Re: Bug: expand-next-level keeps counting beyond maximum level

to childLevel2. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 7:12:30 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:31 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I do think it would be better in the status area. It's a little >> distracting in the log pane. >

Re: can not load enabled plugin: viewrendered3 bigdash

Lewis, it doesn't seem too likely that is related. QtWebEngine is a different web platform based on Chromium (versus WebKit). So the two are likely unrelated, QtWebEngine was added after QtWebEngine. On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 7:21:02 AM UTC-4, lewis wrote: > > Hi Edward, > > I didn't found

Re: Bug: expand-next-level keeps counting beyond maximum level

I do think it would be better in the status area. It's a little distracting in the log pane. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 4:17:57 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:16 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Yep, works as exp

Re: Bug: expand-next-level keeps counting beyond maximum level

Yep, works as expected now. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 3:09:10 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:21 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmai

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

I agree with you that change Alt-end to goto-last-sibling makes more sense and that Alt-RtArrow is better left to personalized settings. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 4:17:01 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Richard Andersen > wrote: >

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

I see your point. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:00 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I do not disagree with you that it has the feel of an easter egg. But by >> th

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

would propose that both the contextual binding and the binding of Alt-End be included. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 11:35:20 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:18 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Right now the right

Re: Bug: marking/unmarking a node makes @s dirty

Okay, I will file this tomorrow. Distilling more coherently my findings from this post. On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 8:13:32 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:00 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Additionally, rena

Re: Bug: marking/unmarking a node makes @s dirty

. This seems unnecessary and avoidable. The e is if the node being edited is an @path node. Obviously if a parent @path node is renamed then all @ child nodes should be set to dirty. On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 1:05:41 PM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Sorry, see my previous follow up post for c

Re: FYI: #273 warns about big-text issues

Congrats! Leo 5.3 will be a great release! On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 1:44:42 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > The new #273 issue > will remain open indefinitely, per recent discussions about when to close > bugs. It joins two other

Re: Bug: marking/unmarking a node makes @s dirty

Sorry, see my previous follow up post for correct details. On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 12:53:39 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:17 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Perhaps I should have been more specific. Marking is tr

Re: Bug: marking/unmarking a node makes @s dirty

, 2016 at 11:17:52 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Perhaps I should have been more specific. Marking is triggering a > recursive dirty setting regardless of node type. There is no reason > marking a non @ parent node should set all child nodes (@ or > not) dirty. In this case

Re: Bug: marking/unmarking a node makes @s dirty

f an @path node. I realize this is ugly and complex. Perhaps it can spur a more elegant solution to unnecessarily writing @ nodes if nothing has changed in their headline/body. On Monday, April 25, 2016 at 5:33:55 PM UTC-4, Terry Brown wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:16:08 -0700

Bug: marking/unmarking a node makes @s dirty

I think "dirty" is the right word, basically Leo thinks the file was altered. Not only does it do this for the current node but it will also do it recursively for all child nodes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe

Improvement of outline pane performance

On my setup Py2.7/Qt4.8/Win7 Leo has noticeable performance issues in the outline pane when holding down the Up/Down arrows. I've analyzed the behavior and from past conversations I've determined the slowdown/lag is due to syntax highlighting in node bodies. The more code in the body, the

Re: Strange scrolling/redrawing using keyboard navigation/moves in outline pane

move made with the arrow keys. Whatever else is happening this has the effect of making movement very sluggish. On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:04:40 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:05 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > &g

Re: Autocompletion like NPP

That I shall leave to Rob. On Friday, April 22, 2016 at 3:53:10 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:49 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Though Leo is limited to Leo source and the Python standard library.

