question: about upgrade gateway?
After setup Bios (Boot for Lan)
Programs..fail all Show...
You should not be reading this error message. It means
that an unforseen error took place in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S40chkinst,
which exited with a return value of 255
If you're able to track this error
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm planning on merging the gcc4 branch to trunk sometime between
19:00-22:00 UTC on Friday evening.
Trunk is now on gcc-4.0.1, and is open once again! Thanks to all who
helped test the new compiler out, reported bugs and supplied fixes
and/or patches for
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Here's a current list of packages known to compile using GCC-4. The
list is updated as I go (automated). Build scripts for any of the
packages you see on this list are available upon request.
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 09/09/05 16:22 CST:
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 09/09/05 15:49 CDT:
A few additions:
gnome
gnome-vfs-2.10.1
I just noticed that you built GNOME-2.10, whereas I am building
GNOME-2.12.
Not sure if this should make a difference with the error I'm
Hello!
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:47:57AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
BLFS book? Is it necessary to provide a more detailed installation
instruction on how the TeX-system is organized (it is not TeX From
Scratch after all ;-)), hence to motivate why things are done in the way
they are
On 9/9/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/09/05 16:52 CST:
Yeah, ask the GNOME devs to get with the picture and support iNotify :)
If #include limits.h works around the problem, I'd just use that
to be honest (assuming it doesn't cause
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/09/05 18:10 CST:
Why fix the header and then revert it back? Other FAM packages (e.g.
KDE) will probably have the same compliation error. If the fix is
technically correct, just fix it during fam.
KDE has no issues with building as it is. What if a dev
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 09/09/05 18:15 CST:
You mean they would overwrite an existing libfam and fam.h from
the FAM package? Not that it really matters (I did read up on it),
but I didn't really think it was prudent for devs to use the same
names for files that have already been
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/09/05 18:27 CST:
It is supposed to be a replacement for fam,
Tushar, I'm busy with the GCC-4 work right now. Could you write an
RFC (using a new subject thread) to suggest this package as a
replacement for FAM? It would be easy enough for me to shut down
Hi all,
Are we ready to move to the new GTK/Glib/Cairo/Pango/ATK stuff. I
see that David has the GTK+ and Glib bugs spoken for, but I'll be
adding Cairo to the book this weekend, and was wondering what the
community thinks about moving forward.
I'd like to get the GNOME stuff updated and it
Randy McMurchy wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/28/05 23:57 CST:
Basically, the symptom is that text consoles are screwed up after
starting X, and in some cases (Trident Cyber*) a completely white x
display. To reproduce, 'startx' and then 'Ctrl+Alt+F1' and see if the
usual text shows
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 06:40:57PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
Are we ready to move to the new GTK/Glib/Cairo/Pango/ATK stuff. I
see that David has the GTK+ and Glib bugs spoken for, but I'll be
adding Cairo to the book this weekend, and was wondering what the
community thinks
In the bug, there is talk of streamlining the device list for what is
used in LFS. (Comment #7) ALSA can probably go now, as I added it into
BLFS to allow for volume restore, but I would like to prepare for
whatever else will be removed/added/changed in the future. Anyone
already have plans for
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 09/09/05 17:10 CDT:
Going through the book adding patches to support GCC-4 I noticed that
I put a patch in the LFS repo (xorg-6.8.2-gcc4_fixes-1.patch) yet I used
that one plus another patch in my recent build. Here's the other one:
Actually, I made a huge
14 matches
Mail list logo
