gmp
Hi I seem to be stuck at the gmp configure stage ABI=32 ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-cxx --enable-mpbsd checking build system type... core2-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... core2-unknown-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /tools/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /tools/bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking ABI=32 checking compiler gcc -m32 -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer ... no checking compiler gcc -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer ... yes checking compiler gcc -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer has sizeof(long)==4... no checking compiler icc -no-gcc ... no checking whether cc is gcc... yes checking compiler cc -m32 -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer ... no checking compiler cc -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer ... yes checking compiler cc -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer has sizeof(long)==4... no configure: error: could not find a working compiler, see config.log for details Now up til now its has had no problem finding gcc I am in /sources/gmp-5.0.1 directory. This is a x86_64 dual core so I am trying to use the ABI=32 option. I must have something wrong but I don't see what. Any suggestios? I tried deleteing the directory and starting over with this one but got the same thing. If I understand it correctly I need to use the abi=32 env arg config.log Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gmp
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Mike m-jack...@charter.net wrote: I am in /sources/gmp-5.0.1 directory. This is a x86_64 dual core so I am trying to use the ABI=32 option. I must have something wrong but I don't see what. Any suggestios? I tried deleteing the directory and starting over with this one but got the same thing. If I understand it correctly I need to use the abi=32 env arg Your problem is that you are building an Pure64 bit system, and on that system, that arg makes no sense. Remove ABI=32 from configure and run it again. -- William Immendorf The ultimate in free computing. Messages in plain text, please, no HTML. GPG key ID: 1697BE98 If it's not signed, it's not from me. -- Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: tar-1.25 got a tarball file lager than the dir
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:38 AM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote: sorry about my Egnrish ;-) ... what did I tell you about the fact that this thread DOES NOT BELONG ON THIS LIST!!! -- William Immendorf The ultimate in free computing. Messages in plain text, please, no HTML. GPG key ID: 1697BE98 If it's not signed, it's not from me. -- Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: tar-1.25 got a tarball file lager than the dir
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:44 AM, William Immendorf will.immend...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:38 AM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote: sorry about my Egnrish ;-) ... what did I tell you about the fact that this thread DOES NOT BELONG ON THIS LIST!!! Wow, I'm a hypocrite. I was making it clear that this thread does not belong at all on this list. -- William Immendorf The ultimate in free computing. Messages in plain text, please, no HTML. GPG key ID: 1697BE98 If it's not signed, it's not from me. -- Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gmp
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:42 AM, William Immendorf wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Mike m-jack...@charter.net wrote: I am in /sources/gmp-5.0.1 directory. This is a x86_64 dual core so I am trying to use the ABI=32 option. I must have something wrong but I don't see what. Any suggestios? I tried deleteing the directory and starting over with this one but got the same thing. If I understand it correctly I need to use the abi=32 env arg Your problem is that you are building an Pure64 bit system, and on that system, that arg makes no sense. Remove ABI=32 from configure and run it again. -- William Immendorf The ultimate in free computing. Messages in plain text, please, no HTML. GPG key ID: 1697BE98 If it's not signed, it's not from me. -- Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Yes it will compile like that but will it be able to run on pure 32-bit system i.e. not x86-64. If I understood it correctly that option was to make it so it would. Thanks for your reply and help. I started this about a year ago and decided I needed to learn quite a bit more in particular about shell scripting so I left the idea and studied quite a bit. It has been worth it for this alone. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gmp
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:47:33AM -0500, Mike wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:42 AM, William Immendorf wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Mike m-jack...@charter.net wrote: I am in /sources/gmp-5.0.1 directory. This is a x86_64 dual core so I am trying to use the ABI=32 option. I must have something wrong but I don't see what. Any suggestios? I tried deleteing the directory and starting over with this one but got the same thing. If I understand it correctly I need to use the abi=32 env arg Your problem is that you are building an Pure64 bit system, and on that system, that arg makes no sense. Remove ABI=32 from configure and run it again. Yes it will compile like that but will it be able to run on pure 32-bit system i.e. not x86-64. If I understood it correctly that option was to make it so it would. Thanks for your reply and help. I started this about a year ago and decided I needed to learn quite a bit more in particular about shell scripting so I left the idea and studied quite a bit. It has been worth it for this alone. Iff you have built everything up to this point as 32-bit, you should not have a problem specifying ABI=32. It sounds as if you have been building a 64-bit system until you got to gmp. I don't understand why you would care if the completed LFS system will run on a 32-bit processor ? If you wish to build something that you can install onto 32-bit i686 hardware, then build the 32-bit version of the book, but in all honesty we recommend that you build it on the machine on which it will run. And please note that LFS is either 32 or 64 bit - we don't support multilib. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: tar-1.25 got a tarball file lager than the dir