Re: Autocompletion like NPP

Though Leo is limited to Leo source and the Python standard library. Rob's interest was in two things, taken from your quote:: - "everywhere in the current file" - "the lexer that corresponds to the computer language of the file" Rob was talking about an expansion of the autocompleter,

Re: Strange scrolling/redrawing using keyboard navigation/moves in outline pane

This appears to be the same issue as this on the github page <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/265>. The rev (​5235145) listed in the issue does not fix the problem. I will add this thread to the github issue. On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:49:22 AM UTC-4, john lunzer

Re: Strange scrolling/redrawing using keyboard navigation/moves in outline pane

with the arrows up or down it scrolls back. On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:36:53 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > I found another situation which causes this. When any chapter is active, > even "main", if you click the drop down menu for chapters there is an > outline pane

Re: Strange scrolling/redrawing using keyboard navigation/moves in outline pane

2:25:07 PM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Ahh, this is @chapter related. If in the "main" chapter this behavior does > not occur. Only when in a chapter other than main. > > On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 1:54:43 PM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: >> >> S

Re: Strange scrolling/redrawing using keyboard navigation/moves in outline pane

Ahh, this is @chapter related. If in the "main" chapter this behavior does not occur. Only when in a chapter other than main. On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 1:54:43 PM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Saving the outline also makes the scrolling jump to an not very us

Re: Strange scrolling/redrawing using keyboard navigation/moves in outline pane

Saving the outline also makes the scrolling jump to an not very useful location. On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 1:40:44 PM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Most recent Rev: d5915c3. Every action in the outline pane using the arrow > keys appears to trigger a redraw and also scrolls th

Strange scrolling/redrawing using keyboard navigation/moves in outline pane

Most recent Rev: d5915c3. Every action in the outline pane using the arrow keys appears to trigger a redraw and also scrolls the outline pane both vertically and horizontally. This is distracting to say the least. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Rev 7b6ae39: lots of @chapter work

UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Thank you very much Edward. I will test things out. I appreciate the work > on the @chapter code. I hope it doesn't feel fruitless, I think many can > benefit from these improved @chapter features once they know what can be > done with them. > &g

Re: Rev 7b6ae39: lots of @chapter work

Thank you very much Edward. I will test things out. I appreciate the work on the @chapter code. I hope it doesn't feel fruitless, I think many can benefit from these improved @chapter features once they know what can be done with them. I believe @chapter to be at least one of the answers to

Re: rev 7cba9eb: @chapter defines commands, bindings

wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:13 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Thank you for your prompt attention, enjoying using the new chapters >> capabilities. >> >> I will file an enhancement request for completeness sake (I feel they >&

Re: Leo temporarily become unresponsive after executing chapter-select

It is not mere preference. But alas I am in the wrong, chapter-select-custom is necessary to custom key bindings. I overlooked this very important feature for chapters. On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 12:41:42 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:34 AM, john lunze

Re: Leo temporarily become unresponsive after executing chapter-select

:02 AM, Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:06 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> ​> ​ >> This is the original non-custom chapter-select command >> ​. >> >> Hmm

Leo temporarily become unresponsive after executing chapter-select

This is the original non-custom chapter-select command. Additionally sometimes after the unresponsiveness the tree is not fully drawn. This may still have something to do with @chapter nodes whose headlines contain *special* characters (spaces, slashes, etc). My setup is my standard, Win7

Re: How to collaborate using Leo

I'm currently using Alt+l for refresh-from-disk. It wasn't being used (I don't think) and seems logical. If a hotkey you want is being used you can go into the global settings and remove it or change it. I'm not sure if personal settings override global settings or conflict. On Monday, April

Re: i3 tiling window manager is free_layout analog

Yes, please keep us informed. As per usual, I didn't even know such a feature existed and or even what it is for. Leo is vast. On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 6:35:43 PM UTC-4, Terry Brown wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 15:10:49 -0500 > "'Terry Brown' via leo-editor"

Re: [theme] how to setup Leo cursor size and highlight currently line?

s other problem > - the self. is look like not keyword! > - as attachment snapshot ... > > > BTW: > how to transform sublime text 's theme into leo? > there is some script or tools ? > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:19 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com >

Re: [theme] how to setup Leo cursor size and highlight currently line?

function_color = #cb4b16 On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 3:52:52 PM UTC-4, Zoom.Quiet wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:46 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > I can speak to a big cursor which can be set through: > > > > @int qt-cursor-width = 3 > > yes!

Re: [theme] how to setup Leo cursor size and highlight currently line?

