On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does util-linux nologin binary
On 04/07/2014 08:03 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin
On 04/07/2014 06:53 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
William Immendorf wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
I'll see what I can do.
I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to
remove an
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
desired because util
I am in the process of collecting information on usinf eudev in my rpm
lfs builds I have found a broken link on the
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/download.html page.
When clicking the link for Hints Tarball (Generated daily) I get
Page not found!
Perhaps you mistyped the URL?
In the
On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux
systems file system layout matches/closely matches my
On 03/23/2014 07:32 AM, Robin wrote:
On 23 March 2014 11:22, baho utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like
On 03/23/2014 11:58 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
Just trying to match what I have on my unix boxes. Even if it hasn't
been updated doesn't mean it's not relavent.
I understand adding /sys but /run makes no sense as it could have been
/var/run which by the way IS in the standard
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux
systems file system layout matches/closely matches my FreeBSD systems.
When was the /run directory introduced and what package(s) required
moving
As I am working on my build scripts for building LFS and adding the RPM
package manager.
I need to check my work against some one elses builds to be sure that I
haven't created a catastrophe for myself.
Are log files avaliable from chapter5 and chapter 6 builds?
If so can some one
On 12/03/2013 02:17 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 23:47 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 19:49 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
The following packages are the only ones I have found ( in Chapter 5 )
that either puts something into or requires /lib64
binutils-pass-1
gcc
On 12/02/2013 12:10 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same
Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories
--
On 11/29/2013 07:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
I would like to build
On 11/26/2013 09:23 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
Want to bet which one of these I can remember?
p33p1 for people!
Nope too many characters
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs
On 11/26/2013 03:09 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 20:12 -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/25/2013 11:04 AM, William Harrington wrote:
Your link name is p4p1.
How does this name, given by Fedora, relate to the enp3s0 that my
kernel assigned (see my earlier reply to
On 11/23/2013 03:21 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
One of
the conclusions that I have drawn is that GRUB2 in it's current state
will not boot a kernel compiled and installed via LFS.
Nonsense grub2 will boot kernels compiled and install from LFS. I do it
all the time.
Although I am not using UEFI.
I
On 11/12/2013 07:33 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:56PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
Where do I go from here?
Find the part of the output with the actual 'Error' message (it might
say 'error'). It looks as if the real error was before that warning
about makeinfo.
On 09/01/2013 09:57 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have just built the book after updating from svn and it doesn't have
the tar man page patch in the wget-list nor in the md5sums files.
OK, thanks. I'll investigate.
Needed a minor change to the Makefile
Can someone check the perms on /lib/udev/init-net-rules.sh
On my build it is not install with execute perms.
This could be my fault I want to check to see if others have this.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
On 08/30/2013 10:02 AM, hans kaper wrote:
Op Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:30:17 +0200 schreef Baho Utot
baho-u...@columbus.rr.com:
Can someone check the perms on /lib/udev/init-net-rules.sh
On my build it is not install with execute perms.
This could be my fault I want to check to see if others
On 08/25/2013 01:17 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/25/2013 01:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/25/2013 12:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/25/2013 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have found that when there is not a cd/dvd in the drive there is no
symlink /dev
On 08/24/2013 10:14 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 08:54:02PM -0400, Walter Webb wrote:
My latest computer has two dvd's; only one is a writer. I also have
a usb dvd writer that I occasionally use. Pre systemd udev generated
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules for the
On 08/25/2013 10:44 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 09:27:37AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/24/2013 10:14 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
Does anyone else see eject failing to eject a CD/DVD with 7.3 or
later ? Eject is now part of util-linux so you don't need to
install anything
On 08/25/2013 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/25/2013 10:44 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 09:27:37AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/24/2013 10:14 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
Does anyone else see eject failing to eject a CD/DVD with 7.3 or
later ? Eject
On 08/25/2013 12:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/25/2013 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have found that when there is not a cd/dvd in the drive there is no
symlink /dev/cdrom so maybe eject then finds nothing to eject?