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 07:44 -0600, William Immendorf wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:38 AM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote: sorry about my Egnrish ;-) ... what did I tell you about the fact that this thread DOES NOT BELONG ON THIS LIST!!! No need to be rude about it... the world isn't going to end just because someone asked a question on the wrong mailing list... Simon. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Error in 6.7. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers
Hi All, I'm facing an error in 6.7 linux API headers specifically the step make headers_check I get the following error: CHK include/linux/version.h UPD include/linux/version.h HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep gcc: error trying to exec '/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as': execv: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1 make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 There are a whole lot of previous posts with the exact same error. But a resolution was not posted. I've checked my GCC/Binutils compile logs and they seem to be alright. The sanity tests passed as well. So I've kind of hit a dead end here. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks, Anand -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gmp
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:47:33AM -0500, Mike wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:42 AM, William Immendorf wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Mike m-jack...@charter.net wrote: I am in /sources/gmp-5.0.1 directory. This is a x86_64 dual core so I am trying to use the ABI=32 option. I must have something wrong but I don't see what. Any suggestios? I tried deleteing the directory and starting over with this one but got the same thing. If I understand it correctly I need to use the abi=32 env arg Your problem is that you are building an Pure64 bit system, and on that system, that arg makes no sense. Remove ABI=32 from configure and run it again. Yes it will compile like that but will it be able to run on pure 32-bit system i.e. not x86-64. If I understood it correctly that option was to make it so it would. Thanks for your reply and help. I started this about a year ago and decided I needed to learn quite a bit more in particular about shell scripting so I left the idea and studied quite a bit. It has been worth it for this alone. Iff you have built everything up to this point as 32-bit, you should not have a problem specifying ABI=32. It sounds as if you have been building a 64-bit system until you got to gmp. There was two reasons actually. 1 - The section at the beginning of the lfs book seemed to indicate one would be better off with a 32-bit build. That is it is more stable, bette r tested, and so forth. While I might not agree fully these are good points to consider and muse upon. 2 - Yes the thought had cross my mind since I have a few different syste all x86 to build clone many but I guess I should stick to the point, that this is meant to be a learn experence. You know off the subject now, I would also like to explain to who ever thought html mail is such a great idea at my service provider a small personal rant ever time I have to use this style of email.Not haveing a cursor is just the start. In any case the point is moot since on this final pass gcc is failing miserable at the make -k check stage(error 2). I guess I will again have to start over. I have found that cutting and pasting at least from the pdf version has caused some errors. What made it so apparrent was the locale section where it split all the first words out (localedef - ) and then after the 10 or 12 localedef it then pasted all the endings. Any way to all who have help much much thanks is given. and then pasted all the rest of the commands last. I don't understand why you would care if the completed LFS system will run on a 32-bit processor ? If you wish to build something that you can install onto 32-bit i686 hardware, then build the 32-bit version of the book, but in all honesty we recommend that you build it on the machine on which it will run. And please note that LFS is either 32 or 64 bit - we don't support multilib. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: tar-1.25 got a tarball file lager than the dir
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote: No need to be rude about it... the world isn't going to end just because someone asked a question on the wrong mailing list... I was saying it in capital letters because he seemed like he ignored me the first time I said that he wrote on the wrong list. -- William Immendorf The ultimate in free computing. Messages in plain text, please, no HTML. GPG key ID: 1697BE98 If it's not signed, it's not from me. -- Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
