Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor < leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote: > the easiest way to > ​ [associate icons with attributes] might be the (unfortunately named) > "tree declutter patterns" > ​Thanks for the reminder. I had forgotten​ ​all about this.​ The code

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-17 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
From: Edward K. Ream <edream...@gmail.com> To: leo-editor <leo-editor@googlegroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:31 AM Subject: Re: Attributes vs. Relationships ​​[snip] I would like to see a general user interface that would associate icons with attribut

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
​​ ​​On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Largo84 wrote: > > It would be really cool to better expose the uA's and make them truly > useful. However, I see them as merely metadata (like tags in media files). > What would also be useful is to describe in some meaningful way the >

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-17 Thread Largo84
> not really the same, phew ;-) > > > > > > I'm not sure how tractable the API is for using backlinks in > > > scripts, there's some support I think, and of course more can be > > > added if there's demand. > > > > > > Cheers -T

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-16 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
e's demand. > > > > Cheers -Terry > > > > -- > > *From:* Largo84 <lar...@gmail.com > > > *To:* leo-editor <leo-e...@googlegroups.com > > > *Cc:* terry_...@yahoo.com > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 16, 2016 3:36 PM

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-16 Thread Largo84
how tractable the API is for using backlinks in scripts, > there's some support I think, and of course more can be added if there's > demand. > > Cheers -Terry > > -- > *From:* Largo84 <lar...@gmail.com > > *To:* leo-editor <leo-e...@goo

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-16 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
ractable the API is for using backlinks in scripts, there's some support I think, and of course more can be added if there's demand. Cheers -Terry From: Largo84 <larg...@gmail.com> To: leo-editor <leo-editor@googlegroups.com> Cc: terry_n_br...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, Februa

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-16 Thread Largo84
t; evolve into "using nodes > to describe connections" in the past. > > Cheers -Terry > > > -- > *From:* Largo84 <lar...@gmail.com > > *To:* leo-editor <leo-e...@googlegroups.com > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:

Re: Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-16 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
argo84 <larg...@gmail.com> To: leo-editor <leo-editor@googlegroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:35 PM Subject: Attributes vs. Relationships I'm following with much interest the recent discussions on data structures and possible new directions for Leo. Sorry in advance

Attributes vs. Relationships

2016-02-16 Thread Largo84
I'm following with much interest the recent discussions on data structures and possible new directions for Leo. Sorry in advance if this new post hashes old ground, but it seemed to be somewhat of a different approach (or question). It would be really cool to better expose the uA's and make