After a cd/dvd/ is placed into the drive /dev/cdrom
On 08/25/2013 01:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/25/2013 12:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/25/2013 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have found that when there is not a cd/dvd in the drive there is no
symlink /dev/cdrom so maybe eject then finds nothing
I am pulling the SVN book version from svn repos and building html and
pdf versions. It also builds the bootscripts.
When LFS-7.4 is released will this go from SVN-date to 7.4?
Or will the final book/bootscripts versions just be placed online?
--
I found this error in the book
It is possible to make the ext3 filesystem reliable across power
failures for some hard disk types. To do this, add the barrier=1 mount
option to the appropriate entry in /etc/fstab. To check if the disk
drive supports this option, run hdparm on the
On 05/20/2013 02:12 AM, Markku Pesonen wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I
have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it
had problems mounting the partition due to unsupported options, it has
EXT3-fs
I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I
have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it
had problems mounting the partition due to unsupported options, it has
EXT3-fs in the first two error messages, the third message says it uses
EXT4-fs and
On 5/19/2013 9:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:22:45PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I
have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it
had problems mounting the partition
On 05/17/2013 05:29 PM, Sandy Widianto wrote:
I don't understand about top post I just replied it. Now I will
continue for compilations, I want everything goes smoothly. Thank you
Mr. Bruce.
Sandy Widianto
You just did it again Top Posted a little google.com work will explain
it to you
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
Hi,
Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS
is to not use /usr/libexec ??
I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's
what has
tool) to work.
Is ALFS still active - nothing seems to have changed with it since July
2009?
Is there another way to build LFS 7.3 automatically?
thanks,
Anthony Wright
I have some scripts at: https://github.com/baho-utot
You can get some ideas there.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
I am using the SVN-20130401 the All fools version.
I have built a completely new system using this version upon booting it
has a huge delay when booting.
It stops/delays at the populating dev which I take as waiting for udev
to do its work.
Since reverting to the udev-198 build from version
On 03/30/2013 03:03 PM, bcl...@brianclarkprojects.com wrote:
Hello,
I am getting a message that says I should not be getting this message.
When the computer goes to mount dev and other directories. It is
giving an error of unknown file system devtmpfs. I have tried
multiple kernel
On 03/21/2013 12:44 PM, Mihal wrote:
On lfs 6.8 on chapter 5.7 whet i run make i have an error :
if test -r /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new; then mv -f
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h; \
else echo 2 'This
There appears to be an error with the
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/read.html URL
Gives the following:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
On 03/03/2013 02:36 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 03/01/2013 08:15 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
FYI - For those that may be interested.
I have just finished my current project, building LFS using the RPM
package manager.
It builds the LFS tool chain from bash scripts, then RPM is build and
installed
scripts.
The whole build is controlled by a single bash script, so that once the
environment is setup, running the control script will build LFS in one
go. Set the root passwd and then reboot to the newly built system.
I have uploaded it to github.
Here is the URL:
https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS
On 01/23/2013 12:43 PM, Philippe Delavalade wrote:
Hi.
When testing glibc in chapter 6, i obtain an error which looks like one of
those signaled in the book but :
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cputimer1.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2
Another error is marked as
On 01/23/2013 02:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 01/23/2013 12:43 PM, Philippe Delavalade wrote:
Hi.
When testing glibc in chapter 6, i obtain an error which looks like one of
those signaled in the book but :
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cputimer1.out] Error 1
On 01/23/2013 02:22 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 01/23/2013 02:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 01/23/2013 12:43 PM, Philippe Delavalade wrote:
Hi.
When testing glibc in chapter 6, i obtain an error which looks like one of
those signaled in the book but :
make[2]: *** [/sources
LFS-7.2
I added a swapfile as follows
dd if=/dev/zero of=/swapfile bs=2048 count - 1G
mkswap /swapfile
chown root.root /swapfile
chmod 0600 /swapfile
swapon /swapfile
That worked.
