On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:07 AM, William Immendorf wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Mykal Funk wrote:
> > I can say it isn't the hardware. I recompiled the kernel with
> > CONFIG_HZ_100 option set, then rebooted with that kernel. I started the
> > glibc build from 5.7.1 and 12 hours la
To run tests as user 'nobody' in Sec. 6.21.1, I have to change
permissions of the entire directories ./tests, ./gnulib-tests and
./src
chown -Rv nobody ./{tests,gnulib-tests,src}
and not of the {gnulib-tests,lib,src}/.deps as in the book now.
This is an overkill but I did not find bett
On 12/16/2009 12:19 PM, Peter Dunning wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been building an LFS system and I noticed that in 5.9 we recompile
> the linker to look in /usr/lib and /lib for libraries. Does this mean
> the following in 5.10 should produce nothing? (as the executable should
> request the interpreter
On 16/12/09 17:42, William Immendorf wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Peter Dunning
> wrote:
>> I've been building an LFS system and I noticed that in 5.9 we recompile
>> the linker to look in /usr/lib and /lib for libraries. Does this mean
>> the following in 5.10 should produce nothin
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Peter Dunning
wrote:
> I've been building an LFS system and I noticed that in 5.9 we recompile
> the linker to look in /usr/lib and /lib for libraries. Does this mean
> the following in 5.10 should produce nothing? (as the executable should
> request the interpret
Hi,
I've been building an LFS system and I noticed that in 5.9 we recompile
the linker to look in /usr/lib and /lib for libraries. Does this mean
the following in 5.10 should produce nothing? (as the executable should
request the interpreter from /lib or /usr/lib)
echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
cc
On 12/16/09, stosss wrote:
>>> On 12/15/09, Pixel 73 wrote:
>> Thank you very much for your help. What can I do, if I already did 'make
>> install'? How can I uninstall again?
In linux, attempted uninstall risks more harm than good unless you
really know what might break which is usually not the
William Immendorf wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Mykal Funk wrote:
>
>> I can say it isn't the hardware. I recompiled the kernel with
>> CONFIG_HZ_100 option set, then rebooted with that kernel. I started the
>> glibc build from 5.7.1 and 12 hours later under high load the clock is
Mykal Funk wrote:
> I can say it isn't the hardware. I recompiled the kernel with
> CONFIG_HZ_100 option set, then rebooted with that kernel. I started the
I was convinced that was the problem. Congratulations!
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose
Simon Geard wrote:
>
> Can't speak for Knoppix, but no - live CDs often have a read-only root
> filesystem.
I've used several, and never encountered one like what you describe.
They use unionfs, aufs, or something similar.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Mykal Funk wrote:
> I can say it isn't the hardware. I recompiled the kernel with
> CONFIG_HZ_100 option set, then rebooted with that kernel. I started the
> glibc build from 5.7.1 and 12 hours later under high load the clock is
> still accurate. Problem fixed. Th
Johnneylee Rollins wrote:
>
> I'm curious, what are the other computers that you used?
>
> May I take this moment to refocus this? We're supposed to be helping
> him with an issue with his clock.
> Personally I'd try to recreate the problem and create some sort of
> log. I don't know enough t
On Saturday 12 December 2009 04:32:19 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> It's trivial for any user to adjust PATH to search /sbin and /usr/sbin.
I always link /usr to . and /sbin to bin when building LFS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma
>> On 12/15/09, Pixel 73 wrote:
>>
>> > How can I analyze which of my previous steps went wrong?
>>
>> Did the make command really complete without errors?
>>
>> I always try to keep a log containing all the output because the
>> screen scrolls by, and later, I wish I could see the errors that went
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:00:01 -0500
> Subject: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.12, GCC-4.1.2 startfiles check fails --> no
> output
> From: linuxscra...@gmail.com
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
>
> On 12/15/09, Pixel 73 wrote:
>
> > How can I analyze which of my previous steps went wrong?
Jonathan Wilkes schrieb:
> I tried googling for any hints, and checking the archives for this list,
> but I'm new to linux so I'm a bit unsure what I'm searching for. Any hints
> would be greatly appreciated.
As far as I know most LiveCDs should have a read-write-overlay
filesystem. Which mean
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 00:34 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
>> I believe you can install extra stuff while using a livecd - just use
>> whatever its package manager installation commands are (I believe
>> Knoppix is based on Debian so you should just
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 00:34 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> I believe you can install extra stuff while using a livecd - just use
> whatever its package manager installation commands are (I believe
> Knoppix is based on Debian so you should just be able to use apt-get) -
> of course you'd have to in
On 12/15/09 22:34, stosss wrote:
>> uh,I have never use a live cd to build my LFS,it too troublesome! maybe
>> you should install a linux distro . It is much better.
>
> Why do you say that? Just curious, because i used the LFS LiveCD 6.3
> to build my first LFS 6.5 build.
you can use a livecd, j
19 matches
Mail list logo
