem team you might have a brilliant squad. I never forgave Monk for what he did last year, hope TC has judged this right. I'm sure fans (especially those who spend their hard-earned cash g

Re: [LU] Team for today

Yeah - on sky ch978- on now Dave From: Matt Anderson To: "nat...@sky.com" Cc: Leeds List Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2018, 11:48 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for today Apparently it’s on BBC wales live Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Jan 2018, at 11:38, "nat.

Re: [LU] Team for today

Apparently it’s on BBC wales live Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Jan 2018, at 11:38, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > > Lonergan, Borthwick-Jackson, Shaughnessy, Berardi, Anita, Phillips, Klich, > Cibicki, Sacko, Grot, LasoggaSubs: Peacock-Farrell, Cooper, Kitching, Pearce, > Rey, Saiz, Clarke > So lot

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

y.com" To: David W ; Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 16:32 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum All true and 0 0 is not a bad result coupled with the previous 4 results  BUT we just want some more from our team From: David W To: Richard Wal

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

All true and 0 0 is not a bad result coupled with the previous 4 results  BUT we just want some more from our team From: David W To: Richard Walker Cc: "nat...@sky.com" ; Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 16:09 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum Personal

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

gt; To: "nat...@sky.com" ; Leeds List > Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 15:15 > Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum > > midfield getting overrun - Shaughnessy not at the races as expected. > a lot on Pablo this afternoon. > > From: "nat...@sky.com&quo

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

ff. From: {broken-address} Richard Walker To: "nat...@sky.com" ; Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 15:15 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum midfield getting overrun - Shaughnessy not at the races as expected.  a lot on Pablo this afternoon.        From: "na

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

midfield getting overrun - Shaughnessy not at the races as expected.  a lot on Pablo this afternoon.  From: "nat...@sky.com" To: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 14:47 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum Very odd choice to put Shaughnassey in ahead of Anita and K

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

y, 30 December 2017, 14:37 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum yes I thought they were the better team at ER       From: Simon McNally To: Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 14:36 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum   Brum are a strange one. They’ve got some players

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

14:37 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum yes I thought they were the better team at ER       From: Simon McNally To: Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 14:36 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum   Brum are a strange one. They’ve got some players that look decent for

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

yes I thought they were the better team at ER From: Simon McNally To: Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 14:36 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum Brum are a strange one. They’ve got some players that look decent for this level and I thought they caused

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

; Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 14:24 > Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum > > TC really doesn’t rate Klich. He was poor at Cardiff but must be more to it > that that - poor attitude in training? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 30 Dec 2017, at 14:16, {broken-address} Richa

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

yep that's fair enough. Worried about a midfield containing Philips and Shaughnessy. I hope Brum are really poor.  From: Simon McNally To: Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 30 December 2017, 14:24 Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Brum TC really doesn’t rate Klich. H

Re: [LU] Team for Brum

TC really doesn’t rate Klich. He was poor at Cardiff but must be more to it that that - poor attitude in training? Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Dec 2017, at 14:16, {broken-address} Richard Walker > wrote: > > Shaughnessy in midfield with Siaz on the bench. > Brave decision. > Kiltch's future

Re: [LU] Team

Villa looking like a big game on Friday night.        From: Richard Walker To: Richard Walker ; Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 25 November 2017, 13:26 Subject: Re: [LU] Team   well that was better than your usual 45 mins at Oakwell.  Been impressed with Saiz, Ekuban and Allioski  Disappointed with

Re: [LU] Team

le with a win here but I think apart from key players there was a lot at fault with this performance.  Villa looking like a big game on Friday night.  From: Richard Walker To: Richard Walker ; Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 25 November 2017, 13:26 Subject: Re: [LU] Team well that was bet

Re: [LU] Team

And big empty spaces in the stands. Surprising? On Saturday, November 25, 2017, 8:27:07 AM EST, {broken-address} Richard Walker wrote: well that was better than your usual 45 mins at Oakwell.  Been impressed with Saiz, Ekuban and Allioski  Disappointed with O'Kane and Hernandez. As usua

Re: [LU] Team

well that was better than your usual 45 mins at Oakwell.  Been impressed with Saiz, Ekuban and Allioski  Disappointed with O'Kane and Hernandez. As usual Hernandez has had loads of the ball but has given it away on just about every occasion. O'kane also has given the ball away in key areas and in

Re: [LU] Team List yet?

O'Kane dropped - that's a good decision.  From: {broken-address} Richard Walker To: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit ; Peter Castlehouse Cc: leedslist Sent: Sunday, 19 November 2017, 12:58 Subject: Re: [LU] Team List yet? Roofe on his own up front !??  I suppose if

Re: [LU] Team List yet?

Roofe on his own up front !??  I suppose if Lasogga is injured he doesn't have too many options  From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit To: Peter Castlehouse Cc: leedslist Sent: Sunday, 19 November 2017, 12:29 Subject: Re: [LU] Team List yet? Leeds United Team vs Middlesb

Re: [LU] Team List yet?

Leeds United Team vs Middlesbrough Lonergan, Ayling, Cooper, Jansson, Berardi, Vieira, Phillips, Saiz, Hernandez, Alioski, Roofe Substitutes: Wiedwald, Pennington, Anita, O'Kane, Sacko, Ekuban, Grot Lasogga ill, Dallas? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 19, 2017, at 2:54 AM, Peter Castlehouse wro

Re: [LU] Team List yet?

