Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGhee
Using SVN-20100803 at Chapter 5.2, Glibc-2.11.2. Applying the patch command for glibc-2.11.2-makefile_fix-1.patch failed with No such file or directory. The patch is in the wget-list but I couldn't find it on any of the LFS download sites. Is there another way, about which I have forgotten,

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread William Immendorf
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dan McGhee beesn...@grm.net wrote: The patch is in the wget-list but I couldn't find it on any of the LFS download sites.  Is there another way, about which I have forgotten, to get it? Well, I don't know where the heck the patch came from, so I'll just wait

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On 4 August 2010 17:23, William Immendorf Well, I don't know where the heck the patch came from, so I'll just wait untill Matt gets the patch ready. But we would like it soon, as I'm getting impatient for it... Yeah, I suspect make-3.82 will turn out to be too close to the bleeding edge.

Re: LFS (SVN 20100726) - 6.9 Glibc-2.11.2

2010-08-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On 03/08/10 05:19, Angus Gibson wrote: Hi all, I'm getting a strange build error in glibc: root:/sources/builds/glibc/build# make ..snip.. make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/builds/glibc/src/wctype' make subdir=manual -C manual ..=../ subdir_lib make[2]: Entering directory

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGhee
On 08/04/2010 12:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: Yeah, I suspect make-3.82 will turn out to be too close to the bleeding edge. AFAICS, only Mandriva are using it (not necessarily for glibc, but make-3.82 is in 'cooker') and most of us don't have a clue what needs to be changed. Does this mean that

Re: LFS (SVN 20100726) - 6.9 Glibc-2.11.2

2010-08-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On 04/08/10 18:56, Andrew Benton wrote: On 03/08/10 05:19, Angus Gibson wrote: Hi all, I'm getting a strange build error in glibc: root:/sources/builds/glibc/build# make ..snip.. make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/builds/glibc/src/wctype' make subdir=manual -C manual ..=../

Re: LFS (SVN 20100726) - 6.9 Glibc-2.11.2

2010-08-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On 04/08/10 19:25, Andrew Benton wrote: Slightly more refined version, 2 seds, one after the other: sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n$/' manual/Makefile sed -i '/pot/a\\ttouch $@' manual/Makefile Better still, combine the 2 sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n\ttouch $...@\n$/' manual/Makefile I don't know if it's a

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On 4 August 2010 19:23, Dan McGhee beesn...@grm.net wrote: Does this mean that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily from there?  Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and document failures to the list?  I'm building x86_64 and there was a note on the ticket that glibc built

set help

2010-08-04 Thread korbinian
end -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS (SVN 20100726) - 6.9 Glibc-2.11.2

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGhee
On 08/04/2010 01:42 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: Slightly more refined version, 2 seds, one after the other: sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n$/' manual/Makefile sed -i '/pot/a\\ttouch $@' manual/Makefile Better still, combine the 2 sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n\ttouch $...@\n$/' manual/Makefile

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On 04/08/10 20:42, Ken Moffat wrote: On 4 August 2010 19:23, Dan McGheebeesn...@grm.net wrote: Does this mean that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily from there? Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and document failures to the list? I'm building x86_64 and there was a

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On 4 August 2010 23:46, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/08/10 20:42, Ken Moffat wrote: On 4 August 2010 19:23, Dan McGheebeesn...@grm.net  wrote: Does this mean that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily from there?  Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and

Re: LFS (SVN 20100726) - 6.9 Glibc-2.11.2

2010-08-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On 4 August 2010 23:45, Dan McGhee beesn...@grm.net wrote: On 08/04/2010 01:42 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: Slightly more refined version, 2 seds, one after the other:  sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n$/' manual/Makefile  sed -i '/pot/a\\ttouch $@' manual/Makefile Better still, combine the 2 sed -i

Re: LFS (SVN 20100726) - 6.9 Glibc-2.11.2

2010-08-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On 04/08/10 23:45, Dan McGhee wrote: Andy, just to be clear. You apply this sed command in Chapter 6 and *not* in Chapter 5? I've got make-3.81 installed on my host system, Ubuntu-10.04, I'm building for x86_64 and using LFS-SVN-20100803. Indeed. I didn't apply it in chapter 5 as my host had

Re: LFS (SVN 20100726) - 6.9 Glibc-2.11.2

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGhee
On 08/04/2010 07:38 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: I didn't apply it in chapter 5 as my host had make-3.81. However, next time I build it will be with a host which uses make-3.82, so I will need to apply the sed in chapter 5. At least, until they fix the glibc/manual/Makefile. Got it. Thanks,