Re: quot;autoquot; in /etc/fstab

On 10/11/2010 08:39 AM, Neal Murphy wrote: Binutils are getting better at recognizing a filesystem and loading its module(s) as needed before mounting it; it wasn't always thus. Regardless of that, there are two consumers of /etc/fstab: the computer, and the admin; it needs to be computer

auto in /etc/fstab

Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the /etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them all as auto? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: Can't compile hsfmodem driver in LFS 6.6.

They are suggesting that your compiler/assembler/linker tool chain may have a fault, I think. I checked the messages during my build carefully and believe all were correct. Is there a post-build test? You'd need to ask them what they want. Unfortunately it's a Catch-22. They

Re: Can't compile hsfmodem driver in LFS 6.6.

I checked the messages during my build carefully and believe all were correct. Is there a post-build test? Apparently, yes. You try to build hsfmodem driver :-) Indeed, but as the problem may be with their driver package ... Is there a test to isolate/eliminate the problem.

Can't compile hsfmodem driver in LFS 6.6.

Greetings, I'm unable to compile an hsfmodem in LFS 6.6. I realize a modem isn't exactly a state-of-the-art internet connection, but I do use my modem occasionally and the problem bugs me. The problem is I can compile the modem driver in LFS 6.3 with the 2.6.26 kernel but can't compile the

Re: Is it supported if I want to create a non-standard file structure?

On 04/15/2010 07:26 PM, Jordan Peters wrote: I'm going through the LFS 6.6 book with ubuntu 9.10 as the host and I'm wondering if there are any tutorials anywhere to help if I want to try creating a custom filesystem setup. Like having /apps instead of /bin, /users instead of /home,

Re: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5 binutils Pass1 Nothing to be done for 'install-target'

Bruce Dubbs wrote: rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote: I'm attempting to build LFS 6.5 using my LFS 6.3 working build. With binutils Pass1 in Chapter 5 I'm receiving the following: make [2]: Leaving directory '/lfs/sources/binutils-build/libiberty' make [1]: Nothing to be done for

LFS 6.5 Chapter 5 binutils Pass1 Nothing to be done for 'install-target'

I'm attempting to build LFS 6.5 using my LFS 6.3 working build. With binutils Pass1 in Chapter 5 I'm receiving the following: make [2]: Leaving directory '/lfs/sources/binutils-build/libiberty' make [1]: Nothing to be done for 'install-target'. make [1] Leaving directory

Re: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5 Tcl make *** [install-msgs] Error 139

Bruce Dubbs wrote: rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote: I receive make *** [install-msgs] Error 139 when compiling Tcl-8.5.7. I read another user reporting the same error with a suggestion to run memtest. Memtest runs without error. I've compiled LFS for years and am attempting to compile

LFS 6.5 Chapter 5 Tcl make *** [install-msgs] Error 139

I receive make *** [install-msgs] Error 139 when compiling Tcl-8.5.7. I read another user reporting the same error with a suggestion to run memtest. Memtest runs without error. I've compiled LFS for years and am attempting to compile 6.5 using my working 6.3 version. I don't remember a

Re: LFS 6.3 chp 6.12.1

DJ Lucas wrote: Stealth wrote: The book says to run this grep -o '/usr/lib.*/crt[1in].*succeeded' dummy.log and get this /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../crt1.o succeeded /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../crti.o succeeded

Using different kernel/header versions?

Does using a boot kernel older than the kernel source used to generate API headers cause problems? In explanation, I built LFS 6.3 per documentation using the 2.6.22.5 kernel source to generate API headers. Unfortunately, I can't boot to the 2.6.22.5 kernel. However, I can successfully boot

Re: LFS 6.3 gcc output differences (ignoring nonexistent directory) [Solved]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 8, 2008, at 6:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #include ... search starts here: ignoring nonexistent directory /tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux/4.1.2/../../../../i686-pc- linux-gnu/include /usr/local/ include#

Sound 101 questions.

Greetings: I have no sound with LFS 6.0. SuSE 9.2 produces sound and shows an 82440MX AC'97 Audio Controller. I've read the sound archives with no success. I've built the following into the kernel: Sound Card Support Advanced Linux Sound Architecture OSS Mixer API OSS PCM (digital

Re: Sound 101 questions.

Doug Ronne wrote: The most common reason for no sound in my experience is that the alsa mixer defaults to no volume. try running alsamixer, use up arrow to crank up the main volume, hit , to turn it on, and do the same with pcm. -Doug On 8/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Sound 101 questions.

Doug Ronne wrote: On 8/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've built the following into the kernel: Sound Card Support Advanced Linux Sound Architecture OSS Mixer API OSS PCM (digital audio) PCI ATI IXP AC97 Controller Intel/SiS/nVidia/AMD Ali AC97 Controller Open Sound

Re: Sound 101 questions.

Randy McMurchy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 08/15/05 19:08 CST: [from LFS-Support, please direct all replies to BLFS-Support] It was suggested this belongs in BLFS support. I don't want to ignore etiquette and I'll post there in the future. However, as I've received

Time suspend problem.

I have a problem after manually suspending my Thinkpad with [Fn F4]. After resuming, my time is wrong. My /etc/sysconfig/clock file shows UTC=0 and my localtime is set to Chicago. I have no problem with time unless I syspend. This may only be a Thinkpad problem but I've not noticed it