On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 12:00:41 PM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote:
I shall not approve using css settings that:
>
> A. can not easily be understood or explained.
> B. modify the fundamental colors of a theme.
>
Terry points out that this is a developer preference. This is great news,
because
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Terry Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:00:40 -0800 (PST)
> "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
>
> > 5. They are settings that do not conflict with the theme's primary
> > purpose. In particular, they do not alter the theme's basic colors.
>
> I don't think this merits a
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:00:40 -0800 (PST)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> 5. They are settings that do not conflict with the theme's primary
> purpose. In particular, they do not alter the theme's basic colors.
I don't think this merits argument because it's just a preference of
the theme designer. If
Terry is focused on flexibility. That's a good thing. I am focused on
simple css. That's also a good thing.
This post summarizes the points on which we agree, and issues an edict
about what I am willing to do.
*Useful settings*
Terry and I agree that *some* settings should appear in the css.
