On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:21 +0100, Eric Plummer wrote:
Simon:
That is one heck of an assumption... If you assume everyone else does
their job properly, I have a used car you might be interested in...
Oh, I know it's not necessarily accurate, don't get me wrong. But as I
said, if I don't trust
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:59:47 +1200
Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
And that's fine - I'm not trying to convince everyone else that running
tests is unnecessary. I just don't find it worth my time, running tests
for every piece of software I install.
Same here. If it's broken I'll find
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 12:00 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Interesting. I have more faith in my own code than I do in others'.
You apparently trust others' works more than you do your own.
It's more that I see automated testing as being for the developer's
benefit - so when writing code, it's
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 12:00 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Interesting. I have more faith in my own code than I do in others'.
You apparently trust others' works more than you do your own.
It's more that I see automated testing as being for the developer's
benefit - so when writing code, it's
Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 12:00 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Interesting. I have more faith in my own code than I do in others'.
You apparently trust others' works more than you do your own.
It's more that I see automated testing as being for the developer's
benefit - so when
Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:12 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Webmaster wrote:
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the
check failed you can do nothing.
Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
many a manager say more or less the
Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:12 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Webmaster wrote:
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the
check failed you can do nothing.
Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
many a manager say more or less the
On 06/16/2011 05:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
cannot get beyond this:
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:12 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Webmaster wrote:
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the
check failed you can do nothing.
Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
many a manager say more or less the same thing.
Harsh.
Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:12 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Webmaster wrote:
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the
check failed you can do nothing.
Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
many a manager say more or less the
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the check
failed you can do nothing.
-- Original --
From: robertmullinrob...@gmail.com;
Date: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 00:33 AM
To: lfs-supportlfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org;
Subject:
Webmaster wrote:
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the
check failed you can do nothing.
Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
many a manager say more or less the same thing.
Mac
--
On vr, 2011-06-17 at 22:12 +0800, Webmaster wrote:
I never check, because if the check passed it's useless but if the
check failed you can do nothing.
If the check passed you know you have succeeded thus far, if it failed
you might have made a mistake. I'd rather _know_ something is wrong than
robert wrote:
cannot get beyond this:
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-mqueue5.out]
On 06/16/2011 02:37 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
robert wrote:
cannot get beyond this:
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]:
robert wrote:
cannot get beyond this:
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-mqueue5.out]
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:29:19 -0500
robert mullinrob...@gmail.com wrote:
What additional info should I post?
About 20 lines or so before it _first_ says error.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
17 matches
Mail list logo
