Re: [lfs-chat] A GNU distro
On 7/14/2016 6:24 AM, Daniel Bernhardt wrote: While LFS is a complex problem, it isn't all that complex in the long run. [snip] But it was tedious[poor word] enough to keep me from doing it. Just reading its references was worthwhile in itself. I have found that even the most robust distributions can be installed in very compact ways. Debian, for example, has the debootstrap method which installs a mere skeleton of the distribution which can then be added to according to your own choices. Any recommended tutorials for a computer _user_ since the 60's, but new to Linux? There is also the "standard" installation (console mode), as well as light-weight and heavier weight desktops. So, as always the choices remain yours. This is the freedom Linux offers. AGREED. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-chat] Reporting a broken link?
Done. On 02/26/2017 07:05 AM, Rafał -rsm- Marek wrote: hi richard, On 26.02.2017 12:07, Richard Owlett wrote: I don't use LFS but have found its documentation valuable. I was reading http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/initramfs.html In the section titled "Using an initramfs" there is a link to http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/initramfs which gives a "page not found error". How/where do I report it? TIA since it's blfs i suggest blfs-supp...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org list. thanks, rsm -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-chat] Reporting a broken link?
I don't use LFS but have found its documentation valuable. I was reading http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/initramfs.html In the section titled "Using an initramfs" there is a link to http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/initramfs which gives a "page not found error". How/where do I report it? TIA -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-chat] Wireless home LAN - WiFi vs Bluetooth?
On 07/29/2019 11:47 AM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:30:32 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
I've just begun reading - primarily Wikipedia articles and some links
from them. My primary question is "What should I be reading?" in
order to ask appropriate questions. Specifically "What?" and "Why?"
much more than "Howto?".
The primary difference between Bluetooth and WiFi is on the L2 level
(OSI network model). ... WiFi is a proper network interface, ...
The question of "WiFi or Bluetooth" has become moot. Not all of my
machines have Bluetooth.
The main challenge that I see in your setup is connecting the network
to the outside world.
Not a problem. My immediate project's goal is educational.
My learning style is experimenting. Failures are assumed ;}
My solution is to rigidly isolate test machines from internet.
Reading questions that may help:
How to connect two hosts using Bluetooth that does not require them to
be in a master-slave relationship?
Bluetooth may now be moot. But not having a fixed master-slave
relationship is important. {e.g. the topology/protocol described at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_area_network
which leads to "Wireless ad hoc network" related links starting at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_ad_hoc_network}
How to connect one WiFi interface to multiple networks? (If you find
out, please post the answer here. xD )
I have no idea of how to describe a test case. The above Wikipedia link
may suggest something?
What application-level interfaces will you use to actually *use* the
network? (FTP? Web? 9P2000? NFS? Gopher? gRPC? Whatever Bluetooth uses?)
Long-term - ?
Initially whatever Debian defaults to when intentionally isolated from
the internet.
{I've never installed LFS but have found its documentation and lists
useful because of the fine-grained approach to systems.}
What do I want my "user-interface" to look like? Don't know ;/
The initial motivation for all this was to eliminate "sneaker-net".
I want convenient file sharing between pairs of machines more than among
a collection of machines.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-chat] Tentative solution - was [Wireless home LAN...]
I'll start with a fresh summary.
Sneakernet for file transfer has become annoying.
Ethernet is undesirable in my environment.
My usage will be peer-to-peer.
I run Debian 9.8.
In another forum it was suggested {tongue evidently in cheek ;} that I
might want 40 year old technology --- UUCP.
I've been reading ;} "cu" describes what I envisioned.
https://www.airs.com/ian/uucp-doc/uucp_3.html#SEC21 states in part:
The cu program is used to call up another system and act as
a dial in terminal. It can also do simple file transfers with
no error checking.
It says "dial in terminal". If I read the documentation,
[https://www.airs.com/ian/uucp-doc/uucp_6.html#SEC79]
correctly, that should be no problem. The documentation explicitly notes
security issues. For my _initial_ usage that should not be an issue.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-chat] Wireless home LAN - WiFi vs Bluetooth?
