This is a solid proposal and has my support.
As long as the purpose of a geocoder is geocoding, and not reverse engineering
OSM,
then it sensibly fits within the notions of an ODbL produced work.
What I wonder is how we will move to decision making on the proposal? What's
the OSMF process?
Hi,
On 07/15/2014 01:26 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
As long as the purpose of a geocoder is geocoding, and not reverse
engineering OSM, then it sensibly fits within the notions of an ODbL produced
work.
What if there are two processes run on a city extract - one is a SELECT
* FROM
On 2014-07-15 4:26 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
As long as the purpose of a geocoder is geocoding, and not reverse
engineering OSM,
then it sensibly fits within the notions of an ODbL produced work.
A geocoder isn't a produced work or a derived database - it's software.
Do you mean a geocoding
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
On 2014-07-14 11:26 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
Also if we assume geocoding yields Produced Work the definition of
Substantial doesn't matter.
A database that is based upon the Database, and includes any translation,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:26:28AM -0700, Mikel Maron wrote:
As long as the purpose of a geocoder is geocoding, and not reverse
engineering OSM,
then it sensibly fits within the notions of an ODbL produced work.
please, read ODbL...
produced work is
“Produced Work” – a work (such as an
2014-07-15 18:01 GMT+02:00 Michal Palenik michal.pale...@freemap.sk:
btw, cp planet.osm.bz2 planet.png creates a produced work...
LOL
I'd doubt this, because an image is likely not to be read like in disk
image, and not every file with an png extension will be considered an
image...
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Mikel Maron mikel.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a solid proposal and has my support.
+1
This is a great effort to clarify something that causes a lot of
confusion, and does so within the context of the current license. Very
productive!
As long as the purpose
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:22:29PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-07-15 18:01 GMT+02:00 Michal Palenik michal.pale...@freemap.sk:
btw, cp planet.osm.bz2 planet.png creates a produced work...
LOL
I'd doubt this, because an image is likely not to be read like in disk
image, and not
On 11 July 2014 03:52, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
I just updated the Wiki with a proposed community guideline on geocoding.
Please review:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline
The whole point of the share-alike aspect of our licence is to stop