That makes it 915 in Perth. Nice... On 19 Nov. 2017 15:54, "Peter Castlehouse" wrote: > Just want to know if it's worth a 12.15am - 2am stay up to watch. > > > > Pete C > > ___ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mai

Re: [LU] Team today- 3 pts please lads

At what point does someone conclude that this isn’t working in any way, shape or form? OK, Lonergan dropped a clanger, but that free kick went straight through a defensive wall with no-one in a position to affect its’ flight. These really are schoolboy errors. Unless we have some form of epiph

Re: [LU] Team today- 3 pts please lads

Brentford look like Barcelona compared to us and we need a couple of new keepers in January. Glad I’m going out in a minute Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Nov 2017, at 17:40, Vijay Bhakta wrote: > > 2 mins in and quite painful to watch. I need more beer I think > > On 4 November 2017 at 17:3

Re: [LU] Team today- 3 pts please lads

2 mins in and quite painful to watch. I need more beer I think On 4 November 2017 at 17:33, {broken-address} < bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> wrote: > I still can’t understand why Saiz is out on the wing, for the first half > at least, unless he has some sort of roaming role? We’

Re: [LU] Team today- 3 pts please lads

I still can’t understand why Saiz is out on the wing, for the first half at least, unless he has some sort of roaming role? We’ll see! Sent from my iPad > On 4 Nov 2017, at 17:08, Michael Benjamin wrote: > > On TV > I am a jinx-- sorry, lads another abomination ahead. ☹ > > > > -Origin

Re: [LU] Team today- 3 pts please lads

On TV I am a jinx-- sorry, lads another abomination ahead. ☹ -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of nat...@sky.com Sent: 04 November 2017 19:01 To: Leeds List Subject: [LU] Team today- 3 pts please lads : Lonergan, Ayling, Cooper, Janss

Re: [LU] Team v Leicester

Of Richard > Naef > Sent: 22 October 2017 22:29 > To: Shane Larkin ; Graham White > > Cc: Leeds List > Subject: Re: [LU] Team v Leicester > > They just need to get a room and get rid of all that sexual tension.. > > Sent from my Mobile > > ---

Re: [LU] Team v Leicester

Ever heard of Projective Identification? -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard Naef Sent: 22 October 2017 22:29 To: Shane Larkin ; Graham White Cc: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Team v Leicester They just need to get a room and

Re: [LU] Team v Leicester

They just need to get a room and get rid of all that sexual tension.. Sent from my Mobile Original Message Subject: Re: [LU] Team v Leicester From: Shane Larkin To: Graham White CC: Leeds List It's their nature :) On 22 Oct 2017 6:33 p.m., "{broken-address} Gr

Re: [LU] Team v Leicester

It's their nature :) On 22 Oct 2017 6:33 p.m., "{broken-address} Graham White" < gcwhite2...@yahoo.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> wrote: > They just can't stop themselves, can they? > > It's like a compulsion! > > Graham WhiteOn Sunday, 22 October 2017, 17:52:26 CEST, Michael > Benjamin wrote: >

Re: [LU] Team v Leicester

They just can't stop themselves, can they? It's like a compulsion! Graham WhiteOn Sunday, 22 October 2017, 17:52:26 CEST, Michael Benjamin wrote: I bet you loved Billy Bunter. You don't seem to have got past him mentally Dr. Michael Benjamin From: Lee

Re: [LU] Team v Leicester

I bet you loved Billy Bunter. You don't seem to have got past him mentally Dr. Michael Benjamin From: Leedslist on behalf of Rob Heath Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 6:17:28 PM To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Team v Leicester Fullbacks bit of an issue,

Re: [LU] Team news - a few changes

k > like Warnock. > > Dr. Michael Benjamin > > > From: Leedslist on behalf of {broken-address} > Nicholas Armit > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:55:49 PM > To: Leeds List; nat...@sky.com > Subject: Re: [LU] Team news - a few changes

Re: [LU] Team news - a few changes

List; nat...@sky.com Subject: Re: [LU] Team news - a few changes Wow...No Saiz and Lasogga that is a shock (and a mistake?). Big shame about O'Kane. Still not convinced about Phillips especially in a game like this. Not confident with that team. Here's hoping. Would be pleased with a 0-0

Re: [LU] Team news - a few changes

Indeed, relying on Burnley-type sub impacts. Plus also feels like he is picking with an eye to the fact there's 2 big away games in 5 days. Maybe alternate Hernandez and Saiz for those games. Sent from my iPhone > On 26. Sep 2017, at 19:54, {broken-address} Richard Walker > wrote: > > No S

Re: [LU] Team news - a few changes

Wow...No Saiz and Lasogga that is a shock (and a mistake?). Big shame about O'Kane. Still not convinced about Phillips especially in a game like this.  Not confident with that team. Here's hoping. Would be pleased with a 0-0 tbh. Nick On Tuesday, September 26, 2017, 1:51:48 PM EDT, nat...@sky

Re: [LU] Team news - a few changes

No Siaz ... strange decision. I think this team has definitely been picked with the thought that the subs bench will come into play second half  On Tuesday, 26 September 2017, 18:51:25 BST, nat...@sky.com wrote: Anita rested - O'Kane ill. Saiz and Lasogga on benchFelix, Ayling Coops Po

Re: [LU] Team for Saturday

Lasogga starts Alioski on bench ttfn Richard -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard Naef Sent: 07 September 2017 20:56 To: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Team for Saturday I don't know how much Lasogga has played recently so I

Re: [LU] Team for Saturday

I don't know how much Lasogga has played recently so I doubt he'll start, but might get a seat on the bench for a late appearance. TC doesn't look like a risk taker so I think he'll pretty much tick with the Forest team. But for the first time in memory (about 30 minutes in my case) we have r

  1   2   3   4   >