[lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Hi all, I started working on LFS 7.2 and I get the following error in GCC 4.7.1 pass 1 (section 5.5.1) as far as I can tell I'm following the book to the letter and the configure I have copied and pasted. I tried the section three times already and every time I get the same error, is it OK or should I check something? My host is Ubuntu 12.04 and the prerequisites passed. the error: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 I have done the tar and mv of the MPFR-3.1.1 for sure. Regards, Israel -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-03 07:53, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build make: *** [all] Error 2 I have done the tar and mv of the MPFR-3.1.1 for sure. Regards, Israel The question is did you do them inside the gcc-4.7.1 directory as it states? Could you attach the output of ls -lah run inside the gcc-4.7.1 directory please. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Video Tutorials
On 2012-09-03 08:54, muhammadreza haghiri wrote: Hi. Will you put video tutorials of LFS book on website? Regards. Muhammadreza Haghiri Without bruce's input I can only really speak for myself and by experiance: 1) Video turorials would be unlikely as they would provide *no* extra benefit to the target audience of the book. 2) They take up valuable space and (see point 1) Provide no added benefit. 3) It can on some systems take 12+ HOURS to do a full build, on some older systems this can be days instead, nobody is going to sit there for 12 hours to watch a video tutorial. 4) If you need a video tutorial the most likely reason is because you dont have the necessary skill level to use the book competently. see: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/prologue/prerequisites.html Building an LFS system is not a simple task. It requires a certain level of existing knowledge of Unix system administration in order to resolve problems and correctly execute the commands listed. In particular, as an absolute minimum, you should already have the ability to use the command line (shell) to copy or move files and directories, list directory and file contents, and change the current directory. It is also expected that you have a reasonable knowledge of using and installing Linux software. Because the LFS book assumes at least this basic level of skill, the various LFS support forums are unlikely to be able to provide you with much assistance in these areas. You will find that your questions regarding such basic knowledge will likely go unanswered or you will simply be referred to the LFS essential pre-reading list. However there are lots of available examples on youtube and other sites on how to *use* the Linux commandline and related commands, so at least in my opinion it would just be diverting resources to perform a task that has already been done: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4rn_ZsuO6I -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Sep 3, 2012, at 01:53 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). Most likely trying to use the host's installed mpfr. First extract the gcc tarball from the sources directory and then change to the directory created. Only then should you proceed with the instructions below. (note at gcc pass1) Example: cd $LFS/sources tar xf gcc-4.7.1.tar.bz2 cd gcc-4.7.1 tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr tar -Jxf ../gmp-5.0.5.tar.xz mv -v gmp-5.0.5 gmp tar -zxf ../mpc-1.0.tar.gz mv -v mpc-1.0 mpc .rest of book commands for gcc pass1 Section 5.3 is clear, the note of gcc is clear. not sure what else could be said to make it clear. Prerequisites are clear. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Video Tutorials
On Sep 3, 2012, at 02:54 AM, muhammadreza haghiri wrote: Hi. Will you put video tutorials of LFS book on website? Regards. Muhammadreza Haghiri They won't be on the website, there are already many video tutorials users have committed to Youtube for building LFS. Go watch them. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Video Tutorials
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:53 PM, William Harrington berzerk...@cox.netwrote: On Sep 3, 2012, at 02:54 AM, muhammadreza haghiri wrote: Hi. Will you put video tutorials of LFS book on website? Regards. Muhammadreza Haghiri They won't be on the website, there are already many video tutorials users have committed to Youtube for building LFS. Go watch them. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Hi. I want to teach LFS to my students , but they don't have enough skill. Regards. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Video Tutorials
On 2012-09-03 09:33, muhammadreza haghiri wrote: Hi. I want to teach LFS to my students , but they dont have enough skill. Regards. Start by teaching them how to use a linux system then. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Video Tutorials
On Sep 3, 2012, at 03:33 AM, muhammadreza haghiri wrote: Hi. I want to teach LFS to my students , but they don't have enough skill. Regards. A video won't give them the skills. Your course should have prerequisites, just like the book. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/ prerequisites.html If the students aren't able to meet the objectives, it's difficult to meet the goals. Also, many people require more hands on experience than watching a video. Videos turn people into robots. I may suggest an audio book, as well! Heh Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Video Tutorials
