[snip]
Though undesirable, this is actually ok the first 300 or so times that
it happens, but it does eventually lead to a recursive loop.
[/snip]
From past experience (this weekend), a second build with chapter 6 of
glibc with gcc-7-branch svn checout and binutils 2.29 git checkout did
lead to
On August 9, 2017 6:51:44 AM CDT, Wayne Blaszczyk
wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:15 +0200, Thierry Nuttens wrote:
>> 2017-08-09 7:00 GMT+02:00 Bruce Dubbs :
>> > Ken Moffat wrote:
>> >
>> > > ĸen, beginning to think building from scratch is
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:15 +0200, Thierry Nuttens wrote:
> 2017-08-09 7:00 GMT+02:00 Bruce Dubbs :
> > Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > > ĸen, beginning to think building from scratch is coming to an end,
> > > except when we can match random git/svn versions of everything.
> >
2017-08-09 7:00 GMT+02:00 Bruce Dubbs :
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> ĸen, beginning to think building from scratch is coming to an end,
>> except when we can match random git/svn versions of everything.
>
>
> Don't get discouraged yet. I have seen reports of success with some
>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 11:30:35AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> :)
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-08/msg00082.html
>
Yeah, I saw that. So I thought I would try building glibc-2.26 with
gcc-2.26, and (of course) it failed the same way. Which prompts me
to ask:
(i) what versions of gcc are
Ok. Will test a build of LFS svn with it next monday along with
binutils 2.29 and glibc-2.26.
I might use a Xenomai / i-pipe patched latest kernel possible (4.9.24
last time I looked) instead of 4.12.whatever.
I got two project needing realtime capabilities in the coming months.
Alain
:)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-08/msg00082.html
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page