At least in English,
"not reuse the Information in a way that suggests that it is official or
that Licensor approves your use of the Information;
take all reasonable steps to ensure that the uses permitted above do not
mislead others and that the Information itself is not misrepresented."
reads as
sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 15:28, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> Maybe they assume that it is covered
> anyway by moral rights?
>
> But ODBL waives moral rights if allowed
> by law,
> it attempts to block asserting such claims,
> and so on.
>
> Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer etc
14 Jul 2020, 14:54 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
>> On 14. Jul 2020, at 12:40, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Such data is incompatible with
>> OSM requirements, must not be
>> imported, must be removed as
>> copyright violation if added already.
>>
sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 12:40, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk
> wrote:
>
> Such data is incompatible with
> OSM requirements, must not be
> imported, must be removed as
> copyright violation if added already.
on the plus side there is a declaration of the license steward
14 Jul 2020, 11:37 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> Can we guarantee that the contained information is not "misrepresented"?
>
No. ODBL has no such restrictions.
Therefore OSM data can be used in
several evil or non-evil ways
that would violate such clauses.
Such data is incompatible with
OSM
In recent local discussions it has emerged that some license has conditions
for the reuse of the data, which may eventually not be completely
compatible with OSM.
In particular it relates to an Italian license which states as a condition
you have to
"not reuse the Information in a way that