As William mentioned earlier it would be more appropriate if you can teach your students to gain the skills required by prerequisites. On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:20 PM, William Harrington berzerk...@cox.netwrote: On Sep 3, 2012, at 03:33 AM, muhammadreza haghiri wrote: Hi. I want to teach LFS to my students , but they don't have enough skill. Regards. A video won't give them the skills. Your course should have prerequisites, just like the book. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/ prerequisites.html If the students aren't able to meet the objectives, it's difficult to meet the goals. Also, many people require more hands on experience than watching a video. Videos turn people into robots. I may suggest an audio book, as well! Heh Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] [ot] Top posting vs bottom posting
This is a top post, as has been mentioned counteless times on list DONT DO IT. On 2012-09-03 10:26, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote: As William mentioned earlier it would be more appropriate if you can teach your students to gain the skills required by prerequisites. This is a bottom post, the correct way of replying. Maybe you in particular didn't deserve this particular larting, but somebody had to recieve it, because people have been told repeatedly NOT TO TOP POST. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] no rc.d, no /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
Thanks for that, I continued fine without the missing bits. On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Tobi Ipaye wrote: Hi all, I've been following the stable LFS 7.1 book on-line, details - I noticed the problem when I got to chapter 7.2. General Network Configuration The first part suggests removing network symlinks if there is no network card. I have a network card, but I wanted to see what the symlinks were, this is when I discovered I had no /etc/rc.d This is created when the lfs bootscripts in section 7.6 are installed. I proceeded with the rest of the page, and when it came to doing cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules., I found I had no cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules as well. The only file I have in cat /etc/udev/rule.d is /etc/udev/rules.d/55-lfs.rules. /sys and /proc need to be mounted as in Section 6.2. In some cases, e.g. vmware, the rules are not created (or needed) because the network mac address is not consistent across boots. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Hi, Thanks for your reply. I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.3K Jul 14 2005 symlink-tree -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 6.1K Aug 22 2009 ylwrap drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 zlib On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:22 AM, William Harrington berzerk...@cox.netwrote: On Sep 3, 2012, at 01:53 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). Most likely trying to use the host's installed mpfr. First extract the gcc tarball from the sources directory and then change to the directory created. Only then should you proceed with the instructions below. (note at gcc pass1) Example: cd $LFS/sources tar xf gcc-4.7.1.tar.bz2 cd gcc-4.7.1 tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr tar -Jxf ../gmp-5.0.5.tar.xz mv -v gmp-5.0.5 gmp tar -zxf ../mpc-1.0.tar.gz mv -v mpc-1.0 mpc .rest of book commands for gcc pass1 Section 5.3 is clear, the note of gcc is clear. not sure what else could be said to make it clear. Prerequisites are clear. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:
Re: [lfs-support] /usr/lib/libstdc++.la getting trashed
On 09/02/2012 10:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
For some months now, I've had failures in BLFS when
/usr/libstdc++.la was found to be empty ('not a valid libtool
archive') : I know Armin removes these .la files, but I've found
that some things don't rebuild on updates if I do that - on x86_64
and previously on ppc/{,64}. Last week, I had another such failure
in something, and finally bit the bullet and reworked my scripts to
test that this file - if it exists - is not empty.
Tonight, I'm building 7.2 on my server. On the way into chroot
[ my scripts do a few things here which are done inside chroot in
the book ] the test triggered.
Looking at the timestamp, /usr/lib/libstdc++.la with a length of
zero was updated within the 5 minutes before I saw the error and
looked at it. I restored it from a backup, and now chapter 6 is
building.
Bu now that I think about this : when it happened (somewhere at the
end of chapter 5) I was user lfs, so I should not have been able to
wipe this file.
I know that I've got problems that are specific to my scripts (e.g.
automake tests fail in chroot), so I need to ask : has anyone else
ever seen this sort of error, or am I out on my own ?
ĸen
I remove all the *.la files on my builds
Although I am only building LFS-7.1 and LFS-7.2 as of now
I will see how that affects BLFS once I get there.