I can speak to a big cursor which can be set through: @int qt-cursor-width = 3 I use a value of 3 but you can make it much bigger if you wish. On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 3:33:48 PM UTC-4, Zoom.Quiet wrote: > > thanks EKR's great job. i use Leo from 2005 year, now enjoy in MAC ;-) > > but

Re: Improved spell checking

Hmm... interesting... the .whl file I tried to install said my 64-bit platform was not supported. Did you install the 32bit binary in the .exe installer? On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:08:02 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:58 AM, john lunzer <lun...@

Re: Leo 5.2 How to use sublimte 2 dark theme ?

You may not need to copy an entirely new settings file but simply the @button reload-styles node from a theme that contains it. I would try that first before starting anew. On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 11:58:46 AM UTC-4, Zoom.Quiet wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:30 AM, john lunze

Re: Improved spell checking

, 2016 at 11:33:41 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > I did not realize that pyenchant was based on a C library > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 11:32:00 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: >> >> Good call, I get this: >> >> exception executing script >> >> Im

Re: Improved spell checking

I did not realize that pyenchant was based on a C library On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 11:32:00 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Good call, I get this: > > exception executing script > > ImportError: cannot import name utils > > only 4 lines > >

Re: Improved spell checking

AM UTC-4, Terry Brown wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:25:34 -0700 (PDT) > john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > My spell tab hasn't worked in the entire time I've used Leo. Only > > recently, a week or so, I've been able to see part of it before my

Re: Improved spell checking

My spell tab hasn't worked in the entire time I've used Leo. Only recently, a week or so, I've been able to see part of it before my outlines are fully loaded but when all files are finally loaded it disappears. I had assumed that the "spell tab" had been a remnant of an older age, but I

Re: Leo 5.2 How to use sublimte 2 dark theme ?

My understanding is that any time you make changes to your themes you need to press the "reload-styles" button located in myLeoSettings.leo, then save, then restart. On Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 11:14:18 PM UTC-4, Zoom.Quiet wrote: > > after up mail , i found the theme config tree in

Re: @bool check_for_changed_external_files not usable over slow network

-blocking method (threads/processes). At the very least the documentation should warn about using this feature in IO limited environments. On Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 3:44:48 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:41 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com

Re: @bool check_for_changed_external_files not usable over slow network

Either way, I would guess it is not the desire nor the intention for Leo to lock up in this case. On Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 3:37:22 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:17 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > I have Leo files with o

Exception using goto-prev-history-node

I am on rev: 8dc9b7f, Python 2.7, Qt4, Windows 7 exception executing command Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users\Lunz8748\Documents\sourcetreeapp\leo-editor\leo\core\leoCommands.py", line 5446, in redraw c.selectPosition(p2 or p) File

@bool check_for_changed_external_files not usable over slow network

I use Leo as a project manager. Both the code I work on and the groups of many small files are all on networked drives. In addition I connect to these drives over a VPN, an unfortunately slow VPN at that. I have Leo files with over 350 files located on networked drives. It appears that

Re: exception executing equal sized panes

will do. On Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 11:30:32 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:22 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> My setup: >> > > >> Leo 5.3-devel, build 20160411191235, Mon Apr 11 19:

Re: Can Leo render math in markdonw node ?

It appears that QtWebKit does support Latex. I found this link which shows some latex being rendered (didn't test it myself). You'd have to convert the MD math or mathml to Latex. Another option if Qt doesn't support this outright then there is a

exception executing equal sized panes

My setup: Leo 5.3-devel, build 20160411191235, Mon Apr 11 19:12:35 CDT 2016 Git repo info: branch = master, commit = 9351518184c3 Python 2.7.11, PyQt version 4.8.6 Windows 7 AMD64 (build 6.1.7601) SP1 exception executing command Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: rev 7cba9eb: @chapter defines commands, bindings

continual distraction. On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 10:51:40 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 7:15:30 PM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote: >> >> Can this be married with the new plain keys in tree feature as well? It >> would be convenient to type