I then added to /etc/fstab
/swapfileswapswapdefaults0 0
rebooted
Boot error,
Activating blah blah
On 01/09/2013 08:51 AM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
On 1/7/2013 7:18 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
I am trying to put LFS on a thumbdrive to use a rescue/fixit system.
[...]
Any one known what needs to be set in the kernel to allow booting from
thumb drive?
Once you get this to work, can you please
On 01/08/2013 04:23 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:18 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
I am trying to put LFS on a thumbdrive to use a rescue/fixit system.
When I boot it can not find the usb drive and filesystem. I have the
correct filesystem built into the kernel, not as a module
I
I am trying to put LFS on a thumbdrive to use a rescue/fixit system.
When I boot it can not find the usb drive and filesystem. I have the
correct filesystem built into the kernel, not as a module
I am miising something in my kernel config.
This system boots fine from a hard drive, just won't
Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 11:39 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The idea of the script was that it should be short. Generally the
problem is that the symlinks are not set and occasionally makeinfo is
not installed. Rarely is the problem an out-of-date executable.
My issue with the
I am working on adding cpu frequency control to BLFS. I needed to load
the cpufreq_ondemand etc kernel modules. I placed a file into
/etc/modprobe.d and the modules where no loaded. When I placed them
into /etc/sysconfig/modules of course they loaded fine.
I have a file installed by LFS-7.2
On 01/05/13 16:29, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I am working on adding cpu frequency control to BLFS. I needed to load
the cpufreq_ondemand etc kernel modules. I placed a file into
/etc/modprobe.d and the modules where no loaded. When I placed them
into /etc/sysconfig/modules
On 01/05/13 16:47, Thomas de Roo wrote:
On 01/05/13 22:39, Baho Utot wrote:
Yes I understand where the module loading currently is located in LFS.
That is why after putting a file under /etc/modprobe.d and it did not
load, then putting them into /etc/sysconfig/modules and it working lead
me
Chris J. Breisch wrote:
On 1/3/2013 10:13 AM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
On 1/3/2013 9:50 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
I got that package wrong before also, before I scripted my builds.
In my experience this is generally related to the bash environment or
the host system requirements.
Try running
Chris J. Breisch wrote:
[putolin]
So, clearly the problem is that ld isn't looking for crt1.o where it
resides. Obviously, I've done something wrong on a preceding step, but
I'm unable to find it.
But I don't know which step is wrong. Did make install of glibc install
it in the wrong
Chris J. Breisch wrote:
On 1/3/2013 8:44 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
Check the tools symlink
ls -l /tools
should output something like this: tools - /mnt/lfs/tools/
It does.
crt1.o is part of the glibc package, you should review the installation
of that package.
Make sure the environment
On 12/26/2012 02:10 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
You should have liblzma.so in /tools/lib and lzma.h in /tools/include.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
On 11/09/2012 12:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I guess it really doesn't make a lot of difference to me. I reboot
rarely so typing startx isn't an issue.
$ uptime
09:35:21 up 128 days, 17:36, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.21, 0.23
Well you are indeed behind
baho-utot
On 11/09/2012 12:53 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
On 11/09/2012 12:30 PM, Prabhu wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile GCC, I done with untaring (MPFR,GMP and
MPC ) and moving the files to its respected folders, and even
configuration part also done. but while making the Gcc its throwing me
On 11/06/2012 12:29 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
On 11/05/12 17:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
For an SSD drive, I suggest getting gptdisk (fdisk syntax) or gparted
(challenging syntax) and partitioning the drive as a gpt drive.
I have been building on an old 32bit box with rotating disks.