Arch linux has most always removed the *.la files and I am following
that lead, I will then learn if it works ;)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Sep 3, 2012, at 06:33 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: Hi, Thanks for your reply. I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr Also, the other problem would be that LFS_TGT isn't set. We can tell by looking at config.log . You should be the lfs user the whole time. Double check your environment as created in chapter 4 when creating the lfs user. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.3K Jul 14 2005 symlink-tree -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 6.1K Aug 22 2009 ylwrap drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 zlib I know it's frustrating -- it's the same bug that I and numerous others have experienced, but none of the team will accept that it's a bug. It took me four or five attempts to get GCC to build, but my problem was at pass 2. At one attempt I even copied and pasted the whole instruction set and it still failed at the same point that you've found. Bruce suggested wrapping the commands in a script so you can see what's happening, and that seems like a good idea, however I had already built it by then by doing nothing different -- just trying it yet again. I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 9/3/2012 11:23 AM, Richard Melville wrote: I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. Richard As I understand it, with the first two times the toolchain is being built, and GMP, MPC, and MPFR aren't actually needed as part of said toolchain. With the last build, you're building the final system, and so they need to be installed in the system before building the new system's compiler. Of course, I expect to be corrected by an editor who's been building it several thousand times a year. :) Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] /usr/lib/libstdc++.la getting trashed
Ken Moffat wrote: I know that I've got problems that are specific to my scripts (e.g. automake tests fail in chroot), so I need to ask : has anyone else ever seen this sort of error, or am I out on my own ? No I haven't. In my latest build I have: $ cd /mnt/lfs/ $ ls -l usr/lib/libstd* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2851280 Sep 2 01:40 usr/lib/libstdc++.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 959 Sep 1 23:26 usr/lib/libstdc++.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Sep 1 23:26 usr/lib/libstdc++.so - libstdc++.so.6.0.17 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Sep 1 23:26 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 - libstdc++.so.6.0.17 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1260202 Sep 2 01:40 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17 Once those files are there, I don't know of anything that would alter or remove them. The only automake failure I have is due to not having python installed. It might be an interesting experiment if you have a zero length .la file to just delete it and see if the error still occurs. Personally I've never seen the purpose of libtool or .la files. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/3/2012 11:23 AM, Richard Melville wrote: I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. As I understand it, with the first two times the toolchain is being built, and GMP, MPC, and MPFR aren't actually needed as part of said toolchain. With the last build, you're building the final system, and so they need to be installed in the system before building the new system's compiler. The only program in Chapter 5 that needs GMP, MPC, and MPFR is gcc and having gcc build them is easier than three additional sections. In Chapter 6 they are separate so other programs can use them if desired. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] /usr/lib/libstdc++.la getting trashed
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:41:55AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
I know that I've got problems that are specific to my scripts (e.g.
automake tests fail in chroot), so I need to ask : has anyone else
ever seen this sort of error, or am I out on my own ?
No I haven't. In my latest build I have:
$ cd /mnt/lfs/
$ ls -l usr/lib/libstd*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2851280 Sep 2 01:40 usr/lib/libstdc++.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 959 Sep 1 23:26 usr/lib/libstdc++.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Sep 1 23:26 usr/lib/libstdc++.so -
libstdc++.so.6.0.17
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Sep 1 23:26 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 -
libstdc++.so.6.0.17
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1260202 Sep 2 01:40 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17
Once those files are there, I don't know of anything that would alter or
remove them.
Yeah, this is on the host. When I've been hit by it in the past,
it has been some days after it disappeared - I've eventually started
to believe a seriously broken package, or a build failure at an
obscure place in a c++ package was doing it.
But, now that I think about it, I'm almost certain that one of the
scripts I run on the way _into_ chroot (different from the book, so
directories and symlinks should be prefixed ${LFS} when I create them)
is suffering from a thinko. That would probably explain why I haven't
noticed until much later.
The only automake failure I have is due to not having python installed.
My automake failures were just as an example to note that my
scripts are known to sometimes be buggy. But, if I build and test
automake *by hand* in a completed system, with python installed, that
test still fails - unlike the 80+ tests that are now ok.
