On 11/12/05, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm gonna go track down some old posts on the purity tests. Also, if
you want to see how Greg does the binary diffing, you can download his
build system and have a look through the shell scripts. There are a
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Stage 2 is done. The second set of logs (from the first alphabetical
build) are in my home dir.
And the last system is built. All the logs are in my homedir. The diff
produced between the logs of the first alpha and the logs of the
alpha_from_alpha are surprisingly
On 11/12/05, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Stage 2 is done. The second set of logs (from the first alphabetical
build) are in my home dir.
And the last system is built. All the logs are in my homedir. The diff
produced between the logs of the first alpha
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Are you just diffing the logs or are you actually doing binary diffs
on the completed systems?
At this point, just diffing the logs. I still have the binaries from
each of the builds, so if we need to I can access any of them and compare.
--
JH
--
On 11/12/05, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Are you just diffing the logs or are you actually doing binary diffs
on the completed systems?
At this point, just diffing the logs. I still have the binaries from
each of the builds, so if we need to I can access
Dan Nicholson wrote:
That's the real test isn't it? I was reading some of Greg's old posts
on ICA, and binary diffing is the real test of purity. Oh yeah, also,
when doing the alpha-from-alpha, are you doing the whole LFS from
scratch with /tools or just rebuilding over the top of the chroot
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
It seems the /usr/bin/autom4te script is looking for m4 in /tools/bin.
m4 needs to be moved up to the beginning.
BTW, /usr/bin/autom4te is just a perl script, so you could edit it
manually to call the right m4. But obviously the better fix is to
Ken Moffat wrote:
I was going to release these scripts a few weeks ago, but issues in my
x86_64-64 results caused me to put them aside. Looks as if they might
be useful for lfs-svn, so play with them if you wish.
Thanks! I will definitely play with them. :)
--
JH
--
Ken Moffat wrote:
I was going to release these scripts a few weeks ago, but issues in my
x86_64-64 results caused me to put them aside. Looks as if they might
be useful for lfs-svn, so play with them if you wish.
I just used farce to diff the binaries from my first build, (the LFS-SVN
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Anyway, the results of the farce run are in my homedir:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/farce-results
A question for Ken, then. What's the difference between:
2 files differed as expected
and
1 files differed as
On 11/12/05, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm gonna go track down some old posts on the purity tests. Also, if
you want to see how Greg does the binary diffing, you can download his
build system and have a look through the shell scripts. There are a
few functions related to ICA
On 11/12/05, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
That's the real test isn't it? I was reading some of Greg's old posts
on ICA, and binary diffing is the real test of purity. Oh yeah, also,
when doing the alpha-from-alpha, are you doing the whole LFS from
Dan Nicholson wrote:
As in:
1. Do Ch.5
2. Do Ch.6, copy to different dir
3. Do Ch.6, diff with other dir
Or:
1. Do Ch.5
2. Do Ch.6, copy to different dir
3. Do Ch.5
4. Do Ch.6, diff with other dir
Hopefully the first way because the second way would produce exactly
the same thing and doesn't
Chris Staub wrote:
I just found a problem. I tried building arts and got this...
Here's another uncleanness:
e2fsprogs and libtool hardcode the path of sed into installed scripts.
/usr/bin/mk_cmds (from e2fsprogs) and /usr/bin/libtool both have
/tools/bin/sed as hard-coded as the command
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
I just found a problem. I tried building arts and got this...
Here's another uncleanness:
e2fsprogs and libtool hardcode the path of sed into installed scripts.
/usr/bin/mk_cmds (from e2fsprogs) and /usr/bin/libtool both have
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Ken Moffat wrote:
Heh, I was just about to revisit your earlier posting and ask about libtool.
The difference in bison might be worrying, or it might be nothing (maybe even
another candidate for differs as they usually do) - anything interesting in
farce-extras, or is
Ken Moffat wrote:
differences, both from fcron jobs). OTOH, if you do run it on a live
system and it trashes it, that's a bug ;)
Heh, of course, ;) I meant to tell you that it's a nice and useful bit
of script. Thanks again.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm gonna go track down some old posts on the purity tests. Also, if
you want to see how Greg does the binary diffing, you can download his
build system and have a look through the shell scripts. There are a
few functions related to ICA that basically make up the crux of
Hey Guys,
Just a heads up.
I've got the necessary changes made in the new alphabetical branch.
There's a rendered version in my home dir on the LFS server, in case
anyone else would like to generally follow it:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/
Also there is the logs from my build of
David Fix wrote:
I've got the necessary changes made in the new alphabetical branch.
Quick question... :P What's the alphabetical branch? :)
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hey Guys,
Just a heads up.
Stage 2 is done. The second set of logs (from the first alphabetical
build) are in my home dir.
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
21 matches
Mail list logo