I am
On 10/11/2012 03:42 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote:
I got this: ./bld: line 16: /usr/bin/mv: No such file or directory
when I ran my script for coreutils. I navigated to the /usr/bin
directory of the chroot enironment and there is no mv file or
directory. Any ideas? Also, if you want to see my
On 10/04/2012 03:05 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote:
I've written the script below for starting the exiting the chroot
environment for starting and stopping the LFS project. I'M concerned
about the logout and umount commands. I need the script to do all the
unmounts upon exiting or logging out. I'M
On 09/27/2012 06:40 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote:
I got the following for gclibc, any ideas?
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/lfs/sources/Chapter-5/5.7._Glibc-2.16.0/glibc-2.16.0'
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find crt1.o:
On 09/24/2012 10:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
3. Actually, you *don't* need to figure out all the 32 vs 64 bit
stuff - unless you want to.
Agree.
GCC works better with more
registers, which is one of the main reasons for using x86_64 - the
drawback is that pointers are
I am trying to understand how to set this file for LFS-7.2
What is the default for the following variables?
That is if you don't use this file and it is not present.
KEYMAP
FONT
From my research I think it is the following is the same as not having
the file:
cat /etc/sysconfig/console EOF
On 09/24/2012 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I am trying to understand how to set this file for LFS-7.2
What is the default for the following variables?
That is if you don't use this file and it is not present.
KEYMAP
FONT
From my research I think it is the following
On 09/24/2012 01:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have found that this will not cause an error
KEYMAP=us
FONT=lat1-16 -m 8859-1
and the system will boot without displaying an error.
I don't know if that is the same if you don't have a console files or not.
Now I am trying
On 09/24/2012 09:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:14:33PM -0400, Wally Lepore wrote:
Hi Members,
I hope to begin the journey of learning to build my own LFS distro and
have been reading the Essential Pre-Reading Guide for Life with LFS
(over and over) as well as the LFS
On 09/20/2012 02:26 AM, Whitequill Riclo wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Whitequill Riclo wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Feuerbacher, Alan
afeuerbac...@allegromicro.com
On 09/20/2012 02:26 AM, Whitequill Riclo wrote:
[putolin]
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb77a7000)
-- Bruce
I think I know what I'm doing wrong finally, all the command flags
I'm using to find mpfr are to find the mpfr library/header file,
rather then find the source to
Hi all,
I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I
can't boot into the LFS kernel.
It displays :
VFS: Cannot open root device sdb1 or unkonwn-block(2,0)
Please append a correct root= boot option;
Kernel panic - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs
On 09/10/2012 06:53 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:51 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 09/05/2012 11:26 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 08/24/2012 10:35 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have
On 09/09/2012 11:05 AM, Robert Cox wrote:
hello,
Wow lots to learn, I have little computer background and no
formal computer training I'm self taught.
I'm a bit stuck... menuconfig.. and the file .config coping over my
distro's config file to .config in the build directory then
On 09/07/2012 01:12 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me.
so you just had very very much luck on your way...
there are packages which CAN fail with parallel builds.
yes i know that, but I do not attribute my success
On 09/05/2012 11:26 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 08/24/2012 10:35 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
I am going to update
I have a modified build as I have added pacman package management to the
build which have have some impact on this error.
Anyway I needed to add
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} -ludev-local.a make -f udev-lfs-188/Makefile.lfs
to get udev to compile as gcc/ld failed to link udev-local.a
I will let you
I have successfully built, installed and ran LFS-7.2 on i686 and x_86_64
platforms pretty much using the books instructions. The only changes
were very small to incorporate a package manager, nothing major.
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to
On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a is supposed to be included in executables directly as
an archive
On 09/06/2012 04:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a
On 09/05/2012 03:33 AM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
Attached are the error messages from running make this way:
make 2error
The output should be there as well, but I don't know how to redirect
that with the errors into the file.
make | tee build.log
--
On 09/05/2012 08:17 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
On 2012-09-05 10:43, Richard Melville wrote:
Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). Picking up on
what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to
building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, Im wondering if there may
On 09/05/2012 09:55 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
On 2012-09-05 13:34, Baho Utot wrote:
[putolin]
I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me.
Maybe those that do have a problem are all using a scripted build vs
those that don't have a scripted build?
