Re: Summarizing recent settings/theme discussions

2018-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 12:00:41 PM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: I shall not approve using css settings that: > > A. can not easily be understood or explained. > B. modify the fundamental colors of a theme. > Terry points out that this is a developer preference. This is great news, because

Re: Summarizing recent settings/theme discussions

2018-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Terry Brown wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:00:40 -0800 (PST) > "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > > > 5. They are settings that do not conflict with the theme's primary > > purpose. In particular, they do not alter the theme's basic colors. > > I don't think this merits a

Re: Summarizing recent settings/theme discussions

2018-03-06 Thread Terry Brown
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:00:40 -0800 (PST) "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > 5. They are settings that do not conflict with the theme's primary > purpose. In particular, they do not alter the theme's basic colors. I don't think this merits argument because it's just a preference of the theme designer. If

Summarizing recent settings/theme discussions

2018-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
Terry is focused on flexibility. That's a good thing. I am focused on simple css. That's also a good thing. This post summarizes the points on which we agree, and issues an edict about what I am willing to do. *Useful settings* Terry and I agree that *some* settings should appear in the css.