Re: Failed unit tests on Linux

2008-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My experience shows why Linux is not exactly taking the world by storm. Heh, I think the reasons may be a little more various and complicated than that. It wasn't the source install that wiped gnome. Dis-installing

Re: Failed unit tests on Linux

2008-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mar 6, 8:19 am, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, you can't just remove system python installation like that, it's a feature. And a slight drawback of python being so ubiquitous today :-) Thanks for this. Saves me having to ask on comp.lang.python. Edward

Re: Leo 4.4.8 b1 released

2008-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mar 6, 8:02 am, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you know, there are questions about whether Leo works reliably on Linux with Python 2.5. I shall be running tests on Linux soon. In the meantime, Leo is probably safe on Linux. Some preliminary results: No xwindows crash

Re: mangled leo files

2008-03-06 Thread Lon
On Mar 6, 6:00 am, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 5, 9:47 am, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:03:54 -0800 (PST) Lon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The second case is just a slight variation with the node v7 moved down to be a child of v5. There

Re: Failed unit tests on Linux

2008-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First I build Tcl 8.5.1 from source ... then Tk 8.5.1 from source ... then python from source Thanks! Edward --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Failed unit tests on Linux

2008-03-06 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In short, all OS's are, or can be made to be, pretty much the same. That being so, Linux does indeed have real advantages for programmers. It's so cool to be able to enable thousands of packages from the package