A friendly Hi!
We have been having a discussion on Ancestry boards about sourcing
Swedish records.
In your opinion, would the tool that you would use to cite a piece of
information should not be around in 200 years, would you still include
the tool ?
Keep in mind, the 'tool'
Tim
Legacy User
What do you mean by tool?
If you mean a website, of course I would cite the website. Just like I would
cite a book, a manuscript, an FHL microfilm, or any other object or tool that
may or may not be in existence in 200 years.
If I didn't cite the website, I might leave the impression I
example? Is the tool your Legacy program? or is the microfilm
reader? I think my brain is not working at full capacity today; I'm
not understanding things very well, haha! Kathy
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Tim Rosenlof spa...@xmission.com wrote:
A friendly Hi!
We have been having a
On 02/11/2010 16:57, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
We have been having a discussion on Ancestry boards about sourcing
Swedish records.
In your opinion, would the tool that you would use to cite a piece of
information should not be around in 200 years, would you still include
the tool ?
Not quite sure
Hi,
No relevance. General OT question.
I will now go back under my rock.
Tim
On 11/2/2010 12:50 PM, Jenny M Benson wrote:
On 02/11/2010 16:57, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
We have been having a discussion on Ancestry boards about sourcing
Swedish records.
In your opinion, would the tool that you
5 matches
Mail list logo