Re: rev 7cba9eb: @chapter defines commands, bindings

the spaces should be replaced with underscores. On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 7:46:44 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > I updated to the most recent Rev and the @key feature doesn't appear to be > working for me. > > Here is my headline: @chapter Leo Tasks @key=Ctrl-3 > > M

Re: rev 7cba9eb: @chapter defines commands, bindings

I updated to the most recent Rev and the @key feature doesn't appear to be working for me. Here is my headline: @chapter Leo Tasks @key=Ctrl-3 My Leo info: Leo 5.3-devel, build 20160411191235, Mon Apr 11 19:12:35 CDT 2016 Git repo info: branch = master, commit = 9351518184c3 Python 2.7.11,

Re: rev 7cba9eb: @chapter defines commands, bindings

Can this be married with the new plain keys in tree feature as well? It would be convenient to type "1", "2", "3", "4", etc... to switch between chapters. A "chapter-select-forward" and "chapter-select-back" would be quite convenient additions as well. On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:46:13 PM

Traceback from trying to delete/rename an @chapter node

I opened up a Leo file with an @chapter node and tried to delete it and nothing happened. I then tried to remove the @chapter text from the node headline. Then I notice this traceback. I can't be sure if it was from the delete or trying to rename it. I'm not at the *most* recent but should be

Re: regex vs indices

Can you give an example? I'm a heavy user of regex and parser of text, I'd be interested in hearing about different ways of doing things. On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 7:26:11 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > Recent revs correct several bugs in the markdown importer. They all > involved the

Re: can leo editor prompt file changed

tions. A large >number of files could be changed (at least timestamp wise) very >easily by file system or version control actions > - trivial - add reference to leoExternalFiles.py from LeoPyRef.leo > > Cheers -Terry > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:01:10 -0700 (PDT) >

Re: can leo editor prompt file changed

08:36:46 -0500 >> "Edward K. Ream" <edre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 7:57 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Really? How do I activate this? >> > >> > ​@bool ch

Re: can leo editor prompt file changed

Really? How do I activate this? In my Leo setup I'm only notified of changes when I reload the Leo outline, but not when my outline is already open. I didn't think that Leo could passively check for external changes to files. On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 8:28:23 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:

Re: Proposal: remove/improve all chapter commands

This is why I crafted my methodology the way I did, because it would avoid any such "multi-select" problems. Many may not know but there is currently one multi-select command. A multi-select delete exists via the right click menu. So there must be some internals to support multi-select

Re: Proposal: remove/improve all chapter commands

/paste behavior. Yes on all marked nodes. This is the most flexible and general. On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 8:00:20 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:45 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > ​> cffm is clunky in this context, >

Re: Proposal: remove/improve all chapter commands

One last detail, there doesn't need to be a parent collecting node, the most intuitive option is behaving just like copy/cut/paste. On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 7:45:58 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > Ah, this is why I thought clone-marked-nodes moved it to the bottom, > bec

Re: Proposal: remove/improve all chapter commands

interested to hear where my proposal fails to improve Leo's functionality while remaining as simple as possible? On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:19:39 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:08 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > ​> ​ > I fin

Re: Proposal: remove/improve all chapter commands

PM UTC-4, Jacob Peck wrote: > > On 4/4/2016 3:03 PM, john lunzer wrote: > > >- Cut "cloned nodes" >- Past cloned nodes where I want it to be. >- Clones are no longer clones. > > Why aren't my clones clones anymore? > > Not a bug -- paste cre

Re: Proposal: remove/improve all chapter commands

lones clones anymore? On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 2:37:45 PM UTC-4, Terry Brown wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:08:57 -0700 (PDT) > john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > I fully agree. With one caveat, after the removal of : > > > > chapter-clone-nod

Re: Proposal: remove/improve all chapter commands

I fully agree. With one caveat, after the removal of : chapter-clone-node-to chapter-copy-node-to chapter-move-node-to There is still a need for these generalized commands that work anywhere: clone-marked-here copy-marked-here move-marked-here I find it near impossible

Re: Rev 8cec99a5: new chapters code

Done, thank you. I look forward to testing this out. On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 6:54:26 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:16 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > ​​why would I have any need to switch to a cloned node under a

