On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:24:53AM -0700, Trent Shea wrote:
It really depends on how you build your kernel; hd* is still valid,
as far as I'm aware.
That's not my experience. My /dev/hd* devices disappeared when I
upgraded 2.6.27 to 2.6.28 and I have no /dev/sr* or new /dev/sd*
What is the brand and model of the motherboard you are trying to use to
boot this LFS system?
It's rare but occasionally you need to compile some less than obvious
drivers into the kernel to make the system boot properly.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
su.sinnes wrote:
What is the brand and model of the motherboard you are trying to use
to
boot this LFS system?
I am using vmware
Which file system are you using?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Ken Moffat wrote:
OK, I had another look at the gnash list archives. Looks as if
this came up earlier -
.http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnash-dev/2009-10/msg00093.html
Summary:
add the flashblock extension (this means you have to start
each flash video, which is probably a good thing
Which file system are you using?
/dev/sda1 on /mnt/lfs type ext3 (rw)
Thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
su.sinnes wrote:
I put an * on everything with, SATA, and all filesystems, and a lot of
other things for this recompilation.
and i changed file under /boot/grub/device.map
(hd0) /dev/sda
to
(sd0) /dev/sda
then ran grub-mkconfig -o /boot/boot/grub/grub.cfg
again.
do you think its
linux fan wrote:
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
linux fan wrote:
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Have you tried booting into memtest86+
and checking your memory?
Thanks for that!
Eliminated one memory bank at a time until it didn't fail before test #5.
Rolled back to textinfo-ch5.
On 11/24/09, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 18:29 -0600, al...@verizon.net wrote:
The last thing is to start a flame here; I still see a
need for floppies on Linux
Agree there is a need for floppies.
I just used a floppy to boot memtest86+ which found a bad
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd start over. Having a suspect base is not a good idea. Try jhalfs
to automate the build.
Yes jhalfs has been working for me.
Starting over from mke2fs.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
linux fan wrote:
On 11/24/09, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 18:29 -0600, al...@verizon.net wrote:
The last thing is to start a flame here; I still see a
need for floppies on Linux
Agree there is a need for floppies.
I just used a floppy to boot memtest86+
2009/11/24 linux fan linuxscra...@gmail.com:
On 11/24/09, Jeremy Henty onepo...@starurchin.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:24:53AM -0700, Trent Shea wrote:
It really depends on how you build your kernel; hd* is still valid,
as far as I'm aware.
That's not my experience. My
Am Dienstag 24 November 2009 17:36:32 schrieb linux fan:
As far as I am aware, greub always did, always will, call them hd.
I also think so.
To be exact, it calls them hd when it means in grub-speak (hd0,
and they can be called sd when it means in real-speak /dev/sda (if it is
sata) So you
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That works for you, but for most people, it's far easier to use a usb
thumb drive with capacities in GB to do the same thing.
I know that it is impossible to believe, but I have yet to purchase my
first usb thumb drive.
--
On 11/24/09, Ken Moffat wrote:
The names of the devices in grub and within linux are two separate
things. For an explanation of why /dev/hdX becomes /dev/sdX
see Simon's response to another thread.
/dev/hdX (from the old IDE drivers) is now regarded as legacy, except
for old ppc
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If you are getting a kernel panic, it's not grub. Grub did it's job and
loaded the kernel, then the kernel had a problem.
Agree.
But, there are 2 places that cause kernel panic:
1) grub's kernel/linux line, the root=/dev/[is_incorrect] parameter
2) fstab's:
linux fan wrote:
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That works for you, but for most people, it's far easier to use a usb
thumb drive with capacities in GB to do the same thing.
I know that it is impossible to believe, but I have yet to purchase my
first usb thumb drive.
I don't know where
Le Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:23:03 -0500,
stosss sto...@gmail.com a écrit :
Why does LFS stay so far ahead of BLFS? What is the point of building
the newest LFS if the BLFS files are older and probably won't work or
would be replacing newer versions of apps with older versions?
There is a note on
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I don't know where you live, but I've seen them given away as
promotions. Otherwise they are very common at $10 or less.
Some day, I might get one.
I don't care what udev does as long as it doesn't cause problems.
I've got the 16 fd things in dev and was never
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:10 PM, linux fan linuxscra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/24/09, Ken Moffat wrote:
The names of the devices in grub and within linux are two separate
things. For an explanation of why /dev/hdX becomes /dev/sdX
see Simon's response to another thread.
If the kernel is
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:10 PM, linux fan linuxscra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/24/09, Ken Moffat wrote:
The names of the devices in grub and within linux are two separate
things. For an explanation of why /dev/hdX becomes /dev/sdX
see Simon's response to another thread.
If the kernel is
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:10 PM, linux fan linuxscra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/24/09, Ken Moffat wrote:
The names of the devices in grub and within linux are two separate
things. For an explanation of why /dev/hdX becomes /dev/sdX
see Simon's response to another thread.
If the kernel is
Hello Simon Linux Fan,
The thread started as a complaint about UDEV
eliminating the only workaround, last_rule,
I could use to avoid the pollution of the
/dev with a relatively large number of
nonsensical floppy nodes (from my standpoint),
which was followed by a pleading for help.
It's taken
On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
linux fan wrote:
Intending to umount and roll back, I get:
df -ha
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda11 11G 7.6G 2.7G 74% /
/proc0 0 0 - /proc
sysfs0 0 0
23 matches
Mail list logo
