Am Wed, 06 Dec 2017 23:26:08 -0800
schrieb junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
> I adjuststed the model name in the database to match your reported
> Exif model name. I also added the Pentax mount to the other lens
> mentioned in personal email. I don't know why your private database
> files aren't
Am Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:32:01 +0100
schrieb Аl Воgnеr <darktable...@corr.eu.org>:
> Am Wed, 06 Dec 2017 23:26:08 -0800
> schrieb junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
>
> > I adjuststed the model name in the database to match your reported
> > Exif model name.
I found anothe
Am Wed, 06 Dec 2017 23:26:08 -0800
schrieb junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
> I adjuststed the model name in the database to match your reported
> Exif model name. I also added the Pentax mount to the other lens
> mentioned in personal email. I don't know why your private database
> files aren't
Am Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:25:31 -0800
schrieb junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
> One other thing you might want to check is that at least one of the
> slr-pentax.xml files somewhere in one of the database paths has all
> the mappings ( tags) between the many Pentax K-something
> mounts, as found at the
Am Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:30:17 -0400
schrieb Robert Lounsberry :
> I have a batch of lenses coming in tomorrow that I'll be working on
Can you tell us the lenses?
Personally I am interested in Pentax lenses, especially these which are
designed for APS-C but work fine with fullformat and then
Am Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:23:01 -0400
schrieb Robert Lounsberry :
Thanks Robert,
> I just submitted the Sigma 24mm f1.4 on canon mount, but not the 1.8.
the problem with the 24mm 1.8 macro and a lot of other Sigma lenses, is
the missing model name, so darktable / lensfun can identify the lens. I
Am Thu, 14 Jun 2018 23:59:01 +0300
schrieb Roman Lebedev :
> > Maybe someone can give a hint, how the metadata have to be changed,
> > so dt can recognize the lens? I asked this a few times ago, but
> > never got an answer.
> Last thing i heard was that exiv2 simply threw their hands up into
>
Am Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:33:30 +0100
schrieb Thomas Stieler :
> Am Montag, den 15.01.2018, 12:10 + schrieb DeeMo Design:
> > Might be worth listing which Pentax Lenses you have - I have
> > uploaded some lately - save you duplicating I'll confirm if I have
> > uploaded and
Am Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:36:16 -0800
schrieb junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
> > Your profile can now be selected manually (only). I have put it
> > ~/.local/share/lensfun But it is not recognized automatically.
>
> I can't explain that. If there's any visible difference in the name
> used in the
There are a lot of lenses designed for APS-C which are working with
fullframe cameras. For Pentax compare
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/10/compatibility-of-da-lenses-on-full.html
I tried the Pentax DA 35/2.4 AL with a Pentax K-1 in fullframe mode
(works fine). The lens is available in the
https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/issues/895
In May "Pulce" uploaded a lensfun calibration for the brandnew Ricoh GR
III. I couldn't find this calibration in the last git version. I am
sure you do it better than I, because my version based on this one,
doesn't work automatically with Ubuntu
Am Sat, 7 Dec 2019 00:32:12 +0100
schrieb Аl Воgnеr :
[2nd version, with subscribed email-address, sorry!]
> The annoying thing is to choose a lens for every photo. See attached
> screenshot (I hope it isn't removed in the mailinglist)
Since the last small screenshot was not removed by th
I am trying to setup a profile for a Ricoh GR III using Ubuntu
19.10 and Lensfun 0.3.2-4.
The lenscorrection-data I found in the web, but to inlcude it in my
Ubuntu-PC, so that the profile is recognized automatically, is not so
easy.
I put the xml-file in:
~/.local/share/lensfun
13 matches
Mail list logo