On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:57 PM, HansBKK hans...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies if resurrecting old threads is frowned upon here, if so
let me know and I'll try to refrain in future. . .
For what it's worth, I've seen more resurrections on this mailing list
than any other I participate in. It's
My apologies if resurrecting old threads is frowned upon here, if so
let me know and I'll try to refrain in future. . .
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, mdb mdbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote for using rst2pdf
Thanks for your vote. I'm leaning the same way. I think using
standard tools
From: HansBKK hans...@gmail.com
Or alternatively, does anyone know of a generalized helper utility for
this that would work outside of Leo to:
- watch a dirstruc hierarchy
- track the timestamps of the source files
- run an arbitrary script/executable against and any new or changed
**wow** that was quick! I'll start googling, below only for those with
extra time on their hands 8-)
I've only heard of make in relation to compiling program code from source,
but I'll checking it out for this type of usage - links to starting-point
howtos for non-programmers would be greatly
From: HansBKK hans...@gmail.com
Re using make to update outputs as needed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
: Monday, December 5, 2011 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: import error for leo_pdf
**wow** that was quick! I'll start googling, below only for those with extra
time on their hands 8-)
I've only heard of make in relation to compiling program code from source, but
I'll checking it out for this type of usage
Sorry Terry I believe your response got mangled?
Make looks like the tool for what I want, just a bit of an overly steep
learning curve for what I'm trying to do, but that'll come in handy next
time I'm looking to avoid getting real work done 8-) If I haven't come
across a user-friendlier tool
On 11/08/11 11:33, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, mdbmdbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comments please.
I vote for using rst2pdf
Thanks for your vote. I'm leaning the same way. I think using
standard tools wherever possible is a big improvements over hacks like
On Nov 7, 3:56 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
Sorry, but trying anything newer will have to wait - no time at the
moment.
No rush. leo_pdf probably works as well now as it ever has. Not sure
how many people
Your comments please.
I vote for using rst2pdf
This looks similar to using latexpdf
and the option to convert rst to latex as
another step remains possible
(to leverage latex's abilities)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To post
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, mdb mdbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comments please.
I vote for using rst2pdf
Thanks for your vote. I'm leaning the same way. I think using
standard tools wherever possible is a big improvements over hacks like
leo_pdf.py.
This looks similar to using
with rev 4747 I get:
Unexpected docutils exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/dalcolmo/programs/leo-editor/leo/core/leoRst.py, line
1906, in writeToDocutils
settings_overrides=overrides)
File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/docutils/core.py, line 398, in
publish_string
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
with rev 4747 I get:
[snip]
line 1108, in createParagraph
style = self.styleSheet.get(style)
AttributeError: StyleSheet1 instance has no attribute 'get'
Thanks for this report. I'll fix this today, and (presumably) add a unit
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
with rev 4747 I get:
[snip]
line 1108, in createParagraph
style = self.styleSheet.get(style)
AttributeError: StyleSheet1 instance has no attribute 'get'
My system is Ubuntu 10.04 LTS:
python 2.6.5
python-reportlab 2.4-1
python-reportlab-accel 2.4-1
- Josef
On Nov 7, 8:39 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Josef
On Nov 7, 10:09 pm, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
My system is Ubuntu 10.04 LTS:
python 2.6.5
python-reportlab 2.4-1
python-reportlab-accel 2.4-1
Sorry, but trying anything newer will have to wait - no time at the
moment.
- Josef
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
Sorry, but trying anything newer will have to wait - no time at the
moment.
No rush. leo_pdf probably works as well now as it ever has. Not sure
how many people actually use it.
EKR
--
You received this message because you are
On Nov 6, 2:44 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
get_language takes 2 arguments in the version of docutils I am using. I
suppose the code is going to have to try it both ways...I'll fix this soon.
Done
Fixed on the trunk at rev 4720. I had forgotten I was responsible
I just pulled rev 4739 and I get now:
Unexpected docutils exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/dalcolmo/programs/leo-editor/leo/core/leoRst.py, line
1906, in writeToDocutils
settings_overrides=overrides)
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
Fixed on the trunk at rev 4720. I had forgotten I was responsible
I just pulled rev 4739 and I get now:
docutils.languages.get_language(doctree.settings.language_code,self.reporter)
TypeError: get_language() takes exactly 1
Warning, I am still using plain old Leo-4.9
when I try to run the rst3 command on a line like: @rst foo.pdf I
get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/dalcolmo/programs/Leo-4.9-final/leo/core/leoRst.py,
line 1891, in writeToDocutils
settings_overrides=overrides)
File
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
Warning, I am still using plain old Leo-4.9
when I try to run the rst3 command on a line like: @rst foo.pdf I
get:
Happens with the present code as well. I'll investigate soon.
Edward
--
You received this message because you
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Josef joe...@gmx.net wrote:
when I try to run the rst3 command on a line like: @rst foo.pdf I get:
Happens with the present code as well. I'll investigate soon.
Fixed on the trunk at
23 matches
Mail list logo