Re: Rev 8cec99a5: new chapters code

On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 5:13:47 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > ​​ > Imo, if one is going to use chapters, then one *intentionally* is > limiting the viewing area. If you want to see more, switch to another > chapter. The main chapter is, as always, a synonym for the entire outline. >

Re: Rev 8cec99a5: new chapters code

This is a great start to the Chapters changes. To really make chapters a superpower (in order of importance): - If a clone is under an @chapters node and you "go to next clone" the chapter view should automatically activate. If somebody put a clone under an @chapters node they almost

Re: Keyboard hygiene

Remapping your keyboard can also give you additional options, for example a quite popular one is to remap Caps Lock to Ctrl. Additionally you can consider computer foot pedals which can activate modifier keys. There are a

Re: Taking a break

Go for it. No burn out. Got it, no burn out! On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 7:50:21 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > I'll be taking an enforced break for a few days. My left thumb hurts. > > Yesterday I completed the import-jupyter-notebook and > export-jupyter-notebook commands. They will be

Re: Gathering scripts: another alternative to fancy data structures

This is not a complete auto-complete solution (unavoidable pun). It doesn't do two things, it isn't automatic (and so will likely be overlooked) and it doesn't handle local variables or local objects. Unless I just don't have enough experience with it, it seems like it's geared toward modules.

Re: Gathering scripts: another alternative to fancy data structures

Would the "scraped" nodes automatically update when the original node updates? On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 9:15:22 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > The frequently asked-for feature if for clones that don't share children. > It's been amusing to think of multi-colored threaded trees,

Re: Simplifying Leo

I mentioned "Livelint" because it seems like low hanging fruit. But what would *really* be useful for programmers in Leo is Jedi. On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 7:59:14 AM UTC-4, john lunzer wrote: > > I have not tried Livecode yet. In my case I write code on a Windows > m

Re: ANN: Import/export to Jupyter (IPython) notebooks

I think I'd call it "Emacs syndrome". When placed into perspective it seems a little silly to try to confine Jupyter/IPython to a Leo frame. Heck, the current Leo IPython window isn't even confined to a Leo frame! On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 5:51:19 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On

Re: ANN: Import/export to Jupyter (IPython) notebooks

I was afraid of that. I had heard that the QtWebKit browser was slow. I was just hoping it wasn't *that* slow. On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Edward K. Ream > wrote: > >> On Thursday, March 24,

Re: ANN: Import/export to Jupyter (IPython) notebooks

Some random searching around the internet seems to indicate it should be possible <https://github.com/jbaayen/ipython-notebook-browser>. Though they used PySide. On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 2:02:22 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM

Re: ANN: Import/export to Jupyter (IPython) notebooks

I may have missed it but are there any plans to integrate have a QtWebKit frame inside Leo itself which could render the ipython/jupyter notebook? That way you'd never have to leave Leo. On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:13:56 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at

Re: Clicking on line a number...

It sounds like the bug related to @s . It has been reported previously (by myself) and is set to be fixed by the release of Leo 5.3 (though it will probably be much sooner). On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 6:25:55 AM UTC-4, lewis wrote: > > Oops, should be "and the space to the *left* of the

Re: Leo 5.2-final released

Great job Edward. A nice list of highlights there. On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 6:17:38 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > Leo 5.2-final is now available at SourceForge. > > > >

Ipython not working after recent update

Getting this in my console log: = leoIpython.py: can not import connect_qtconsole = leoIpython.py: can not import IPKernelApp My system config: Leo 5.1.1-devel, build 20160309092740, Wed Mar 9 09:27:40 CST 2016 Git repo info: branch = master, commit = e81b4060a0d5 Python 2.7.11, PyQt

Re: Schedule for 5.2

That is a good plan. I would advocate even a two week waiting period. We would not want a "bug release" after all of the effort being put into packaging up 5.2. On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 9:24:40 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 3:38:56 PM UTC-6, Edward K.