It might be an interesting experiment if you have a zero length .la file
to just delete it and see if the error still occurs.
Normally, I notice it when I'm upgrading or looking at new packages
in BLFS. Most recently, gcr failed to compile, and the time when
the .la had been trashed matches when I was playing about with
building 7.2 from itself.
Some packages build ok if I remove the empty .la file. Others
don't. At the moment the only one I can find noted for certain is
ImageMagick - that isn't surprising, that package *needs* its own
.la files at *runtime* to be able to use the 'delegates'.
Personally I've never seen the purpose of libtool or .la files.
-- Bruce
Well, they seem to be redundant on linux, and I spent some time
back in my clfs days checking what the distros were doing, and then
decided to remove them. On i686 I never saw a problem (except,
perhaps, in ImageMagick - or perhaps its need for .la files is more
recent). On ppc, ppc64, and non-multilib x86_64 everything seemed
to build fine (I had a much smaller set of packages in those days),
but I ran into problems during upgrades - not the same missing .la
files on each architecture! - and eventually gave up.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? On Sep 3, 2012 7:24 PM, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote: I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.3K Jul 14 2005 symlink-tree -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 6.1K Aug 22 2009 ylwrap drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 zlib I know it's frustrating -- it's the same bug that I and numerous others have experienced, but none of the team will accept that it's a bug. It took me four or five attempts to get GCC to build, but my problem was at pass 2. At one attempt I even copied and pasted the whole instruction set and it still failed at the same point that you've found. Bruce suggested wrapping the commands in a script so you can see what's happening, and that seems like a good idea, however I had already built it by then by doing nothing different
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? Why do you want to remove gcc at all? If you want to add ANY new programs at all, you'll need gcc in order to compile and install them properly. Even if you want to use other compilers, they still need to be compiled and installed with gcc prior to removing gcc at all. Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? Why do you want to remove gcc at all? If you want to add ANY new programs at all, you'll need gcc in order to compile and install them properly. Even if you want to use other compilers, they still need to be compiled and installed with gcc prior to removing gcc at all. Removing gcc can do a couple of things. First is saves some space. Second, it makes is more difficult for a bad guy to compile malware for the system. The original worm, the Morris worm around 1988, propagated itself via email where sendmail automatically compiled a program and ran it. That hole has been closed for a long time, but in theory, the same thing can happen if the compiler is present. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
And another thing, when you have a compiler you never know if a software works because you wrote it good or because it has the compiler's enviroment. Anotger question a bit OT, can a LFS be built from rpms so we will have a comfertable way to update it? On Sep 3, 2012 9:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? Why do you want to remove gcc at all? If you want to add ANY new programs at all, you'll need gcc in order to compile and install them properly. Even if you want to use other compilers, they still need to be compiled and installed with gcc prior to removing gcc at all. Removing gcc can do a couple of things. First is saves some space. Second, it makes is more difficult for a bad guy to compile malware for the system. The original worm, the Morris worm around 1988, propagated itself via email where sendmail automatically compiled a program and ran it. That hole has been closed for a long time, but in theory, the same thing can happen if the compiler is present. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] remove or hide the build tools - was LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Am 03.09.2012 19:24, schrieb Israel Silberg:
And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system
without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it
when the system is done?
i just add
--bindir=${DEVLOP}
--sbindir=${DEVLOP}
to the following packages configure-options:
gcc glibc automake autoconf pkgconfig libtool binutils
there might be some other packages to consider, but for me these seem to
be sufficient.
root and lfsuser (the user who builds all the stuff) have the following
added to their profile
DEVLOP=/home/lfsuser/devlop
PATH=${DEVLOP}:${PATH}
no user but root and lfsuser have access to ${DEVLOP} by chown
lfsuser.root ${DEVLOP}
everything but bin and sbin files are install in the usual place. but
the binaries are some kind of hidden.
binutils is a little special:
some binaries are installed in ${DEVLOP} AND /usr/bin (ar as ld ld.bfd
objcopy objdump ranlib strip) which i delete from /usr/bin to have juse
one copy in ${DEVLOP}
if there is need, you can just move a file from ${DEVLOP} to /usr/bin.
