of Minix than anything
else. If there was genius in what he did, it was in throwing it
open to anybody who wanted it, and took their help in expanding it.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally
? New and removed features, considerations about
implementation, etc.? Someplace where we can see what's in it,
whether it has anything for us or not?
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally
go on with the BLFS book.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...
--
http
, book good isn't helpful when one doesn't grasp, for
cultural or linguistic reasons, what you mean by follow.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL
FWIW, the rest of my 6.6 build was uneventful, and it booted last
night. That's not yet much of a test, none at all of nscd.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after
to
a network until it's armored-up.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different
similar it may be to gawk,
but gawk is what the Host System Requirements specify.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http
on the hard drive,
and then add a symlink to bash. Make sense or is there an easier way?
Any recommendations on a rescue disk?
What have you got? Tom's root boot (RTBT) runs on a floppy. Knoppix?
If you don't have a Knoppix LiveCD, you should. Virtually any LiveCD
should do.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog
. Then my Stage2-glibc (Pass2) build
without the diddled nscd Makefile got compiled with the SSP trick
embedded in nscd. I guess I don't quite understand why that finished
Stage1 compiler is still contaminated any better than anybody else,
but it's gone now. I think.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog
need cmp, IIRC.
Maybe I'll have to wait a bit.
Is there some difficulty coming up I haven't gotten to yet? ;-)
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line
hacking one in, of course.
So, by all means, more power to LFS!
In some senses at least. ;-)
If I'm reading those correctly the problem happens when newer
versions of gcc are compiled against an older version of glibc,
which begs the question, why was Paul Rogers getting the undefined
.
Retrying the compile with the Stage2 gcc was next on my list anyhow.
News at 11.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http
-build/nptl/tst-cancelx16.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/usr/local/src/glibc-build/nptl/tst-cancelx20.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/usr/local/src/glibc-build/nptl/tst-cancelx21.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http
requirements for the book. Otherwise you aren't proving
building will work with only those.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL
hardware working. But part of the process for that is updating the
software.
Darn, and here I thought trying to upgrade from 6.1 to 6.6 was exactly
that! And the only reason I decided to do that was I found an
affordable hardware upgrade from my MMX-233's to these Tualatins.
--
Paul Rogers
in the past that I don't anticipate a straightforward
install would be beyond me. Famous last words, eh? ;-)
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL
a LEAF-Bering peripheral firewall acting as a DNS
relay. On the other hand, it should be made, because I, or anybody I
gave the system to, might sometime NOT have another DNS relay. But
there's no way to bypass it without hacking it, and everybody here
would be aghast at that. ;-)
--
Paul Rogers
be done.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own
--
http
afterwards was always a
bonus... :)
Otherwise we'd use that OTHER software we can't touch, eh?
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL
.
I'm also slightly worried by the implication in your post that any
random version of what is in BLFS will do. Maybe you didn't mean
that, but
Did I write that? I don't think I wrote that. I don't remember even
seeing that.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net
HSR needs patching? I need an interim step,
say my own build of 6.3? Is that where we are? If that's confirmed,
I'll abandon this 6.6 build until I've done that--but I'd like to have
all your best advice on that--it's twice as much work!
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net
of a similar thread from March and April on this topic and
found no instruction, other than to avoid pretty much. I do want to
get around this impediment and continue using LFS.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do
of kernel version.
Besides I rather think the LiveCD starts the NIC/network, mine doesn't
and I really don't want that.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after
for that __stack_chk_guard variable, assuming it was
defined there. It's not. Could someone please grep their include
directory and let me know where it is defined? I haven't found it on
my system.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do
that
and put it into corporate service unawares.
This 6.6 system I've been working on booted to single user mode.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL
with that version? I suppose if that works I could use it for my stage
1 compiler?
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http
capturing the console listings, give me a reproducible build process
ala ALFS, and this kind of thing isn't scriptable.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line
, I'd be more than willing to try to resolve this impediment.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://www.fastmail.fm
it worked, eh? So now go back to my build script and
pick it up again with make and see if it will complete? Meaning
my glibc will have this one stack busting flaw forever?
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates.
(I do
/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -
I../nptl -I.. -I../libio -I. -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include
../include/libc-
symbols.h -DNOT_IN_libc=1 -o /usr/local/src/glibc-build/nscd/nscd.o -MD
-MP -MF /usr/local/src/glibc-build/nscd/nscd.o.dt -MT
/usr/local/src/glibc-
build/nscd/nscd.o
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog
]: *** [/usr/local/src/glibc-build/nscd/nscd] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/glibc-2.11.1/nscd'
make[1]: *** [nscd/others] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/glibc-2.11.1'
make: *** [all] Error 2
TIA!
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net
31 matches
Mail list logo
