On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think 'close enough' requires that at least the
documentation match the behavior, otherwise
there's potential for wasting a lot of time trying
to figure out what is going on.
I agree. Is there a mismatch at present?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think 'close enough' requires that at least the
documentation match the behavior, otherwise
there's potential for wasting a lot of time trying
to
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought Leo obeyed this simple rule:
- the last setting read is used (plugins are a bit special)
Is this true?
True.
If so, all possible permutation and combinations is strictly a matter of
which files are read,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:53:15 -0500
Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The path to clarity is to voluntarily limit your choices: pick *one*
place (home/.leo) for your myLeoSettings.leo file, and *one* place
(leo/config) for your leoSettings.leo file.
Yes but :-)
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:53:15 -0500
Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The path to clarity is to voluntarily limit your choices: pick *one*
place (home/.leo) for your myLeoSettings.leo file, and *one* place
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:53:15 -0500
Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The path to clarity is to voluntarily limit your choices: pick *one*
Just a recap.
given the following myLeoSettings.leo files:
home/.leo/myLeoSettings.leo
home/myLeoSettings.leo
cwd/.leo/myLeoSettings.leo
cwd/myLeoSettings.leo
I get the following:
reading settings in /home/ktenney/src/leo-editor/leo/config/leoSettings.leo
reading settings in
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a recap.
given the following myLeoSettings.leo files:
home/.leo/myLeoSettings.leo
home/myLeoSettings.leo
cwd/.leo/myLeoSettings.leo
cwd/myLeoSettings.leo
I get the following:
reading settings in
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a recap.
given the following myLeoSettings.leo files:
home/.leo/myLeoSettings.leo
home/myLeoSettings.leo
cwd/.leo/myLeoSettings.leo
On Aug 16, 12:39 pm, Alia K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for the following unix-like structure for per user leo settings:
$HOME/.leo
leoID.txt
myLeoSettings.leo
etc..
rev 891 now uses this directory structure for all files that were
formerly in the $HOME directory. Leo will
On Aug 16, 12:14 pm, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imo, Leo 4.5 b4 should attempt to handle settings in a more standard
manner.
The first config changes are at rev 883 of the trunk.
Leo now handle's @enabled-plugins nodes in a more straightforward
manner: it enables all plugins
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Randy Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, brevity is a virtue, but this is too brief. If you have
objections please state them clearly.
Sorry!
No problem. Just remember that I get many emails every day on many
subjects. Please always quote a previous
On Thursday 21 August 2008 07:32 am, Edward K. Ream wrote:
To have any chance of convincing me, you would have to show why the
different approach is a) better than Leo's already flexible
configuration way and b) worth the trouble to implement.
Edward,
Thanks for offering that opportunity,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Especially now that Leo has shadow files, I think people will be
unsurprised to see Leo config and private in company like:
ls -a
.leo
.bzr
.svn
On Thursday 21 August 2008 08:20 am, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To have any chance of convincing me, you would have to show why the
different approach is a) better than Leo's already flexible
configuration way and b)
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Randy Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a little off the current point, but if someone is going to reconsider
where settings and data will reside, you may want to look into the XDG Base
Directory Specification
I think we have enough good ideas for now
On Aug 16, 12:14 pm, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imo, Leo 4.5 b4 should attempt to handle settings in a more standard
manner.
Many thanks to all who have offered suggestions and comments. The
following post summarizes my present plans.
1. Everyone seems agree that the following
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) will just cause more confusion, and 2) just delays the day of
transition to a time when we've all forgotten the issues
involved :-) Imo, the thing to do is simply to make the transition
*now*, and get the
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 10:46 am, Edward K. Ream wrote:
1. Everyone seems agree that the following structure for settings
^Almost
Just for the record ;-)
Randy Kramer
--
I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video
instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al.
On Aug 20, 10:31 am, Randy Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Everyone seems agree that the following structure for settings
^Almost
True, brevity is a virtue, but this is too brief. If you have
objections please state them clearly.
Edward
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) will just cause more confusion, and 2) just delays the day of
transition to a time when we've all forgotten the issues
involved :-)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Especially now that Leo has shadow files, I think people will be
unsurprised to see Leo config and private in company like:
ls -a
.leo
.bzr
.svn
.vim
.cvs
Oh good :-)
Edward
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 12:16 pm, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Aug 20, 10:31 am, Randy Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Everyone seems agree that the following structure for settings
^Almost
True, brevity is a virtue, but this is too brief. If you have
objections please state
23 matches
Mail list logo