i do so for size and strings from binutils
and i had to make a symlink from ${DEVLOP}/cpp to /lib/cpp as some
packages require /lib/cpp (don't ask which - it's quite some time ago i
'invented' this 'security scheme' for my servers)
to be even more paranoid, just move all the stuff in ${DEVLOP} to an usb
stick - it's less than 8mb of data! whenever you have to build
something, just insert the stick and mount it to ${DEVLOP}. that's what
i did first. but as i have to maintain the servers over ssh (or travel
for hours), i dropped it - except for the client-systems at our local
school.
tobias
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] remove or hide the build tools - was LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Thanks for the clear explanation
On Sep 3, 2012 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser l...@ebp-gasser.ch wrote:
Am 03.09.2012 19:24, schrieb Israel Silberg:
And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system
without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove
it
when the system is done?
i just add
--bindir=${DEVLOP}
--sbindir=${DEVLOP}
to the following packages configure-options:
gcc glibc automake autoconf pkgconfig libtool binutils
there might be some other packages to consider, but for me these seem to
be sufficient.
root and lfsuser (the user who builds all the stuff) have the following
added to their profile
DEVLOP=/home/lfsuser/devlop
PATH=${DEVLOP}:${PATH}
no user but root and lfsuser have access to ${DEVLOP} by chown
lfsuser.root ${DEVLOP}
everything but bin and sbin files are install in the usual place. but
the binaries are some kind of hidden.
binutils is a little special:
some binaries are installed in ${DEVLOP} AND /usr/bin (ar as ld ld.bfd
objcopy objdump ranlib strip) which i delete from /usr/bin to have juse
one copy in ${DEVLOP}
if there is need, you can just move a file from ${DEVLOP} to /usr/bin.
i do so for size and strings from binutils
and i had to make a symlink from ${DEVLOP}/cpp to /lib/cpp as some
packages require /lib/cpp (don't ask which - it's quite some time ago i
'invented' this 'security scheme' for my servers)
to be even more paranoid, just move all the stuff in ${DEVLOP} to an usb
stick - it's less than 8mb of data! whenever you have to build
something, just insert the stick and mount it to ${DEVLOP}. that's what
i did first. but as i have to maintain the servers over ssh (or travel
for hours), i dropped it - except for the client-systems at our local
school.
tobias
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/03/2012 01:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? On Sep 3, 2012 7:24 PM, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com mailto:richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote: I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in http://config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac http://configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/03/2012 03:51 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: And another thing, when you have a compiler you never know if a software works because you wrote it good or because it has the compiler's enviroment. Anotger question a bit OT, can a LFS be built from rpms so we will have a comfertable way to update it? [putolin] I have built it using Arch linux pacman package manager which for my purpose is better. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] make modules_install
Here on chapter 8.3 the command make modules_install is giving me the following warning upon completion. Warning: you may need to install module-init-tools -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] make modules_install
Garrett Gaston wrote: Here on chapter 8.3 the command make modules_install is giving me the following warning upon completion. Warning: you may need to install module-init-tools Do you have kmod installed properly? What the kernel is looking for is depmod and that is provided by kmod. $ ls -l /sbin/depmod lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Aug 22 07:28 /sbin/depmod - ../bin/kmod -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] make modules_install
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:04:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Garrett Gaston wrote: Here on chapter 8.3 the command make modules_install is giving me the following warning upon completion. Warning: you may need to install module-init-tools Do you have kmod installed properly? What the kernel is looking for is depmod and that is provided by kmod. $ ls -l /sbin/depmod lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Aug 22 07:28 /sbin/depmod - ../bin/kmod I think Garrett is using 7.1 - older kernels used to give that message, but worked fine with the versions of kmod in LFS. Certainly the message has gone with 3.5 kernels. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
I just joined this list and can't respond properly. I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. Walter Webb ** -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Walter Webb wrote: I just joined this list and can't respond properly. I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. Good point. Using -j 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can cause race conditions that sometimes cause a failure. I suppose we can put a warning about this in the gcc sections, but we'd need it in three places. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
