On 2010/02/02 04:26, Carl Cox wrote:
I ran into another problem. I had a Cassius, nFS has Casey and Cassin, but
nFS/legacy 7.4 would not find them. I again brought up Cassius and selected
'possible match' and 'possible duplicate'. One of the choices let me do an
advanced search and I put in
Syble,
I too feel a little cheated with all the build up to the new update
but 'don't throw the baby out with the bathwater'. Legacy is still the
best family history program I have ever used in my 15 years of doing
it.
Ron,
I did update the software as soon as it became available, loaded the
nFS
Norman,
There are two aspects to this update: 1) Direct acces for LDS members to
Register ( or whatever it's called) Lds data, and 2) Direct access to the
new FS search. The former is working, but at present FS does not allow
direct access to its new data.
I am sure that you would not wish to
It fixed a backup issue that I had. And of course it is very useful for
LDS Legacy users. Our turn will come. I, for one, am not complaining.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
When I looked in my MRIN list I had a few Unknown Unknown entries.
However there were other individuals in my database, such as those at
the 'top' of each limb where both their parents were also unknown but
these were not listed.
Removing an Unknown Unknown from the MRIN listing mucks up the
Lionel,
There are various ways of creating these relationships, perhaps the most
common is where a child has been wrongly linked to parents, then linked to
the correct parents and the original parents deleted.
It is pretty much a waste of time trying to retain all your MRIN so that you
have an
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:58:31 +, Lionel Carter
lionelcar...@freezone.co.uk wrote:
Although I have switched duplex off in my printer setup screens (within
Legacy) printing is still in duplex.
Try closing Legacy. Then turn duplex printing off. Then start Legacy.
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
I have to agree with Ruth's frustration here, although I'm not quite
ready to leave the program just yet.
Back in August I reported a number of bugs in the formatting of GEDCOM
files exported from Legacy. Not a single one was fixed in the
September update, which I was okay with because it came
Many thanks. That worked.
Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:58:31 +, Lionel Carter
lionelcar...@freezone.co.uk wrote:
Although I have switched duplex off in my printer setup screens (within
Legacy) printing is still in duplex.
Try closing Legacy. Then turn duplex
Sherry,
I use the master file/Intellishare scheme. Until all collaborators shift to
Legacy 7, there must be Legacy 6 masters, else I can't return usable copies. I
keep separate files for many branches, for good reasons, but also common
working files and database, about 5 GB. It's not real
This is what I read on the web page. I left it for a few days. On reading it
while awake, I notice that 7.0 is not in the list. Oops.
This download will overwrite earlier versions with Legacy 7.4 Standard
Edition. If you are using the Deluxe Edition of Legacy 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 or 6.0,
you will need
Fixed Items:
LDS Screen - Fixed an error 5 problem.
Descendant Book Reports - Fixed a problem where duplicate lines were referring
the reader to the wrong page number.
Descendant Book Reports - The Show line back to starting ancestor option was
not printing for reports where source footnotes
I agree. There are many bugs that we have discussed here that have been
around for a long time -- some trivial and some not. I would like to see a
new (minor) release that is strictly the result of a 'bug blitz' by the
programmers, with no new features.
Ward
- Original Message -
From:
I just downloaded 7.4. I had been using the Family Search ID field as a storage
field, and now the program will not let me empty the field. It will allow me to
edit the User ID and AFN. I have only 3 people with something there, that I
know of. What I had there, is the word NONE with the RIN
Whilst it seems to me that there is nothing to stop V6 Delux being used on
one machine and V7 Delux on another, there is a problem in exchanging files
as those created using V7 are not compatible with V6, Although those created
using V6 will be converted to the V7 format when run on V7.
Ron
Yep. Messes up Intellishare until all are on the later version. Unless V6
collaborators are disinherited, this ends up with an A and a B master as
best case. The B master collects and returns V6 merges, copies being merged to
the V7 A master along with contributions from V7 collaborators. V7
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named and would like to show them in the list of brothers and
sisters. How is this done?
Helen
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
That's only if you have v3, 4, 5, or 6. The website said the same for 7.0
updates.
Thanks for using Legacy.
Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
supp...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
We are changing the world of genealogy!
When replying to this message,
On 2010/02/02 20:11, RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote:
This is what I read on the web page. I left it for a few days. On
reading it while awake, I notice that 7.0 is not in the list. Oops.
This download will overwrite earlier versions with Legacy 7.4
Standard Edition. If you are using the Deluxe
Huh?
--
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
In doing transcribing for both Ancestry and Family Search, I have found
children several years old still named Baby.
Marilyn
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:08 PM, John S. Adams oldbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Huh?
--
I found a newspaper clipping for
On 2010/02/02 21:49, ci...@treadles.ca wrote:
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named and would like to show them in the list of brothers and
sisters. How is this done?
I know what you want to do, but, as John Adams says, 'Huh?'
If the child didn't
I think what the OP is saying is that there are one or more babies that died
early in their infancies prior to the parents deciding upon a given name. It
seemed to be a common practice amongst the American pioneers that sometimes
children were not immediately named until days or even weeks
Helen,
I can only tell you what I have done with my unnamed children... I just
put them in with no first name, if a birth/death date is known, you can
enter that. If the sex is also unknown, there is a button for that, over
the locations there is a button for male, female or ?.
For headstones
One reason, which I learned not only from diaries I have from some colonial
ancestors, but also from living in the Alaskan bush, is that so many babies
died, that they didn't formally name the child until sure the baby would
survive. Christians were more likely to do so because of baptisms, if
Mike stated, If the child didn't live long enough to be named, then it
certainly couldn't have been an ancestor of you or anyone :-)
That is absolutely not true Mike. Ever heard of a stillborn child? My
grandmother had three of them, and only two of them were named, twin
Abeare's. That was it.
Obviously a child who died very young, maybe within a day or two of birth.
Elizabeth C
John S. Adams wrote:
Huh?
--
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named
Legacy User Group
On 2010/02/03 03:23, Marvin Angelique Welch wrote:
Mike stated, If the child didn't live long enough to be named, then it
certainly couldn't have been an ancestor of you or anyone :-)
That is absolutely not true Mike. Ever heard of a stillborn child? My
grandmother had three of them, and
The mix-up is in wording the definition of ancestor. You would be
right to say that the child would not be an ancestor in the defined
sense of the word (such as a remote grandparent). However, there is
still a genetic relationship so many still call them ancestors. So, my
unnamed Aunts and Uncles
I reported it - can't say if it is on their fix-it list or not though... lol
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Rita Lynn McKale cagr...@comporium.netwrote:
Thanks Heather,
That is exactly what I was trying to say. I don't know if they share a
father or not so I think I will leave it the
This thread reminds me of one of the funniest census entries I've come
across.
An entry for a 2 year old child:
No Name, 2, male, and fool for a mother...
I guess the enumerator thought anyone who hadn't named a child after 2 years
wasn't too bright.
John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA
This thread reminds me of one of the funniest census entries I've come
across.
An entry for a 2 year old child:
No Name, 2, male, and fool for a mother...
I guess the enumerator thought anyone who hadn't named a child after 2 years
wasn't too bright.
John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA
32 matches
Mail list logo