On 07/29/2019 11:47 AM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:30:32 -0500 Richard Owlett wrote: I've just begun reading - primarily Wikipedia articles and some links from them. My primary question is "What should I be reading?" in order to ask appropriate questions. Specifically "What?" and "Why?" much more than "Howto?". The primary difference between Bluetooth and WiFi ... Bluetooth option has been eliminated as I've discovered a 2nd machine in my collection does not have it. The main challenge that I see in your setup is connecting the network to the outside world. [snip] That is a non-issue as I connect to the internet via a T-Mobile Hotspot (a USB device) used as a "cell modem). If I want internet on one of my secondary machines (an atypical case) I'll just plug it into that machine. Reading questions that may help: How to connect two hosts using Bluetooth that does not require them to be in a master-slave relationship? Moot as Bluetooth is no longer an option. How to connect one WiFi interface to multiple networks? (If you find out, please post the answer here. xD ) That was not in my plans as the combination of WiFi AND being internet connected I consider a NO-NO for my primary machine. But some diagnostics which have been suggested would best be done on machines with nothing but a minimal Debian install. I've two used laptops purchased specifically for experimentation. We'll see what develops. Encryption on Bluetooth? How to route L3 traffic (IP network) over Bluetooth? (This question assumes you *want* to spread an Intranet over your machines.) Not sure how to answer. What I envision would be any two machines communicating as peers. What application-level interfaces will you use to actually *use* the network? (FTP? Web? 9P2000? NFS? Gopher? gRPC? Whatever Bluetooth uses?) I don't know. All I know at this point is I want to avoid any fixed client/server or master/slave relationship. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-chat] Wireless home LAN - WiFi vs Bluetooth?
This is not LFS specific. But I've post to a LUG and a distro specific mailing list. No responses even touched on the my *EXPLICIT* question -- What should I be reading. Responders insist I should want what their identical setup. G ;< Sneakernet for file transfer has become annoying. Ethernet is undesirable in my environment so I am only interested in wireless. I have only a few machines a max of 6' apart. My usage would typically be peer-to-peer but I want to communicate between any two machines. My web connectivity is via a T-Mobile WiFi Hotspot (WiFi turned off). I run Debian 9.8. I've just begun reading - primarily Wikipedia articles and some links from them. My primary question is "What should I be reading?" in order to ask appropriate questions. Specifically "What?" and "Why?" much more than "Howto?". A concern is security issues. Bluetooth, being short range, may thus have an advantage. Speed is not an issue for my expected usage. (I was one of my ISP's last 6 dial-up clients ;) UPDATE: Since originally posting the above, I'm focusing more on a WiFi than Bluetooth solution. Although I did find a Bluetooth article which gave a reasonably good description the topology/protocol I envisioned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_area_network says in part: A Bluetooth WPAN is also called a piconet, and is composed of up to 8 active devices in a master-slave relationship (a very large number of additional devices can be connected in "parked" > mode). The first Bluetooth device in the piconet is the master, and all ther devices are slaves that communicate with the master. TIA -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-chat] Wireless home LAN - WiFi vs Bluetooth?
On 07/29/2019 10:21 AM, Andy Bennett wrote:
Hi,
This is not LFS specific. But I've post to a LUG and a distro specific
mailing list. No responses even touched on the my *EXPLICIT* question
-- What should I be reading. Responders insist I should want what
their identical setup. G ;<
Sneakernet for file transfer has become annoying.
Ethernet is undesirable in my environment so I am only interested in
wireless.
I have only a few machines a max of 6' apart.
My usage would typically be peer-to-peer but I want to communicate
between any two machines.
My web connectivity is via a T-Mobile WiFi Hotspot (WiFi turned off).
I run Debian 9.8.
Can you use the hotspot as an access point? Often they work for a
handful of clients. If so, just use that and connect all the machines
via Wifi.
It's poorly documented. I suspect it is intended to connect any WiFi
equipped machine to the internet. I've seen no indication of capability
of communication among machine ;{
Thanks.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
