Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-17 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:28:47PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > > Any more thoughts on tagging or gcc-8.1 ? The gimp-2.10.2 release > > is expected shortly, so I figured I want a fresh system to try it > > on. Currently building last night's books, but on my slowest > > current machine. >

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 05/17/2018 05:15 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 11:46:25PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 04:43:49PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: With the gcc update, I plan to do a full BLFS build starting next weekend. We may want to tag packages in BLFS as gcc-8 compatible

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-17 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 11:46:25PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 04:43:49PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > With the gcc update, I plan to do a full BLFS build starting next weekend. > > We may want to tag packages in BLFS as gcc-8 compatible as we build/test > > them.

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-06 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 01:36:05AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > For the dependencies - I've been using releases/pre-releases > intermittently since 2.9.6 so I knew of them. One thing you might > have missed is a snafu in gimp-2.0.pc : it claims to require > gegl-0.3 >= 0.4.0 (sed or a manual

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 01:20:19AM +0200, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote: > Hi all, > > wasn't confident enough to post it before, but as an answer I'm fine with > it: > > On Sat, 5 May 2018, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > I've got too much on at the moment to think about starting gcc-8 > > testing. >

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-05 Thread dueffert
Hi all, wasn't confident enough to post it before, but as an answer I'm fine with it: On Sat, 5 May 2018, Ken Moffat wrote: I've got too much on at the moment to think about starting gcc-8 testing. gcc-8.1 was a "silent" update here. No issues seen so far, not tested properly either,

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 04:43:49PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > With the gcc update, I plan to do a full BLFS build starting next weekend. > We may want to tag packages in BLFS as gcc-8 compatible as we build/test > them. Feedback requested. > I've got too much on at the moment to think about

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-05 Thread DJ Lucas
On May 5, 2018 4:43:49 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >I've updated the LFS book with the following: > >Update to gcc-8.1.0. >Update to linux-4.16.7. >Update to man-pages-4.16. >Update to meson-0.46.0. >Update to shadow-4.6. >Update to tzdata-2018e. >Update to xz-5.2.4. > >It

[lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

2018-05-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I've updated the LFS book with the following: Update to gcc-8.1.0. Update to linux-4.16.7. Update to man-pages-4.16. Update to meson-0.46.0. Update to shadow-4.6. Update to tzdata-2018e. Update to xz-5.2.4. It required a sed for libelf that I derived from the patch DJ posted in the patches