On 04/09/2010, at 10:30 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
If it absolutely has to be one thing or the other I'd say it is a Produced
Work.
Does it have to be though? I can't see anything in the ODbL that says Derived
Database and Produced Work are mutually exclusive.
A produced work is:
a work (such as
Hello,
Is Google Maps(MapMaker) now starting to use OSM data? I've been adding a lot
of data to OSM this past month, and have seen that data also appearing on
Google Maps. Most blatant is a screw-up I made to the coastline in my area...
Google now has it too :-)
Thanks,
Eric Jarvies
On 7 September 2010 13:12, Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx wrote:
Is Google Maps(MapMaker) now starting to use OSM data? I've been adding a
lot of data to OSM this past month, and have seen that data also appearing on
Google Maps. Most blatant is a screw-up I made to the coastline in my
Grant,
Yes, I can point to an example... but prior to bringing attention to the
matter/area, I would instead prefer to monitor it and see what else appears.
The coastline, akaik, is not editable by users/contributors, which is why I
asked if Google is now using OSM data.
Eric
On Sep 7,
On 7 September 2010 14:51, Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx wrote:
Grant,
Yes, I can point to an example... but prior to bringing attention to the
matter/area, I would instead prefer to monitor it and see what else appears.
The coastline, akaik, is not editable by users/contributors, which is
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 09/05/2010 06:01 AM, Anthony wrote:
And then the ODbL says you can do certain things provided you meet
certain conditions?
Yes. DB right covers the whole
Maybe. OSM existed two years before OSMF, so OSMF would probably
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 09/05/2010 06:01 AM, Anthony wrote:
I think that it's the same with OSM: DbCL ensures that OSM can apply ODbL to
the result of combining all the individual
On 09/07/2010 04:00 PM, Anthony wrote:
Maybe. OSM existed two years before OSMF, so OSMF would probably have
a pretty tough time claiming that it is the maker of the database.
They are the maker of the current database.
, and copyright may cover the DB or the aggregated contents.
Yes,
On 7 September 2010 16:13, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 09/05/2010 06:01 AM, Anthony wrote:
I think that it's the same with OSM: DbCL ensures that OSM can
Dear Eric,
Your replies from Grant (on the server team) and Emilie (OSMF Board
member) are from people who would normally deal with these issues.
;-)
As far as I know Map Maker does not use OSM data, but no consumer of
OSM data is obliged to tell OSM that they are using OSM data. They
are only
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
If its the case that OSMF doesn't have a database right in the
contents of its database, then, logically, that right would be jointly
owned by all contributors.
Ah, I see there is a provision for this in the EU database
Eric
It is your content and your copyright. If you believe that Google or anyone
else is infringing your copyright then it is your right to take up this
issue with them directly.
Most infringments are accidental and if you approach the infringer in a
helpful and sympathetic way then they will
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx wrote:
On Sep 7, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
Also, as more data sets are opening up it is possible that Map Maker
and OSM editors are using similar sources.
Yes, I understand this and the context you are explaining it
On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx wrote:
On Sep 7, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
Also, as more data sets are opening up it is possible that Map Maker
and OSM editors are using similar sources.
Yes, I
2010/9/7 ed...@billiau.net:
I got far enough through the Australian Copyright Act at the weekend to
discover that this won't extend to Australia.
does this count, given that the contract (CT) is British law?
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:38 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/7 ed...@billiau.net:
I got far enough through the Australian Copyright Act at the weekend to
discover that this won't extend to Australia.
does this count, given that the contract (CT) is British law?
16 matches
Mail list logo
