[LegacyUG] Incorrect gender entries

2010-02-25 Thread mike bridgeford
I have incorrectly put Jean Malcom as a Male, and entered all the BMD data for her. I now find she is a female married to Andrew Ogg, a male. Inadvertently I entered Andrew as a female, until I realized my mistake. How can I switch the genders for these two people, and make Jean a female and

Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect gender entries

2010-02-25 Thread Ron Ferguson
Mike, There is no need to delete, nor should you. From the Help files: ? To swap positions: 1. Choose Swap Husband and Wife from the Edit menu. Legacy asks for confirmation that you want to swap the two individuals and change their gender. 2. Click OK to make the change. Ron Ferguson

[LegacyUG] Credibility analysis of evidence

2010-02-25 Thread Nick Ingham
As a relatively new user of Legacy, I am finding the source writer system to be a great tool.   I have been studying the brilliant ‘Evidence Explained’ by Elizabeth Shown Mills  and, in accordance with Ms Mills’ suggestions, I would like to be able to attach a short ‘credibility analysis’

Re: [LegacyUG] Credibility analysis of evidence

2010-02-25 Thread Ron Ferguson
Nick, Just an observation, the Surety Rating for sources can be used in this way provided that you consider what standard you wish to apply to each rating. It would not be perfect, I agree, but it is the best we've got at the moment! Ron Ferguson

Re: [LegacyUG] Best way to source a certificate

2010-02-25 Thread Jenny M Benson
Tony Rolfe wrote If you have a marriage (or birth or death) certificate and want to use it as a source for various data, should you create one source for each certificate? Or is it better to have a single source Marriage Certificate and put each certificate's data as detail for the main source?

Re: [LegacyUG] Credibility analysis of evidence

2010-02-25 Thread Jenny M Benson
Nick Ingham wrote I have been studying the brilliant ‘Evidence Explained’ by Elizabeth Shown Mills  and, in accordance with Ms Mills’ suggestions, I would like to be able to attach a short ‘credibility analysis’ each time I extract a particular piece of information from my sources – basically to

RE: [LegacyUG] family file location problem

2010-02-25 Thread leo macdonald
Hi Judy, The most likely place where your saved backup files are stored is in your C/Legacy/Data. In order to confirm if this is where you are saving them you can do the following, with legacy open go to the top left corner of the page and click Filebackup family fileon the popup screen

Re: [LegacyUG] family file location problem

2010-02-25 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
First, as soon as you opened a file by inputting any data, you created un unnamed file. When you left the program, you were asked to name this file. If you entered any valid name, when you open Legacy next time, that file name is found under the drop down menu File (includes up to last four).

Re: [LegacyUG] family file location problem

2010-02-25 Thread George/Kathy
Judy, Here's what I have. George Under Help menu-General Information, Family File Information, What does your file information read for – Family File Path? C:\Legacy\Data\name of my file.fdb What does your file information read for – Legacy Path? C:\Legacy\ Under Customize-Locations What does

Re: [LegacyUG] Best way to source a certificate

2010-02-25 Thread Tony Rolfe
Kirsten, I've just had a search through the archives and reference is made to a thread in 2008. However, the archives don't seem to go that far back, unless I'm missing something. Cheers Tony On 25/02/2010 6:31 PM, Kirsten Bowman wrote: Tony: Splitting hairs here, but part of the answer

[LegacyUG] family file location problem‏

2010-02-25 Thread Judy Hogel
Dear Leo, George and Rich, Thanks for your responses which comfirmed that my family file was not being saved in an appropriate folder. With your information I believe I have solved my problem. Thanks so much. Judy _ Your

Re: [LegacyUG] Best way to source a certificate

2010-02-25 Thread Tony Rolfe
Thanks to everyone for their help so far I'm inclined to treat a physical piece of paper as a source in its own right and to treat a database of related data as a single source. Seems logical that way. So, certificates are split and indices are lumped. One thing is puzzling me, though. With

Re: [LegacyUG] Best way to source a certificate

2010-02-25 Thread Jenny M Benson
Tony Rolfe wrote I've just had a search through the archives and reference is made to a thread in 2008. However, the archives don't seem to go that far back, unless I'm missing something. Yes, you are! You're missing the bit just a bit further down this message - and every other one - which

Re: [LegacyUG] Credibility analysis of evidence

2010-02-25 Thread Nick Ingham
Many thanks to Ron, Jenny, Charles and Carol for your responses and suggestions, which I will take on board. Nick --- On Thu, 25/2/10, Nick Ingham nicking...@btinternet.com wrote: From: Nick Ingham nicking...@btinternet.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Credibility analysis of evidence To:

[LegacyUG] tags

2010-02-25 Thread Inta Warner
This question probably has a blindingly obvious answer - but I can't find it. I am a relatively new comer to Legacy and family history. Instead of using the to do list (I find it rather cumbersome since I have HEAPS of to do items!)I have decided to tag individuals whose details I can chase up in

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

2010-02-25 Thread Ron Ferguson
Inta Warner wrote: This question probably has a blindingly obvious answer - but I can't find it. I am a relatively new comer to Legacy and family history. Instead of using the to do list (I find it rather cumbersome since I have HEAPS of to do items!)I have decided to tag individuals whose

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

2010-02-25 Thread Cathy-0
Inta, It sounds to me that you might want to look into the To Do Tasks instead of just relying on tags. In the To Do Tasks, you can list everything you want to research for a person and include locality and the repository (i.e., LDS Family History Centre) where you are to search. You can then

RE: [LegacyUG] Credibility analysis of evidence

2010-02-25 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Nick: Also keep in mind that _Evidence Explained_ was written for a fairly broad audience including professional genealogists and history writers. Some aspects of the book could be considered overkill for the family history researcher working at a hobbyist level while a professional