Re: Bug: move lines up/down triggers body redraw/rehighlight

I additionally have not found a way to reliably trigger any of this behavior except for the one I described for move-line-down. On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 9:27:13 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:20 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor < > leo-e...@googlegroups.com

Re: Documenting cff, cfm, cfa, cfam

On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 4:09:34 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < > off...@riseup.net > wrote: > > As far as Leo's code goes, ​ > > ​w​ > e are going to have to disagree about this one. Leo's one-letter > abbreviations

Re: Documenting cff, cfm, cfa, cfam

This is sound logic, I can't find fault with it. It may make sense for somebody who types these many times a day but some people will use clones far less. In this case the three letter abbreviations will obscure and hinder "discovery". I like the idea of command aliases for those that used

Re: Bug: move lines up/down triggers body redraw/rehighlight

Can confirm seeing what Terry saw as well. Body frame thought it was at end of document but wasn't. I was able to get it to reset by simple scrolling up and scrolling back down. On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 6:53:25 AM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote: > > No, actually the move-line-up or move-lin

Re: Bug: move lines up/down triggers body redraw/rehighlight

position is at the very bottom and I use a move-line-up OR move-line-down. On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:31:11 PM UTC-5, Terry Brown wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 13:46:02 -0800 (PST) > john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > Yes, see OP, based on my memory this is b

Re: Bug: move lines up/down triggers body redraw/rehighlight

Yes, see OP, based on my memory this is brand new behavior. I can check out a previous rev if necessary. It may require a body that is longer than the length of the screen. On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 4:23:39 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:50 AM,

Bug: move lines up/down triggers body redraw/rehighlight

Just as the subject says. At rev 3cf3c17. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

Re: Bug: Word wrapping of long strings not working after recent updates

Great work, I'm glad we got to keep it. On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 5:13:05 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:54 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Thank you for tracking it down! Maybe terry can chime in, he often has >&

Re: Bug: Word wrapping of long strings not working after recent updates

Thank you for tracking it down! Maybe terry can chime in, he often has some insight on Qt related issues. I'm hoping that we can keep the new invisibles because as you'll see in a different post I've already found them useful. On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:41:35 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream

Heads up on new invisibles, tabs look different!

I had some json files with indentations which had a combination of tabs and spaces. Before and after the switch to the new invisibles everything looked like it was matched up perfectly and since the old invisibles didn't make a distinction between tabs and spaces I just assumed everything was

Bug: Word wrapping of long strings not working after recent updates

I believe it was after the new invisibles update. The previous wrapping behavior is not working and long strings go past the beyond the bounds of the body pane. Some stuff still wraps. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To

Re: A solution to views based on Edward's recent clone work

I'll post an enhancement request for just the chapters related points I made in this post and then link to this thread. On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:02:31 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:10 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >

Re: A solution to views based on Edward's recent clone work

are going to be useful for views. Anyway... I'll stop harking about views. On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 5:07:39 PM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:45:16 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: >> >> ​​ >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 PM, john l

Re: A solution to views based on Edward's recent clone work

On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:45:16 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > ​​ > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 PM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> >> I do not think auto collapsing the tree should be default, it can be >> disorienting and ca

A solution to views based on Edward's recent clone work

I feel very strongly about this and so started a new topic, firstly from a recent post : On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 7:12:52 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > ... > It's hard to imagine anything simpler. *Important*: the

Re: A different way to "show invisibles"

BTW, the new invisibles look great! Really awesome Edward. On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:37:02 AM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote: > > So if I see an existing trace in the source code I just need to set it to > True temporarily? > > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:20:15 AM UTC-5, Edwar

Re: A different way to "show invisibles"

On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:20:15 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:21 AM, john lunzer <lun...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> One question, I see tests for traces all over in the code. You said >> several times "traces show"

Re: A different way to "show invisibles"

One question, I see tests for traces all over in the code. You said several times "traces show". How do I use these traces? They sound useful! On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 12:31:32 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > ​​On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:25 AM, john lunzer <lun...@g

Use case for clones/views/attributes

I want to view a class's "full" definition including all the methods from its parent class in a unified format. I think this *could* be done using clones as it would involve putting nodes from different parents in the same sub-tree, but seems like it would be a big effort to get there. I'm

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >