Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

2019-12-20 Thread Michal Palenik
om a long time age) was "1 day work of a semi experienced mapper" (which would take into account availability of aerial photos or other sources to import) m -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline

2015-10-14 Thread Michal Palenik
by frederik was that you (as data consumer), when using data for nominatim/mapnik/... should be able to drop all addr:* elements from OSM and use addr from that external data (just as postcodes for US in nominatim are from external data and not OSM) importing into osm is way different a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] When should ODbL apply to geocoding

2015-09-29 Thread Michal Palenik
l > ___ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Geocoding as produced work

2015-09-23 Thread Michal Palenik
gt; > > I don't think there is an election going on any time soon, so please > tone down the rhetoric. It's simply the case that we have the licence we > have and at least for the immediate future we have to live with it and > give our data consumers guidance in the current frame work, not

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Regarding community guidelines for map layers

2014-11-07 Thread Michal Palenik
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Regarding community guidelines for map layers

2014-11-05 Thread Michal Palenik
only those items that are not already in OSM, then that selection (not the whole second database) becomes a work derived from OSM - because OSM was used as a mask to produce it. which I agree with -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Updated geocoding community guideline proposal

2014-10-29 Thread Michal Palenik
. michal ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Updated geocoding community guideline proposal

2014-10-29 Thread Michal Palenik
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:03:03PM -0400, Alex Barth wrote: Hey Michal - On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Michal Palenik michal.pale...@freemap.sk wrote: alex, please read 4.6 of odbl, which basically says there is no difference between derivative db and produced work with regards

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using description from wikipedia text

2014-10-18 Thread Michal Palenik
of the mountain range. Thanks, Tom Gregorovic ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Updated geocoding community guideline proposal

2014-07-15 Thread Michal Palenik
databases has to be released under an open licence. so the real question is which databases does geocoding create. clearly it creates a derivative database (select only those lat-lon which match some of these addresses) btw, cp planet.osm.bz2 planet.png creates a produced work... -- michal

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Updated geocoding community guideline proposal

2014-07-15 Thread Michal Palenik
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:22:29PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2014-07-15 18:01 GMT+02:00 Michal Palenik michal.pale...@freemap.sk: btw, cp planet.osm.bz2 planet.png creates a produced work... LOL I'd doubt this, because an image is likely not to be read like in disk image

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Guideline review: Substantial

2014-05-10 Thread Michal Palenik
divided by 3 if area is larrger than X there would be some technical discussion on all the rules, but the underlying standard should be stable. michal -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] The edges of share-alike on data Re: Attribution

2014-05-05 Thread Michal Palenik
/myproject:maxspeed/... ridiculous. so, for the avoidance of doubt I wanted to say that is definitely a derivative db (from information provided) and not a collective db. michal -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] produced work vs. derivative db

2013-07-15 Thread Michal Palenik
___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk http://wiki.freemap.sk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] produced work vs. derivative db

2013-03-07 Thread Michal Palenik
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Use_Cases#Using_OSM_data_for_the_production_of_a_hand-made_map still set a hard line between produced work and derivative database. michal On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:15:57PM +0100, Michal Palenik wrote: may i add a question into faq/use cases: Q: I want

[OSM-legal-talk] produced work vs. derivative db

2013-03-04 Thread Michal Palenik
...) and then publishes it as an online tilemap/printed map. claiming it to be a produced work under a commercial licence. is it a produced work? is it also a derivative database? (if so, which odbl clause kicks in to state this?) thanks michal -- michal palenik www.freemap.sk www.oma.sk http

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] produced work vs. derivative db

2013-03-04 Thread Michal Palenik
:53, Michal Palenik wrote: after reading all the documents/wiki/mailinglist I am still confused: what forces producers to publish a derivative database and not just produced work? Clause 4.6 of the ODbL, which says if you publish a produced work you must make the database it was produced