Suggesting
On 09/05/2012 02:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the
book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who
knows by some not following the book new things are learned?
I don't have problem
On 09/05/2012 03:47 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote:
On 9/5/2012 2:35 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it
correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual
way is a great problem.
Have you ever thought that the manual way does
On 09/05/2012 03:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit# exit if error
set -o nounset# exit if variable not initalized
set +h# disable hashall
shopt -s -o pipefail
pkgname=package name
pkgver=package version
srcname=${pkgname}-${pkgver
On 09/05/2012 04:15 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:54:50PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script
then run it instead of the tty?
What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it
doesn't work. If I
On 09/03/2012 11:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Walter Webb wrote:
I just joined this list and can't respond properly.
I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg.
I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked.
Good point. Using -j 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can
cause
On 09/02/2012 10:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
For some months now, I've had failures in BLFS when
/usr/libstdc++.la was found to be empty ('not a valid libtool
archive') : I know Armin removes these .la files, but I've found
that some things don't rebuild on updates if I do that - on x86_64
and
On 09/03/2012 01:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
Thaks all for the replies,
Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going
on? How do I make the script write me the data I need?
I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-)
And another question, if I want in the end
On 09/03/2012 03:51 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
And another thing, when you have a compiler you never know if a
software works because you wrote it good or because it has the
compiler's enviroment.
Anotger question a bit OT, can a LFS be built from rpms so we will
have a comfertable way to
On 08/30/2012 09:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/30/2012 08:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/30/2012 05:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
/run was in place so the only thing missing, was it was on the root file
system on the ssd, it just was not mounted in tmpfs
On 08/31/2012 11:53 AM, Mikie wrote:
Another thing I see is that when I boot to a live CD and run fdisk I tried to
delete the 2nd partition (host system) to see if it was the issue.
Last build of LFS I was able to boot no problem and I had deleted /dev/sda2
at the end of chapter 9 ... but
I have been looking at how the bootup is in LFS.
Am I correct to assume it goes something like this
grub--kernel--initd /etc/inittab -- rc S -- run levels?
When is the getty section run in the above sequence?
Also upon looking at the boot scripts I am a bit confused here:
cleanfs is suppose
On 08/30/2012 05:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
I found the above because I didn't have the /run line in the fsatb and
bad things happened when it was missing...would not get to the login,
it would boot but hang at the whats on the usb phase of the bootup.
What can I say. Follow the
On 08/30/2012 08:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/30/2012 05:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
I found the above because I didn't have the /run line in the fsatb and
bad things happened when it was missing...would not get to the login,
it would boot but hang at the whats
On 08/29/2012 11:23 AM, Mikie wrote:
William,
I did the same thing and had the same issue.
When you execute this line in a bash script:
exec /tools/bin/bash --login +h
exec /tools/bin/bash --login +h -c SomeScriptIWantTo Run.sh
[putolin]
--
Ineptocracy
(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a
On 08/29/2012 01:18 PM, Mikie wrote:
exec /tools/bin/bash --login +h -c SomeScriptIWantTo Run.sh
What does the -c do?
Thanks
man bash is your friend
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On 08/29/2012 04:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Aydın Demirel wrote:
Hi;
29-08-2012 23:14 tarihinde, Bruce Dubbs yazdı:
Aydın Demirel wrote:
Hi;
I try to compiling lfs stable version (7.1). Currently, binutils package
gives an error while compiling:
checking for gmp.h... no
configure:
On 08/28/2012 05:05 PM, Mike Johnston wrote:
Maybe I'm dense here, but the Util-Linux doesn't have a fsck.ext2 or
fsck.ext3 in it's list of programs installed. Which module installs
an fsck capable of ext2/3 filesystems?
When I built Util-linux I didn't get a fsck.ext2 or ext3. I only saw
On 08/28/2012 06:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
What was wrong with ken.moffat?
LOL.I don't think anyone shoukd answer that.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
